Weighted graph Laplacian Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-20
For a finite undirected graph without self-loops, give each edge a symmetric nonnegative weight . In the weighted graph, set for an edge and zero otherwise, and with all other entries zero. The Weighted graph Laplacian is
Each edge appears once in the quadratic form. For the path graph with weights and ,
The Weighted graph Laplacian is still a positive semidefinite matrix. Its kernel consists of vectors constant on each connected component of a graph after zero-weight edges are removed: an edge of weight zero imposes no constraint. In an electrical network, taking the weights to be electrical conductances makes the total power dissipated by Joule heating when gives the voltages at the vertices. This physical interpretation explains why stronger connections penalize disagreement more heavily.[ref]
Weighted Hamilton cycle 2026-10-14
A weighted Hamilton cycle is a Hamilton cycle in a weighted graph, with cost equal to the sum of its traversed edge weights. Here weights represent symmetric nonnegative costs, rather than conductances. Asking whether a Hamilton cycle exists is a feasibility question; asking for the cheapest one is an instance of the travelling salesman problem. A complete graph supplies every possible connection between distinct vertices, making feasibility automatic for , while choosing the cheapest visiting order remains a separate mathematical optimization problem.
Figure 1.
A fictitious weighted graph on four vertices: its three Hamilton cycles, identified under reversal and cyclic rotation, have costs 14, 19 and 21
. Details.
Assign the complete graph the symmetric edge costs , , , , and , in arbitrary units. Fix the start at and identify each Hamilton cycle with its reverse. The three possibilities are
These exhaust the possibilities: the permutations of the other three vertices give orders, paired into three reversals. Hence the perimeter tour really is optimal for this toy instance. The diagram's geometric lengths are not costs, and no triangle inequality is assumed.
The usefulness of this model is to distinguish visiting required sites from covering required connections. If tasks are assigned to vertices and the route must return after one visit to each, a weighted Hamilton cycle captures the ordering requirement. If the job instead requires each edge once, the relevant object is an Euler circuit. The shortest path problem asks only for a cheapest route between specified endpoints. A 1954 primary research paper gave a concrete motivation for the travelling salesman problem: certify that a particular tour through 49 cities has minimum road-distance cost.[ref]
These are abstract route models. If a cost stands for a whole graph path through an underlying network, travelling between consecutive task vertices can pass through intermediate network vertices more than once. One visit per task therefore does not imply one visit per physical junction. One-way connections require a directed graph; changing costs or extra timing constraints require a richer model than the fixed symmetric toy instance.