Derivation of the quantum electrodynamics Lagrangian by 
Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-06-02 +Created 1970-01-01
Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-06-02 +Created 1970-01-01Like the rest of the Standard Model Lagrangian, this can be split into two parts:
- spacetime symmetry: reaches the derivation of the Dirac equation, but has no interactions
- add the internal symmetry to add interactions, which reaches the full equation
Deriving the qED Lagrangian by Dietterich Labs (2018)
Source. As mentioned at the start of the video, he starts with the Dirac equation Lagrangian derived in a previous video. It has nothing to do with electromagnetism specifically.
He notes that that Dirac Lagrangian, besides being globally Lorentz invariant, it also also has a global invariance.
However, it does not have a local invariance if the transformation depends on the point in spacetime.
He doesn't mention it, but I think this is highly desirable, because in general local symmetries of the Lagrangian imply conserved currents, and in this case we want conservation of charges.
To fix that, he adds an extra gauge field (a field of matrices) to the regular derivative, and the resulting derivative has a fancy name: the covariant derivative.
Then finally he notes that this gauge field he had to add has to transform exactly like the electromagnetic four-potential!
So he uses that as the gauge, and also adds in the Maxwell Lagrangian in the same go. It is kind of a guess, but it is a natural guess, and it turns out to be correct.
Richard Feynman Quantum Electrodynamics Lecture at University of Auckland (1979) by Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-06-02 +Created 1970-01-01
Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-06-02 +Created 1970-01-016 hour lecture, where he tries to explain it to an audience that does not know any modern physics. This is a noble effort.
Part of The Douglas Robb Memorial Lectures lecture series.
Feynman apparently also made a book adaptation: QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. That book is basically word by word the same as the presentation, including the diagrams.
According to www.feynman.com/science/qed-lectures-in-new-zealand/ the official upload is at www.vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8 and Vega does show up as a watermark on the video (though it is too pixilated to guess without knowing it), a project that has been discontinued and has has a non-permissive license. Newbs.
4 parts:This talk has the merit of being very experiment oriented on part 2, big kudos: how to teach and learn physics
- Part 1: is saying "photons exist"
- Part 2: is amazing, and describes how photons move as a sum of all possible paths, not sure if it is relativistic at all though, and suggests that something is minimized in that calculation (the action)
- Part 3: is where he hopelessly tries to explain the crucial part of how electrons join the picture in a similar manner to how photons do.He does make the link to light, saying that there is a function which gives the amplitude for a photon going from A to B, where A and B are spacetime events.And then he mentions that there is a similar function for an electron to go from A to B, but says that that function is too complicated, and gives no intuition unlike the photon one.He does not mention it, but P and E are the so called propagators.This is likely the path integral formulation of QED.On Quantum Mechanical View of Reality by Richard Feynman (1983) he mentions that is a Bessel function, without giving further detail.And also mentions that:where
mis basically a scale factor.
such that both are very similar. And that something similar holds for many other particles.And then, when you draw a Feynman diagram, e.g. electron emits photon and both are detected at given positions, you sum over all the possibilities, each amplitude is given by:summed over all possible Spacetime points.This is basically well said at: youtu.be/rZvgGekvHes?t=3349 from Quantum Mechanical View of Reality by Richard Feynman (1983).TODO: how do electron velocities affect where they are likely to end up? suggests the probability only depends on the spacetime points.Also, this clarifies why computations in QED are so insane: you have to sum over every possible point in space!!! TODO but then how do we calculate anything at all in practice? - Part 4: known problems with QED and thoughts on QCD. Boring.
Richard Feynman Quantum Electrodynamics Lecture at University of Auckland (1979) uploaded by Trev M (2015)
Source. Single upload version. Let's use this one for the timestamps I guess.- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=2217: photomultiplier tube
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=2410: local hidden-variable theory
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=6444: mirror experiment shown at en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quantum_electrodynamics&oldid=991301352#Probability_amplitudes
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=7309: mirror experiment with a diffraction grating pattern painted black leads to reflection at a weird angle
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=7627: detector under water to explain refraction
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=8050: explains biconvex spherical lens in terms of minimal times
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=8402: mentions that for events in a series, you multiply the complex number of each step
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=9270: mentions that the up to this point, ignored:but it should not be too hard to add those
- amplitude shrinks down with distance
- photon polarization
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=11697: finally starts electron interaction. First point is to add time of event detection.
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=13704: electron between plates, and mentions the word action, without giving a clear enough idea of what it is unfortunately
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=14467: mentions positrons going back in time, but does not clarify it well enough
- youtu.be/Alj6q4Y0TNE?t=16614: on the fourth part, half is about frontiers in quantum electrodynamics, and half full blown theory of everything. The QED part goes into renormalization and the large number of parameters of the Standard Model
Architecture All Access: Quantum Computing by James Clarke (2021)
Source. Video "The Biggest Ideas in the Universe | 17. Matter by Sean Carroll (2020)" at youtu.be/dQWn9NzvX4s?t=3707 says that no one has ever been able to come up with an intuitive reason for the proof.
Oxford Nanopore Technologies product by Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-06-02 +Created 1970-01-01
Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-06-02 +Created 1970-01-01 Myoglobin structure resolution (1958) by Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-06-02 +Created 1970-01-01
Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-06-02 +Created 1970-01-01Published at: a Three-Dimensional Model of the Myoglobin Molecule Obtained by X-Ray Analysis (1958). The work was done at the Cavendish Laboratory.
Key mitochondrial proteins aren't necessarily in mtDNA by Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-06-02 +Created 1970-01-01
Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-06-02 +Created 1970-01-01This isn't completely surprising, since when mitochondria die, their DNA is kind of left in the cell, so it is not hard to imagine how genes end up getting uptaken by the nucleus. This is suggested at Power, Sex, Suicide by Nick Lane (2006) page 196.
A limiting factor appears to be that you can't just past those genes in the nucleus, further mutations are necessary for mitochondrial protein import to work, apparenty some kind of tagging with extra amino acids.
However, you likely don't want to remove all genes from the mitochondria because mitochondria have DNA because they need to be controlled individually.
Microbit simulator using some Microsoft framework.
TODO the Python code from there does not seem to run on the microbit via
uflash, because it is not MicroPython.support.microbit.org/support/solutions/articles/19000111744-makecode-python-and-micropython explains.
forum.makecode.com/t/help-understanding-local-build-options/6130 asks how to compile locally and suggests it is possible. Seems to require Yotta, so presumably compiles?
CC BY-NC-SA unfortunately.
Upload is actually optional, and it appears that teachers do retain their copyright: ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/MIT_OpenCourseWare_FAQs.pdf Hmmm, so how have they convinced so many teachers to do it?
Plutonium-based.
Its plutonium was produced at Hanford site.
Trinity: Getting The Job Done
. Source. Good video, clarifies several interesting technical points:- Gun-type fission weapon were much easier to build as you don't need super synchronized charges as in implosion-type fission weapon. But they are less efficient.
- Plutonium make much more efficient usage of uranium, because you don't need to highly enrich a bunch of Uranium-235 in the first place, but rather just use way less enriched Uranium-235 to produce a bunch of Plutonium by converting Uranium-238
Unlisted articles are being shown, click here to show only listed articles.