Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 138 2 b iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
For a nonzero group representation , there is a -equivariant identificationwhere acts on endomorphisms by conjugation. The identity endomorphism is a nonzero fixed vector, so its span is a trivial submodule. It follows that the trivial simple module is a Jordan–Hölder factor of , and character additivity gives .
Here “constituent” means a composition factor; the trivial submodule need not be a direct summand. Also the assertion needs : the zero-dimensional module has the zero Brauer character, whose product with its conjugate has no constituent. This is an implicit nonzero-character qualification in the printed statement.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 138 4 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
An integral form of a group representation is a -stable finite free -submodule with . Such a form exists: take a basis lattice and replace it by , which is finite and torsion-free and therefore free over the discrete valuation ring .
Choose ordinary simple modules with forms , and modular simple modules with projective covers . With a uniformizer, put . The decomposition matrix and Cartan matrix of a group algebra have entriesThe first numbers do not depend on the integral form: the Brauer character of its reduction is the ordinary character restricted to p-regular elements, and part 2(a) determines all composition multiplicities from this restriction.
For the assertion in (i), set . It is a submodule of the finite free module , hence is finite free over . There is a natural injective mapFor any homomorphism in the target, clearing the finitely many denominators of its values on an -basis of gives . Thus , and the map is surjective. Therefore , regarding this Hom space as a vector space. The original PDF supplies part (i), which is missing from the supplied TeX.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 138 5 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
For the preliminary definitions, a block is for a primitive central idempotent , and a module belongs to it when . For a semisimple algebra, the Artin–Wedderburn theorem identifies its blocks with the factors in its product decomposition. Each factor is a block of a finite-dimensional algebra.
We prove Ext separation of finite-length modules. The extension hypothesis is for simples in opposite sets. First, for a simple and a module of finite composition length with factors in , we have . Induct on the length of : for with simple, the long exact sequence of the Ext functor containswhose outer groups are zero. The same argument works with the two sets interchanged.
Now induct on the length of , with immediate. Take a simple quotient in . By induction, with factors in the respective sets. Suppose ; the other case is symmetric. Quotienting by givesThis splits by the preceding Ext vanishing. Let be the inverse image in of the chosen complementary copy of . Then , , and . Thus has only factors in , while has only factors in .
If two finite-length modules have factors in disjoint sets, any homomorphism between them is zero: a nonzero image would, by the Jordan–Hölder theorem, have a simple factor belonging to both sets. For any submodule of with factors in , projection onto is consequently zero, so . The analogous argument applies to . HenceIn particular both summands are preserved by every endomorphism of .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 138 5 b ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
We prove . The central block idempotents split every finite-dimensional module into its block components. A nonzero indecomposable representation, in particular an indecomposable projective module, has only one such component; otherwise these give a nontrivial direct-sum decomposition.
Every Jordan–Hölder factor of a module in a block belongs to that block, since its central idempotent acts as identity on submodules and quotients. Thus any two simple factors of the same projective indecomposable are in the same block. Applying this along the proposed chain yields .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ib Paper 2 2G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Let the torsion submodule of the module over a ring beThis is a submodule. Indeed, if and with , then because the scalar ring is an integral domain, and ; scalar multiples and additive inverses are handled similarly.
Take the quotient module and let be the quotient R-module homomorphism. It is torsion-free: if and , then , so for some . Since , this puts in and therefore .
Now let be torsion-free and let be an -module homomorphism. If and for , then , so torsion-freeness gives . Hence , and the universal property of a quotient module gives a unique homomorphismwith . Thus is the maximal torsion-free quotient of .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ib Paper 2 1G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Suppose first that is finitely generated. Its quotient is generated by the images of any finite generating set of . A principal ideal domain is Noetherian, so every submodule of the finitely generated -module is finitely generated; in particular, is finitely generated.
Conversely, supposeand is generated by the cosets . For any , its coset is an -linear combination of the , soExpressing this remainder in terms of the shows thatThus is finitely generated if and only if both the submodule and the quotient module are finitely generated.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 101 1 i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
An -module is Noetherian when every submodule is finitely generated, equivalently when every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes.
A free module is an -module with a basis: every element has a unique expression as a finite linear combination of basis elements.
A flat module is one for which the tensor functor is exact. Since tensor products are always right exact, it is equivalent to require that tensoring with preserve injections.
A projective module has the lifting property: for every surjection and every map , there is a map making the resulting triangle commute. Equivalently, is a direct summand of a free module.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 101 4 c i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
No. Give the x-adic filtration , take , and let . At the intersection filtration giveswhereas the induced filtration of givesThus intersection with a submodule need not equal the induced filtration.
Rees module 2026-10-06
The Rees module of an -module with respect to an ideal is , a graded module over the Rees ring . Generators of in degree zero generate this module. For , the graded submodule is finitely generated when is a Noetherian ring; a bound on its generators' degrees yields the Artin-Rees lemma.
Right ideal Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
A right ideal in a unital associative algebra is a vector subspace with , equivalently a submodule of the right regular module. It need not be a left ideal. Its finite generation refers to right multiplication by elements of .
Torsion submodule 2026-09-29
Uniform module Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
A nonzero module is uniform if every pair of nonzero submodules has nonzero intersection. Equivalently, every nonzero submodule is an essential submodule. A right Noetherian domain is uniform as a right module: if for nonzero , the right ideals , , form an infinite direct sum, contradicting the ascending chain condition.
Universal property of a quotient module 2026-09-29
If an R-module homomorphism vanishes on a submodule , there is a unique homomorphism satisfying , where is the quotient map. It is given by .
Young-symmetrizer tensor decomposition 2026-10-07
The standard-tableau right-ideal decomposition of , tensored over that algebra with , gives this direct sum of general linear group modules. With , the map is an isomorphism. Individual summands generally need not be symmetric group submodules; instead each is a Schur module for the commuting action.