The terminal model of copolymerization represents a growing copolymer chain's addition kinetics using only the identity of its final monomeric unit. For two incoming monomers, there are two end types and four chain-growth propagation rate constants , where identifies the existing end and the incoming monomer. Earlier sequence history is omitted from this kinetic state description.[ref]
Radical Copolymerization Reactivity Ratios by IUPAC. Published technical Introduction, terminal-model assumption
At a fixed reacting-mixture composition, addition rates give a two-state Markov chain. With the monomer mole fractions and , the monomer reactivity ratios, its transition matrix isRows label the current terminal unit; columns label the newly added unit. Each row sums to one. This interprets a sequence at fixed feed and neglects initiation, termination and feed drift over the sampled run.
For an original example, take and . Then and both cross-addition probabilities are . The stationary distribution is , so the long-chain mean composition is equimolar, while equal consecutive units are favored. A run of type 1 has a geometric distribution with stopping probability and mean length 3. Independent equimolar placement would instead give mean run length 2. Mean composition alone does not determine sequence correlations.
The copolymer composition equation concerns the instantaneous incorporated composition implied by this model. Applying it over a finite conversion interval requires following changes in the reacting mixture. The IUPAC recommendation explicitly bases ratio estimation on conversion and composition observations at different starting feeds.[ref]
Radical Copolymerization Reactivity Ratios by IUPAC. Official recommendation announcement, measurement design
Historically, Frank R. Mayo and Frederick M. Lewis published a 1944 theoretical comparison of monomers with a study of styrene and methyl methacrylate.[ref]
Copolymerization. I. A Basis for Comparing the Behavior of Monomers in Copolymerization; The Copolymerization of Styrene and Methyl Methacrylate by Frank R. Mayo and Frederick M. Lewis. Publisher title, byline and publication record
A successful terminal-model fit is evidence about a chosen kinetic representation, not proof that every chemical influence vanishes beyond the last unit. Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.