Luckywin được biết đến như một nền tảng cá cược trực tuyến uy tín tại thị trường châu Á, bắt đầu đi vào hoạt động từ năm 2019 và không ngừng mở rộng sức ảnh hưởng. Thương hiệu này thu hút đông đảo người chơi nhờ kho trò chơi phong phú, từ cá cược thể thao đến casino trực tuyến, đi kèm mức tỷ lệ hấp dẫn và cạnh tranh. Bên cạnh đó, Luckywin chú trọng đầu tư công nghệ bảo mật tiên tiến, đảm bảo an toàn tuyệt đối cho mọi giao dịch.
In today’s fast-growing digital world, professionals who understand online marketing and technology play a vital role in helping businesses succeed. One such professional is **Wajahat Hussain Aziz**, a Pakistani digital marketing expert known for his work in SEO, web development, and online branding.
**Wajahat Hussain Aziz** is recognized asa **digital marketer, SEO specialist, and web developer** based in Pakistan. He has built his career around helping businesses improve their online visibility and achieve sustainable growth through effective digital strategies.
Wajahat Hussain Aziz is the founder of a digital marketing agency operating under the brand **Wajahat Writes**. His agency focuses on delivering long-term digital solutions for startups, entrepreneurs, and established businesses. The services are designed to enhance brand presence, increase organic traffic, and improve overall online performance.
According to publicly available information, Wajahat Hussain Aziz has an academic background in **computer science and project management**. This educational foundation supports his technical expertise and structured approach to managing digital projects efficiently.
Wajahat Hussain Aziz emphasizes ethical SEO practices, continuous learning, and adapting to evolving digital trends. His goal is to help businesses grow organically while maintaining quality, credibility, and measurable results.
In summary, **Wajahat Hussain Aziz** is a dedicated digital marketing professional specializing in SEO, web development, and online marketing. Through his agency and consulting services, he continues to support businesses in building strong digital foundations and achieving long-term success.
Mined Bitcoin in 2010. Stopped mining because Ithought it wouldn't be profitable. Lost computer. Dreading the regret I'll feel when it hits $100k during the next 10x surge.
As System-on-Chip (SoC) architectures incorporate billions of transistors, the ability to accurately predict design properties has become paramount 5. Early-stage architectural design and physical synthesis rely heavily on robust models that quantify the relationship between logiccomplexity and the communication requirements between disparate system blocks.
The foundational model in this domain is Rent's Rule 1. Discovered empirically by E. F. Rent at IBM and later formalized by Landman and Russo 2, the rule establishes a power-law relationship between the number of external signal connections (terminals) to alogic block and the number of internal components (gates or standard cells) it contains:
Where: • T: Number of external terminals (pins) of the block. • g: Number of internal logic components (gates/cells). • K: Rent's empirical constant (average pins per block). • p: Rent exponent (0<p<1).
While Rent's Rule is an indispensable tool for wirelength 3,4 and placement optimization, its empirical origins lead to inherent limitations—especially when applied to modern, heterogeneous architectures. This paper discusses New Law 5 and a new generalization, which addresses these shortcomings by incorporating explicit structural constraints, extending its utility to the next generation of complex computing systems. ________________________________________ 2. Overview of Rent's Rule and Current Drawbacks 2.1. Applications and Interpretation
Rent's Rule describes a statistical self-similarity in digital systems. The Rent exponent (p) provides insight into a design'stopological complexity: • p≈0.4: Highly regular structures. • p≈0.5: Structured designs with high locality (e.g., SRAM). • p≈0.75: "Random logic" or complex, unstructured designs.
The power-law form suffers from two primary drawbacks 6,8: 1. Terminal Constraint Deviation (Region II) 7: The power law breaks down as partitions approach the total system size (>25% of the chip). Physical I/O pins are finite; thus, the log-log plot flattens as g approaches N. 2. Undefined Constants: There is an absence of methodology relating design metrics to the empirical constants K and p.
________________________________________ 3. The New Rule: Generalization for Autonomic Systems
We utilized a graph-mathematical model to generalize Rent’s Rule, specifically addressing its limitations when applied to autonomic systems. We demonstrated that the classical power-law form of Rent’s Rule is valid only under the restrictive conditions where the system contains a large number of blocks, and the number g of internal components in a block is much smaller than the total number of components (N) in the entire system 9.
The generalized formulation, referred to as the New Graph-based Rule, extends the applicability of the scaling law across the entire range of partition sizes, including the problematic Rent's Region II. The New Rule is expressed as 9,10,11:
Where: • T is the number of external terminals for the block partition. • N is the total number of components in the system. • g is the number of components in the block partition. • t represents the averagenumber of pins of a component in the system. • Pg is the generalized Rent exponent, derived by the described graph-partitioning method.
The rule was derived by modeling the system asa graph, where each component is represented asavertex, and each net is represented asa tree connecting its components.
Figure 1. "All Net Components Are in the Block" illustrates the case when a net connects three components (A, B, and C) and is represented asa net tree. In this example, all net components are in the same block; thus, there is no need for a block external terminal—none of the net edges exit the block.
Figure 2. "An external terminal" illustrates the same case, but only components A and B are in the same block, while component C is located in another block. In this scenario, an edge exits the block to connect to component C, necessitating a block external terminal for the net under consideration.
Initially, we assumed that each block has randomly assigned components. Under this assumption, the probability Q′ that a given pin of a given component has an edge to another component outside of the block is:
If the net has only two components to connect (the net tree is a single edge), the above formula is straightforward. In this case, the edge goes outside the block, creating one block terminal. If the net has m>2 pins to connect, we still have only one outside terminal—all components of the net within the block are connected by an internal net-tree, requiring only one tree edge to exit the block.
Because the component under consideration has t pins on average, the probability Q that the component will have t edges (block terminals) to components in other blocks is:
The drawback of formula [2] is the assumption of random component assignment. In reality, blocks are not designed randomly; highly connected components are partitioned into the same block to minimize communication overhead. Therefore, formula [2] produces conservative results. To account for the effect of optimized partitioning that minimizes terminals, we introduce a correction constant Pg<1 (analogous to the Rent exponent), which reduces the estimated number of terminals:
• Case 1 (g=1): Simplifies to T=t, matching classical expectations. • Case 2 (g=N/2): Yields the maximum terminal count, reflecting the peak communication requirement when a system is halved. • Case 3 (g=N): T=0. This accurately models Region II, asaclosed system has no external signals.
Above, we utilized a graph-mathematical model to generalize Rent’s Rule. We will show that if we use ahypergraphmodel of the system, we can further improve the accuracy of the generalized Rent’s Rule by taking into account an additional and known design property: the averagenumber of components, m, that a net connects.
Let’s represent a net that connects m pins asa hyperedge, instead of a tree as used in the previous graph-based model. Note that m is a known design property and is the average value that can be obtained for any real design.
Figure 3. "All three components and the hyperedge are within the Block" illustrates the case when a net connects three components (A, B, and C) and is represented asa hyperedge (an oval encompassing all components). In this example, all net components are in the same block, and there is no need for a block external terminal—the hyperedge does not cross the block boundary.
Again, let’s initially assume that each block has randomly assigned components. Then, the probability V′′ that a given pin of a given component within the block is connected to another component within that same block is:
The probability V′ that the remaining m−1vertices (components) within the hyperedge are all located in the block (resulting in no block terminal for this net) is:
Because the component under consideration has t pins on average, the probability Q that the component will have t hyperedges (block terminals) connecting to components in other blocks is:
The above formula reflects the physical reality that the more components of a net are located within the block, the lower the probability that the net will exit the block. If all m components of a net are in the block, the net requires no block terminal. With g components in the block, the number of expected block terminals is:
Again, the drawback of formula [3] is the assumption of random component assignment. In reality, highly connected components are partitioned together to minimize external terminals. Thus, formula [3] produces conservative results. To account for optimized partitioning, we introduce a correction constant Ph<1 (similar to Pg) to reduce the estimated number of terminals:
The following final points support the justification of the new rules: • Experimental Alignment: They provide a superior match to experimental data across all regions. • Convergence: Terminal counts are close to Rent’s predictions when g is small. • Structural Commonality: There is a fundamental commonality in the rule structures; they can be effectively approximated by Rent’s Rule for very small g.
The proposed New Rules resolve long-standing issues in VLSI modeling by explicitly incorporating N (system size), t (average pins), and m (net fan-out). By naturally constraining terminal counts at g=N, these rules provide a mathematically sound bridge across both Region I and Region II of Rent'scurve. ________________________________________ References
1. Rent, E.F. (1960): Original discovery (often an internal IBMmemorandum).
2. Landman, L.A. and Russo, R.L. (1971): "On Pin Versus Block Relationship for Partitions of LogicGraphs," IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. C-20, no. 12, pp. 1469-1479.
4. Heller, W.R., Hsi, C. and Mikhail, W.F. (1978): "Chip-Level Physical Design: An Overview," IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 163-176.
6. Sutherland, I.E. and Oosterhout, W.J. (2001): "The Futures of Design: Interconnections," ACM/IEEE Design AutomationConference (DAC), pp. 15-20.
7. Davis, J. A. and Meindl, J. D. (2000): "A Hierarchical Interconnect Model for Deep Submicron Integrated Circuits," IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2068-2073.
8. Stroobandt, D. A. and Van Campenhout, J. (2000): "The Geometry of VLSI Interconnect," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 535-546.
9. TETELBAUM, A. (1995). "Generalizations of Rent's Rule", in Proc. of 27th IEEE Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, Starkville, Mississippi, USA, March 1995, pp. 011-016.
10. TETELBAUM, A. (1995). "Estimations of Layout Parameters of Hierarchical Systems", in Proc. of 27th IEEE Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, Starkville, Mississippi, USA, March 1995, pp. 123-128.
11. TETELBAUM, A. (1995). "Estimation of the Graph Partitioning for a Hierarchical System", in Proc. of the Seventh SIAM Conference on Parallel Processing for Scientific Computing, San Francisco, California, USA, February 1995, pp. 500-502. ________________________________________
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable asa static site.