Substitution of the proposed sine and cosine displacements into either linearized equation gives . Thus
These are signed angular frequencies, not two positive frequency magnitudes. To first order, with ,
The orbit is therefore a circle of radius about at this order. The positive root runs counterclockwise; the negative root runs clockwise and has the larger magnitude. A positive charge in alone circles clockwise. Here the spring permits an additional counterclockwise mode by providing inward force against its magnetic force.
Figure 1.
Opposite-handed circular modes about the shifted spring equilibrium
. Details.
Direct variation of the Lagrangian gives
For a static configuration, and . Since and the radius is positive,
The magnetic force vanishes at rest and does not shift this equilibrium. In canonical variables it has but , rather than zero canonical angular momentum.
The canonical momenta are
Taking the Legendre transform gives
Its four Hamilton equations, in a polar chart with , are
Canonical angular momentum includes the vector-potential contribution and is not simply mechanical angular momentum.
Choose electric scalar potential and the symmetric gauge , whose curl is . Minimal coupling gives . Since and ,
The magnetic term is velocity dependent; it is not an ordinary position-only potential.
The new kinetic matrix is diagonal, giving
For the first mode, : the line between the centres stays vertical, both centres translate together, and . For the second, : the outer hoop stays still while the inner hoop rolls within it, with . These coordinate motions are independent only at the retained quadratic order.
Let be the small hoop's absolute spin angle with the same angular sign convention. Equating the two contact-point velocities cancels the large hoop centre's translation. The remaining tangential equality is
This rolling constraint inside a moving circular track adds small-hoop rotational energy . At quadratic order its cross term cancels the translational cross term in part a. The potential is unchanged, so
Static friction enforces rolling; ideal no-slip contact dissipates no energy.
The Euler-Lagrange equations from the quadratic Lagrangian are
For a normal mode proportional to , let . Nonzero amplitudes require
Hence
The corresponding amplitude ratios are . The lower-frequency mode has , with the angles in phase; the higher-frequency mode has , with opposite signs. The small hoop's spin remains zero in both modes.
Measure both angles from the downward vertical, as in the source diagram. With upward , the cylinder centres are
The large hoop has central inertia and angular velocity , while the small hoop has no spin in this part. Translation and rotation therefore give
Thus . Counting each angle and velocity as first order, replacing the cosine in the velocity product by one changes only fourth-order terms. Expanding the potential and dropping its constant gives
Assume and temperature-independent for the local model. The zero-field stationary points obey
For , the favoured ordered sign is opposite to . The nonzero extrema first appear at ; their existence is not yet a coexistence condition. To find the equilibrium transition, require both and . Substituting into the free energy gives
Hence
At coexistence the entire potential factorizes:
It has equal minima at zero and separated by a barrier. Every fixed nonzero cubic coefficient produces a first-order transition in this quartic model, with a finite magnetization jump before the quadratic coefficient reaches zero.
For , the ordered minimum is metastable and zero is globally stable. For , the ordered state is globally stable and zero is metastable. At the zero minimum loses local stability. Thus the spinodals are and , distinct from . For , the opposite-sign nonzero state can also be a local minimum, but the cubic term favours the state of sign .
Figure 1.
First-order coexistence, metastability and the magnetization jump in a cubic-quartic Landau model
. Details.
If , the transition is shifted to . With constant and , the entropy jump from the disordered to ordered phase is , giving a latent heat of magnitude . As , the jump and shift vanish and the original continuous transition is recovered.
A genuine zero-field uniaxial ferromagnet with exact spin-reversal Z2 symmetry forbids this cubic term. The modified model therefore presumes that symmetry has been changed; it must not be presented as a symmetry-allowed correction for the original ferromagnet.
Differentiate the equation of state at fixed temperature:
Above the transition, zero-field equilibrium has . Below it the stable pure phases have . Thus
This is the mean-field magnetic-susceptibility amplitude ratio. Below the transition, take a one-sided response in a selected ordered phase: the globally minimizing magnetization switches discontinuously between opposite phases when crosses zero. Its two-sided derivative at precisely zero field is therefore not the finite pure-phase magnetic susceptibility used in the ratio.
Equilibrium requires . On the critical isotherm , so
Here is defined by at the critical temperature, or equivalently . The positive quartic coefficient selects a stable equilibrium, including the flat but stable zero-field thermodynamic critical point.
The expansion is a local phenomenological description in a small scalar order parameter near a transition. Its coefficients summarize microscopic physics and generally depend smoothly on temperature. At zero field, spin-reversal Z2 symmetry requires even powers of magnetization; the conjugate field supplies the term . The additive does not affect minimization with respect to .
For the ordinary continuous-transition quartic model, ensures stability, and the quadratic coefficient changes sign, with . If vanishes or is negative, stabilizing higher powers are required and the phase structure can change. Treating one uniform magnetization neglects spatial gradients, fluctuations and domains; the resulting exponents are predictions of mean-field theory.
Use the amplitude placement in the original PDF: . Introduce the actual peak and , so . Its derivatives satisfy
The static equation is . Matching the constant and terms gives
Changing the sign of leaves the profile unchanged. If is instead defined as an outside prefactor, as in the held TeX transcription, its value is , not the PDF's . This notation discrepancy does not change the physical profile.
The nonconstant positive power-law nonlinear Klein-Gordon pulse is even, smooth, has peak at zero and decays as . The requested sketches below compare several powers with illustrative . For odd , its negative is also a solution. A separate constant branch occurs for : the positive equilibrium has , or in the PDF convention. The zero solution is another equilibrium, obtained as a limiting profile rather than finite positive .
Figure 1.
Localized scalar pulses for several nonlinear powers, and Lorentz-contracted travelling snapshots
. Details.
Now apply the Lorentz boost with rapidity to the static field. It gives
For positive , the centre moves to the right at , with speed one the wave-speed unit. The peak stays and the width contracts by . The shape translates without changing in time. This establishes a travelling solitary pulse; it does not by itself prove stability or elastic multi-pulse scattering.
The Euler-Lagrange field equation is . Therefore
Put , , and . The chain rule gives and . Cross terms cancel and , so
Thus the boosted scalar field is another solution for any constant rapidity. The nonlinear term in the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation is unchanged because it is a local function of the scalar itself.
A locally invertible time-independent canonical transformation is canonical when
The proposed coordinates are locally independent only for , since their configuration-space Jacobian has determinant . Work on one sign branch of .
The mixed brackets first require
The last bracket condition is
Expressing in the coordinates turns this into . Thus their shift one-form is closed and locally is the differential of an arbitrary smooth function . The canonical momenta for a squared coordinate therefore have the general local form
Conversely, any such satisfies all bracket conditions. This does not give one nonsingular transformation through , or identify the two sign branches globally.
Choose . Then
In canonical coordinates, the Poisson bracket is
In particular, , , and . Hence and the coordinate–coordinate and momentum–momentum brackets vanish.
The chain rule along a Hamiltonian trajectory gives
The Poisson bracket of time-dependent conserved quantities follows by defining . The ordinary product rule and Jacobi identity imply
To see the Hamiltonian part explicitly, Jacobi rearranges to . Therefore implies , even when the conserved functions depend explicitly on time.
Differentiate and substitute the previous momentum equation:
For a planar vector, , which gives the two component equations with the printed signs.
For circular relative motion of a neutral Coulomb pair of separation radius , and . Thus
Since , the two signed frequencies are
One is positive and the other negative. At they give the two senses of an ordinary Coulomb circular orbit; equal masses remove the term linear in from their average. With negligible Coulomb attraction and , the branches approach and , the appropriate signed free cyclotron limits.
The actual particle paths follow by integrating the centre-of-mass velocity:
Both particles move on circles about the same fixed guiding centre with a constant separation and common signed frequency, with a possible relative phase reversal encoded by a negative coefficient. Their mechanical centre of mass also generally circles. This is consistent with magnetic deflection plus a central mutual force; central interaction alone does not eliminate the external Lorentz forces.
Interpret as the zero-pseudomomentum sector, rather than assuming the mechanical centre of mass is at rest. Define . Hamilton's equations are
For example, differentiating the relative kinetic term with respect to gives because the cross-product matrix is antisymmetric. Hamilton's minus sign then gives the positive cross-product term in . The Coulomb force is attractive. A change to a moving frame need not preserve a pure magnetic external field, so setting is a restriction on the chosen solution family.
For this neutral Coulomb pair in a uniform magnetic field, the reduced Lagrangian gives the canonical momenta
Invert these relations and take the Legendre transform. The velocity-linear terms cancel against their momentum contributions, giving
There is no explicit time dependence, so . There is no dependence on , so . The distinction between kinetic momentum and magnetic pseudomomentum matters: the conserved vector is , not generally . The mechanical centre-of-mass momentum generally varies as the separation changes. A neutral pair can therefore have accelerated centre-of-mass motion in a magnetic field.
Use the magnetic-coupling convention of the supplied Hamiltonian; electromagnetic unit factors are absorbed into the stated and . Let and , so
The kinetic energy separates into . The symmetric gauge coupling becomes
The scalar triple product identity gives
Discarding times that total derivative, which changes endpoint terms and canonical momenta but not the trajectories, leaves

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact