Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 29 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the following fixed-number form of a logarithmic estimate: for chosen logarithms of fixed nonzero algebraic numbers , a nonzero form with integer coefficients satisfies , for fixed positive constants . This follows from the Baker lower bound for a homogeneous linear form in logarithms.
By the Dirichlet unit theorem, write units as and , with finitely many roots of unity and fixed fundamental units. If the unit rank is zero, there are already only finitely many choices. Otherwise put . The real logarithmic embedding of the free unit group has full rank and lies in the product-formula hyperplane. Equivalence of norms in that finite-dimensional space shows that a unit with exponent size has some archimedean conjugate of modulus at most : a large positive logarithmic coordinate forces a comparably large negative one, and a large negative coordinate itself suffices.
Interchanging the two terms if necessary, choose such a conjugate for . At this embedding the equation makes with . For large define the logarithm near one. It is nonzero because , andOn fixed branches it isfor an integer . The bound on follows from summing the fixed imaginary parts and then reducing to the near-one branch. There are only finitely many possible embeddings and roots of unity, so the stated lower bound applies uniformly with coefficients . It contradicts the exponential upper bound when is large. Hence the exponents are bounded and in . This is the unit equation over a number field proof; “unit” here means an algebraic-integer unit, not an arbitrary nonzero field element.
For the Thue theorem, let be irreducible homogeneous of degree and let be fixed. In a splitting field , write with distinct roots. Choose a fixed integer so that each is integral and is a nonzero integer. For a solution the nonzero algebraic integers satisfy . Their principal ideals therefore divide a fixed ideal and have only finitely many possibilities. For each occurring principal ideal choose a generator , so with a unit.
Any three distinct roots give the identityDivide by the third term and absorb the finitely many generator ratios into the coefficients. This is a fixed-coefficient unit equation in and , so it has finitely many solutions for each generator choice. Thus has finitely many values. The relation fixes a rational direction whenever an integer solution exists; simply gives . On each such direction, for a primitive integer pair, and allows finitely many . This proves the desired finiteness. When , irreducibility excludes a nonzero rational root direction, leaving only .
The argument also proves finiteness for any binary form with at least three distinct projective roots: irreducibility was used only to guarantee distinct roots and to dispose of the zero-value case. A rational invertible change of variables can move every projective root away from infinity; after clearing its fixed denominators, the resulting pairs lie in an integer lattice and the same proof applies. This stronger nonzero-value version will apply to the binomial forms in question 6.
Thue theorem 2026-10-14
An irreducible integral binary form of degree at least three has only finitely many integral solutions at a fixed nonzero value. Factor the form in a splitting field. Each linear factor generates an ideal dividing a fixed ideal, so it is one of finitely many chosen factors times a unit. The linear relation among any three distinct factors gives a unit equation over a number field, hence finitely many ratios and finitely many rational directions. Homogeneity and the fixed nonzero value then bound the scale on each direction. The same argument works for a binary form with at least three distinct projective roots, even without irreducibility.