Ciro Santilli @cirosantilli 37

Because of edit wars and encyclopedic tone requirements. See also: Wikipedia.

Thus OurBigBook.com.

Considering e.g. Newton's laws of motion, you take a system that is a function of time $f(t)$, e.g. the position of many point particles, and then you reverse the speeds of all particles, then $f(-t)$ is a solution to that.

The complex analogue of the special orthogonal group, i.e. the subgroup of the unitary group with determinant equals exactly 1 instead of an arbitrary complex number with absolute value equal 1 as is the case for the unitary group.

I guess you also have to change the sign of the gravitational constant?

There are only boring examples of taking an uncomputable language and converting it into a number?

One of the most simple to state undecidable problems.

The reason that it is undecidable is that you can repeat each matrix any number of times, so there isn't a finite number of possibilities to check.

Sequence of genes under a single promoter. For an example, see E. Coli K-12 MG1655 operon thrLABC.

A single operon may produce multiple different transcription units depending on certain conditions, see: operon vs transcription unit.

Anything that is not in the Pali Canon has basically zero chance of having come from Buddha or his immediate followers.

Nothing makes the fact that your life is an illusion clearer than animations of molecular biology processes. You just have no idea what is going on inside your own body right now!

And don't get Ciro Santilli started on the brain and the impossibility of free will.

And yet, we live, oblivious to all of it.

Amazing creators:

This is very widely used in courses as of 2020, it became kind of the default book.

Unfortunately, this approach bores Ciro Santilli to death. Or perhaps is too just advanced for him to appreciate. Either of those.

800+ pages.

She's truly passionate about health research and keeping healthy, almost obsessed by it. Also she's strong willed, and energetic. Good traits for founding 23andMe.

As www.nytimes.com/2017/11/18/style/anne-wojcicki-23andme-genetics.html puts it well: