NASA/TP-2004-213247 (August 2004). Printed pp. 7–9: hot-wire probes, mean/fluctuating signal channels, calibration and data analysis; Figure 20: sensitivity to retained bandwidth. Summary and flow-quality survey compare positions and operating conditions.
Originating MIT Unified Engineering teaching notes, hosted by MIT OpenCourseWare. No personal byline is established from the four-page PDF. Page 2 defines the camber-slope Fourier coefficients; p. 3 derives section lift and the zero-lift incidence; p. 4 explains angle-independent quarter-chord moment within thin-airfoil theory. The chord-to-angle substitution integrates over the angular interval from zero to pi; numerical examples in the concept articles are original calculations, not experimental results.
Sections Fuselage and Weight describe the central body, its connection of aircraft components, accommodation of payload and resistance to applied torques. This is an originating NASA explanatory page; the cylinder-stress example in the concept article is a separate ideal calculation.
Simulation Driven Design: virtual aircraft prototypes, computational credibility and rapid-turnaround multidisciplinary design.
NACA-TN-365 (1931), printed pp.2–5, Apparatus and Tests and Discussion of Results. A 5-by-30-inch Göttingen 387 model, 20-atmosphere tunnel pressure, Reynolds number 3.4 million, and comparisons of wing alone, attached struts and separate strut drag. Download: ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930081164/downloads/19930081164.pdf
Additional verified locator: Table I, printed p. 9, lists Göttingen 387 upper/lower ordinates in separate specified and measured columns; all dimensions are in percent of chord. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930081164/downloads/19930081164.pdf
Journal of Fluid Mechanics 35(4), 721–735 (10 March 1969). Exact publisher bylines B. J. Bellhouse and L. Talbot, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University. Abstract: a rigid-walled valve model in a pulsatile water tunnel exhibited a sinus stagnation point and trapped vortex, with most closure occurring while net flow was still forward. The 2006 publisher date is online publication of the historical article, not the experimental year.
Publisher Author details additionally gives L. Talbot a permanent address at the University of California, Berkeley, while listing the Oxford Department of Engineering Science affiliation. The primary author names remain B. J. Bellhouse and L. Talbot; no full initials expansion or individual division of experimental work is inferred.
Manufacturer-hosted primary manual. Cover gives Front-end Signal Conditioners, Owner’s Guide; imprint p. ii gives document U-FE/OG-35G and issue 08/18. No individual byline is asserted. Chapter 10, printed p. 149, Using the Spirometer, describes a fine mesh flow head, pressure taps and a differential pressure transducer, with proportional flow response within stated limits. Printed pp. 151–152, Calibrating the Flow Head, describes a known-volume syringe injection and time integration of the output. Printed p. 153, Reducing Drift, explains zeroing the no-flow signal to prevent steady drift of integrated volume. PDF page indices are 156, 158–159 and 160 respectively.
Virginia Tech open textbook, 2026; author William H. Mason, editor Pradeep Raj. The publisher landing page identifies the author and design-oriented scope. Appendix A.4 treats planform analysis; the Preface documents the posthumous editing of Mason’s course notes. Official departmental identity confirmation: www.aoe.vt.edu/about-us/news/mason-memorial-distinguished-lecture/mason-configuration-aerodynamics.html .
Author-hosted Virginia Tech course notes. Appendix A, Geometry for Aerodynamicists, archive.aoe.vt.edu/mason/Mason_f/CAtxtAppA.pdf , is dated 23 October 1997: pp. A-3–A-4 give the four-digit thickness polynomial and nose radius; pp. A-27–A-29 define wing area, mean aerodynamic chord and trapezoidal-planform quantities.
Additional cited passage: Appendix A, p. A-1, equations (A-1)–(A-3), upper and lower surface construction by offsets normal to the mean camber line. The following paragraph notes that neglecting the camber-line slope simplifies the inverse extraction of thickness and mean-line geometry. [ref]
Additional exact sweep locators: Appendix A, p. A-29, equations (A-97)–(A-101), leading- and trailing-edge coordinates, linear chord distribution and conversion between sweep at different fixed chord fractions. Equation (A-100) relates tangents of sweep angles rather than the angle differences. [ref]
Originating NASA geometry definitions, especially Airfoil Geometry and Wing Geometry. Defines the straight chord between leading and trailing edges, distinguishes it from camber and the curved surfaces, and explains spanwise variation of chord in a finite wing. The numerical geometry and trapezoidal-area calculations in the concept article are independent examples.
Official Drake C++ class reference. Detailed Description specifies a torque/force pair, its application point and expressed-in frame, noting that the six stored values do not retain that metadata. Shift and ShiftInPlace document the offset direction and moment-translation cross product; forces and offsets must use the same expressed-in frame.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact