Puriya Updated 2025-07-16
Homeschooling Updated 2025-07-16
Mining pool Updated 2025-07-16
Kelvin Updated 2025-07-16
List of technology companies Updated 2025-07-16
Louisa Gross Horwitz Prize Updated 2025-07-16
minutephysics Updated 2025-07-16
Progressive tax Updated 2025-07-16
Tower defense Updated 2025-07-16
Ciro Santilli really likes this genre.
Venture capitalist Updated 2025-07-16
Bibliography:
- Something Ventured (2011) documentary
Yakuake Updated 2025-07-16
Carbon isotope Updated 2025-07-16
Cell cycle Updated 2025-07-16
Countable set Updated 2025-07-16
Open license Updated 2025-07-16
Quantum entanglement Updated 2025-07-16
Quantum entanglement is often called spooky/surprising/unintuitive, but they key question is to understand why.
To understand that, you have to understand why it is fundamentally impossible for the entangled particle pair be in a predefined state according to experiments done e.g. where one is deterministically yes and the other deterministically down.
In other words, why local hidden-variable theory is not valid.
How to generate entangled particles:
- particle decay, notably pair production
- for photons, notably: spontaneous parametric down-conversion, e.g.: www.youtube.com/watch?v=tn1sEaw1K2k "Shanni Prutchi Construction of an Entangled Photon Source" by HACKADAY (2015). Estimatd price: 5000 USD.
Contains the clearest Bell test experiment description seen so far.
It clearly describes the photon-based 22.5, 45 degree/85%/15% probability photon polarization experiment and its result conceptually.
It does not mention spontaneous parametric down-conversion but that's what they likely hint at.
Done in Collaboration with 3Blue1Brown.
Question asking further clarification on why the 100/85/50 thing is surprising: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/357039/why-is-the-quantum-venn-diagram-paradox-considered-a-paradox/597982#597982
Quantum Mechanics: Animation explaining quantum physics by Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky (2013)
Source. Usual Eugene, good animations, and not too precise explanations :-) youtu.be/iVpXrbZ4bnU?t=922 describes a conceptual spin entangled electron-positron pair production Stern-Gerlach experiment as a Bell test experiments. The 85% is mentioned, but not explained at all.Quantum Entanglement Lab by Scientific American (2013)
Source. The hosts interview Professor Enrique Galvez of Colgate University who shows briefly the optical table setup without great details, and then moves to a whiteboard explanation. Treats the audience as stupid, doesn't say the keywords spontaneous parametric down-conversion and Bell's theorem which they clearly allude to. You can even them showing a two second footage of the professor explaining the rotation experiments and the data for it, but that's all you get. Yi people Updated 2025-07-16
Cell structure Updated 2025-07-16
python/numpy/fft_cheat.py Updated 2025-07-16
History of the Fourier series Updated 2025-07-16
First published by Fourier in 1807 to solve the heat equation.
Unlisted articles are being shown, click here to show only listed articles.