Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-18
The Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix compares the left-handed unitary matrices that diagonalize the up-type and down-type Yukawa matrices. Its rows label up quarks, charm quarks and top quarks; its columns label down quarks, strange quarks and bottom quarks. In the weak charged current, the coefficient of is . A single CKM matrix therefore connects quark masses, flavour-changing decay amplitudes, and CP violation.
Write and . An exactly unitary matrix with three mixing angles and one CP-violating phase is
This convention agrees with Makoto Kobayashi's account of three-generation quark mixing.[ref]
The Christenson-Cronin-Fitch-Turlay kaon CP violation experiment established the phenomenon that required an explanation. Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa showed that two-generation quark mixing cannot supply it, whereas adding a third quark generation permits an irreducible weak phase. Their 1973 paper also considered additional fields as alternative mechanisms; the three-generation conclusion concerns CP violation from the minimal unitary quark mixing mechanism.[ref]
A common weak phase makes CP violation across mesons testable through the BABAR time-dependent CP violation experiment. It does not explain the cosmic baryon asymmetry.[ref]
One half went to Yoichiro Nambu for discovering the mechanism of spontaneous symmetry breaking in subatomic physics. One quarter each went to Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa for explaining broken symmetry through a mechanism requiring at least three families of quarks.[ref]
Quark rephasing and CP conservation Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-18
For nondegenerate quark masses, changing the constant quantum phases of quark fields preserves their diagonal mass terms. Adopt the convention
Such quantum field rephasings alter individual entries of the CKM matrix without altering physics. Physical CP symmetry in this mixing sector means that some allowed convention makes the CKM matrix real. Toshihide Maskawa emphasized the distinction between complex entries and an irremovable CP-violating phase.[ref]
Here is a constructive two-generation argument. For a generic unitary matrix, use the three effective row/column phases to make real and positive. Column orthogonality then forces to be real and negative. Row normalization leaves just the real rotation specified by the Cabibbo angle. Zero entries are limiting cases and introduce no weak phase. Thus two-generation quark mixing cannot violate CP symmetry through this mechanism, even when its entries initially look complex.
For three quark generations, the Jarlskog invariant provides an obstruction to repeating that construction: all four phase factors cancel from its defining quartet. If its imaginary part is nonzero, no choice of quantum field rephasings can make every entry real. With nondegenerate quark masses, this proves physical CP violation in the mixing sector. This argument concerns the weak interaction; it does not dispose of the separate Strong CP problem.