Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 75 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use incompressible ideal MHD at scales above the ion skin depth, a strong uniform mean field, and a statistically steady local energy cascade with mean flux per unit mass. Assume balanced counterpropagating wave populations, comparable velocity and magnetic amplitudes in velocity units, and no additional scale-dependent alignment or intermittency correction. Write and introduce the fluctuation Elsässer variables . Their equations areOnly opposite populations distort one another. A single population has no leading nonlinear self-interaction, so the balance assumption is essential to a one-amplitude cascade estimate.
Let denote the typical balanced amplitude and let be coherence lengths relative to the local mean field. The Alfvén wave time and eddy turnover time areFor , one counterpropagating encounter changes the packet fractionally by order . Assume phases decorrelate between encounters. After encounters, random accumulation is of order ; an order-one change requires . The weak wave cascade time is thereforeWeakness by itself does not prove this random walk estimate; phase decorrelation and the interaction geometry are additional assumptions.
For the Iroshnikov-Kraichnan spectrum, impose isotropy, , in addition to . Then andHence . A local shell-integrated turbulent energy spectrum has , , soThe isotropy is imposed phenomenologically; a strong guide field actually distinguishes directions and does not force this isotropic picture. The spectrum is not an automatically valid asymptotic result for every strongly magnetized cascade.
For the anisotropic weak Alfvénic cascade, keep approximately fixed while cascading to smaller , and require . This geometry follows from resonant three-wave Alfvén interactions: frequency conservation together with parallel-wavenumber conservation makes one member of an oppositely propagating resonant triad have zero parallel wavenumber, so the propagating modes retain their parallel wavenumber in the leading resonant transfer. Thus there is no leading parallel cascade in this ideal weak-wave ordering. Using the fixed parallel scale,Therefore . For the one-dimensional perpendicular spectrum, givesUnlike the isotropic estimate, the parallel length does not decrease with the perpendicular length. Since , the interactions become stronger down the cascade. If at outer perpendicular scale , the weak approximation breaks at . This is the weak-to-strong transition of an Alfvénic cascade.
For Goldreich–Sridhar turbulence, abandon the weak-collision estimate and impose critical balance, . The local cascade is strong, with transfer time of order one eddy turnover time. ThenThe parallel scale is set dynamically, not held fixed:At smaller scales grows, so the eddies are increasingly elongated along the local magnetic field. Strong turbulence does not mean : small transverse amplitudes can still be strong when the eddies are sufficiently anisotropic to satisfy critical balance. Imbalance, alignment or nonlocal interactions would require different cascade reasoning.
Finally, in the usual isotropic hydrodynamic Kolmogorov 1941 theory inertial-range argument, the only relevant dimensional quantities are and . With and , writing forces , . This uses the physical assumptions that outer-scale, viscous and intermittency effects do not supply another leading dependence; dimensions alone are not a proof of those assumptions.
A magnetic guide field supplies the independent speed , and anisotropy adds independent parallel lengths. Even before adding anisotropy, dimensions permitwith arbitrary dimensionless . For example reproduces the isotropic Iroshnikov-Kraichnan spectrum estimate. This dimensional freedom of an MHD spectrum explains why propagation, decorrelation, anisotropy and cascade-time assumptions must select among the spectra: purely dimensional considerations do not select a unique MHD exponent.