Incoming links: Quanta Magazine
OK, can someone please just stop the philosophy and give numerical predictions of how entropy helps you predict the future?
The Unexpected Side of Entropy by Daan Frenkel
. Source. 2021.- www.quantamagazine.org/what-is-entropy-a-measure-of-just-how-little-we-really-know-20241213/ What Is Entropy? A Measure of Just How Little We Really Know. on Quanta Magazine attempts to make the point that entropy is observer dependant. TODO details on that.
Bibliography:
- on Quanta Magazine: www.quantamagazine.org/cryptographys-future-will-be-quantum-safe-heres-how-it-will-work-20221109/ "Cryptography’s Future Will Be Quantum-Safe. Here’s How It Will Work." (2024)
TODO clear example and application.
www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-memory-proves-exponentially-powerful-20241016/ from Quanta Magazine has an incomprehensible news of something that sounds cool
Basically, a "representation" means associating each group element as an invertible matrices, i.e. a matrix in (possibly some subset of) , that has the same properties as the group.
Or in other words, associating to the more abstract notion of a group more concrete objects with which we are familiar (e.g. a matrix).
This is basically what everyone does (or should do!) when starting to study Lie groups: we start looking at matrix Lie groups, which are very concrete.
Or more precisely, mapping each group element to a linear map over some vector field (which can be represented by a matrix infinite dimension), in a way that respects the group operations:
As shown at Physics from Symmetry by Jakob Schwichtenberg (2015)
- page 51, a representation is not unique, we can even use matrices of different dimensions to represent the same group
- 3.6 classifies the representations of . There is only one possibility per dimension!
- 3.7 "The Lorentz Group O(1,3)" mentions that even for a "simple" group such as the Lorentz group, not all representations can be described in terms of matrices, and that we can construct such representations with the help of Lie group theory, and that they have fundamental physical application
Bibliography:
- www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rDzaKASMTM "RT1: Representation Theory Basics" by MathDoctorBob (2011). Too much theory, give me the motivation!
- www.quantamagazine.org/the-useless-perspective-that-transformed-mathematics-20200609 The "Useless" Perspective That Transformed Mathematics by Quanta Magazine (2020). Maybe there is something in there amidst the "the reader might not know what a matrix is" stuff.