A single fluorophore creates a diffraction-broadened point-spread function, but its centre can be fitted much more precisely than that function's width. With Gaussian width and detected independent photons, the shot-noise limit is . Pixelation, background photons, dye orientation, motion blur, drift and label-to-target geometry impose additional uncertainty and systematic error. Localization precision is therefore not identical to either optical resolution or position accuracy.[ref]
Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes by Russell E. Thompson and others. 2002 localization analysis, photon-number scaling and effects of pixelation/background
In myosin-V tracking, localizing a label on one head or its lever arm distinguishes the paths of individual motor parts from the average motion of the whole motor. A trailing head that becomes the leading head travels roughly twice the stalk advance: about versus a roughly motor stride. A near-head label can therefore alternate a large movement with a pause while the partner head advances. Other lever-arm label positions give unequal alternating steps whose sum is approximately twice the stride. Those patterns support hand-over-hand walking rather than a simple inchworm model in which the same head remains in front. The label geometry is needed when interpreting individual step sizes.[ref]
Myosin V Walks Hand-Over-Hand: Single Fluorophore Imaging with 1.5-nm Localization by Ahmet Yildiz and others. 2003 study, labelled lever-arm step patterns and hand-over-hand versus inchworm discrimination
Super-resolution localization microscopy extends the same principle to a map containing many molecules by separating otherwise overlapping emitters in time. Sparse activation, blinking or transient binding yields individually fitted positions, which are accumulated. Dense sampling, registration and labelling specificity determine the final structural resolution; merely taking more photons from an unresolved simultaneous pair does not make it a single isolated emitter.
In PAINT, fluorescent probes bind transiently so that separated binding events can be localized and accumulated. DNA-PAINT uses reversible complementary-strand recognition at docking sites on a DNA nanostructure. The bound probe supplies a localized spot while freely diffusing probes contribute background; repeated visits build up a positional map, with replenishment rather than permanent reliance on one fluorophore. This is an imaging principle, not a requirement for a particular target sequence or preparation protocol.[ref]
Single-Molecule Kinetics and Super-Resolution Microscopy by Fluorescence Imaging of Transient Binding on DNA Origami. 2010 primary report, transient DNA binding and accumulated localization imaging of DNA nanostructures
Ralf Jungmann Created 2026-10-24 Updated 2026-11-05
Researcher in molecular imaging. Jungmann and collaborators used transient binding on DNA origami for single-molecule kinetics and super-resolution microscopy, connecting reversible molecular recognition with repeated localization measurements.[ref]
Super-resolution microscopy Created 2026-10-20 Updated 2026-11-05
Super-resolution microscopy recovers spatial detail beyond the conventional diffraction limit by acquiring information beyond a single ordinary image. Stimulated emission depletion microscopy confines detectable fluorescence with a depletion beam; photoactivated localization microscopy separates emitters in time and estimates each emitter's position before combining the estimates.
The distinction between finding one isolated emitter and resolving many adjacent emitters matters. An isolated point spread function can be localized more precisely than its width if enough photons are collected, but overlapping unknown emitters cannot simply be treated as isolated ones. Label density, photon shot noise and specimen motion therefore constrain the final optical resolution, even when the reconstructed image uses very small pixels.
