For a module over an integral domain , its torsion submodule is
This is a submodule. If and with , then and ; also for every . The integral domain hypothesis supplies both the nonzero product and commutativity. These are the conventions of [ref].
A mixed example is the direct sum . If a nonzero integer kills , then . Conversely, kills every . Thus
The torsion submodule isolates the finite-order part while the quotient module keeps the independent integer directions. In general is a torsion-free module: if with , some kills , so kills .
The hypothesis matters. In the ring viewed as a module over itself, the elements and are killed by nonzero scalars and , but their sum is a unit and is killed by no nonzero scalar. Thus using arbitrary nonzero scalars in a ring with zero divisors need not give a submodule. A common broader convention uses regular elements of a ring as annihilators; the integral domain convention here avoids that ambiguity.
For a module over an integral domain , a torsion element is an with for some . This includes zero. Equivalently, its annihilator is a nonzero ideal. The torsion elements of a module form the torsion submodule.
For , computed annihilators are
For these three elements, the additive order of a group element is respectively , , and : these are the smallest positive integers killing them. Torsion over agrees exactly with finite additive order of a group element. Over a general integral domain, torsion concerns the chosen scalars instead; the polynomial module from a linear operator gives a torsion example whose nonzero elements have infinite additive order of a group element.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.