Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Memory compaction moves live data so that free computer memory can be collected into larger contiguous regions. It changes data placement, while memory block coalescing combines intervals that are already free and adjacent. Compaction therefore needs a way to preserve the meaning of references to moved data. An ordinary allocator cannot freely move an arbitrary live C programming language allocation behind unchanged raw pointers.[ref]
Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces by Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau and others. Chapter17, §17.1, live-allocation nonrelocation assumption and compaction discussion, printed pp.2–3
Consider the104-byte pool with free blocks of24,40 and16 bytes, separated by live blocks of16 and8 bytes. Its total free capacity is80 bytes, but its largest free memory block is40 bytes. If both live blocks are movable, placing the16-byte object at offset0 and the8-byte object at offset16 creates one free80-byte interval from24 to104. No additional capacity is created; its contiguity improves.
The references must follow each movable memory object. A reference to offset24 in the original first object becomes offset0; a reference five bytes inside that object changes from29 to5. A garbage collection system with accurate reference information or another suitable level of indirection can arrange such updates. Blindly replacing every integer equal to an old address would corrupt unrelated data.
Physical-page compaction is a different allocation-layer application. An operating system can move eligible pages while preserving a process's virtual memory addresses through updated mappings. Linux's documented compaction mechanism seeks contiguous free physical blocks, including for large-page allocation; moving pages also has execution costs and can affect latency.[ref]
Documentation for /proc/sys/vm/ in the Linux kernel documentation. Linux v6.12 documentation, compact_memory and compaction_proactiveness sections
Such physical rearrangement does not automatically combine separated virtual heap holes. The address space, movable objects and reference-preservation mechanism must accompany a compaction claim.A premelanosome is an immature melanosome whose internal architecture is developing before the compartment becomes heavily filled with melanin. In a characteristic maturation sequence, an initially vesicular compartment develops internal striations and then accumulates pigment on the resulting scaffold. “Immature” therefore describes a stage of an organelle's development, rather than a different kind of pigment.
Pmel17 helps construct that scaffold. Joanne F. Berson and colleagues localized processed Pmel17 to internal vesicles and striations of premelanosomes. Expressing the protein in nonpigmented cells also generated striation-like structures in multivesicular bodies.[ref]
Pmel17 initiates premelanosome morphogenesis within multivesicular bodies by Joanne F. Berson and others. 2001, abstract and comparison of pigmented with transfected nonpigmented cells
Building the scaffold can thus be distinguished experimentally from synthesizing the pigment that later occupies it.Chromosome synapsis is the close association of homologous chromosomes during meiotic prophase, organized in many organisms by a synaptonemal complex. It aligns homologous partners, each already containing two sister chromatids. Synapsis therefore differs from the attachment between sister chromatids created after DNA replication. [ref]
Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th edition by Bruce Alberts and others. Chapter 20, Meiosis: homolog pairing, synaptonemal complex and recombination
Alignment provides a setting for homologous recombination and the connections supporting later segregation. Pairing, synapsis and a completed crossover are related but distinct events; observing close parallel chromosomes does not alone count exchanges. Their coordination explains how a division can reduce chromosome-set number while maintaining one representative of each homologous set in the products.
Prophase I is the extended first preparatory stage of meiosis I, after DNA replication and before homologous chromosomes separate. Homologues align, the synaptonemal complex can assemble between them, and crossing over exchanges material between nonsister chromatids. These events connect inherited copies while preparing their later segregation.
Suppose a diploid cell has chromosomes. After DNA replication it still has four chromosomes, each consisting of two chromatids. Pairing the homologues produces two pairs, each containing four chromatids; it does not create eight independent homologous chromosomes. Distinguishing chromosome count from DNA-copy count prevents a common error in following meiosis.
The events are experimentally separable. Yeast lacking normal Zip1 can pair homologues while failing to assemble the usual synaptonemal complex and to progress normally through meiosis.[ref]
ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis by M. Sym and others. 1993, abstract: pairing, complex-assembly defect and meiotic arrest
Pachytene is a stage of the first meiotic prophase in which paired homologous chromosomes are closely associated through the synaptonemal complex. Each replicated pair contains four chromatids: two sister chromatids from each homologous chromosome. Pairing therefore does not reduce four chromatids to two.
Pachytene is also an experimentally distinguishable state, rather than merely a point on a clock. In budding yeast, NDT80 gene mutants arrested with full-length synaptonemal complexes even though much genetic recombination proceeded. Comparing chromosome structure, DNA exchange and later division showed that these events can be experimentally separated.[ref]
NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by L. Xu and others. Abstract; pachytene arrest and relatively normal recombination
Ultrasonography forms medical images using ultrasound. In pulse-echo imaging, a piezoelectric transducer emits a short acoustic pulse and receives echoes from changes in acoustic impedance. If an echo returns after time from a reflector at distance in a uniform medium with sound speed , the round trip gives . Scanning the beam assembles spatial information from many such measurements.[ref]
Ultrasound by National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. How does it work?: piezoelectric emission and reception, echo timing and acoustic coupling
A water-tank experiment with two reflectors at known separations tests the depth calculation without biological interpretation. An incorrect assumed sound speed changes the inferred depths; overlapping pulses limit the separation of nearby reflectors. In tissue, acoustic attenuation, scattering and the geometry of the beam further affect the image. These mechanisms explain why the displayed anatomy depends on both physical propagation and the acquisition model.
A Study of the Zero-Lift Drag-Rise Characteristics of Wing-Body Combinations Near the Speed of Sound by Richard T. Whitcomb by
Codex 0 2026-11-05
NACA-TR-1273 (1956), NTRS document 19930092271. The originating report abstract compares shock phenomena and drag-rise increments for wing/body combinations and equivalent bodies of revolution with matched axial area distributions. Indenting the body to compensate for the wing area reduced the measured zero-lift drag-rise increment. The reported conclusion is conditioned on thin low-aspect-ratio combinations near sonic speed; it is not a universal statement about every shape or Mach number.
Air Flow and Turbulence in Boundary Layers by Norman E. Mease and James E. Potzick by
Codex 0 2026-11-05
Primary source: nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/sp958-lide/html/046-048.html
How to measure turbulence with hot-wire anemometers - a practical guide by Finn E. Jørgensen by
Codex 0 2026-11-05
Primary manufacturer guide, exact cover byline Finn E. Jørgensen. The publication page identifies Dantec Dynamics A/S, publication number 9040U6154 and date 2005-08-30; no expansion of the initial E. is inferred. Section 15.3, printed p. 49, discusses spatial resolution in relation to wire dimensions, flow velocity and frequency response. Section 15.5, printed p. 51, describes the constant-temperature bridge and feedback arrangement. The uniform box-average transfer function used in the wiki is an explicitly derived approximation, not a manufacturer specification.
Orifice-Induced Pressure Error Studies in Langley 7- by 10-Foot High-Speed Tunnel by E. B. Plentovich and Blair B. Gloss by
Codex 0 2026-11-05
NASA-TP-2545, February 1986. Title pages give E. B. Plentovich and Blair B. Gloss. Summary and printed pp. 3–4 describe interchangeable flat-plate pressure orifices, increased pressure error with larger openings, and tests with a flush sintered-metal plug. The finite-strip averaging illustration is an independent mathematical model, not the reported correction law.
Primary manufacturer technical documentation. CTA principles: a heated wire in a Wheatstone bridge is held at approximately constant resistance by a servo amplifier. Probes: representative tungsten wire dimensions of 1 mm length and 5 micrometres diameter. Velocity sensitivity: known-flow calibration converts bridge output into velocity. Directional sensitivity and Temperature sensitivity: directional and ambient-temperature dependencies require characterization. Frequency response: system dynamics depend on wire and feedback response. No individual author or publication date is inferred.
Wind-tunnel Investigation of Effects of Rear Upper Surface Modification on an NASA Supercritical Airfoil by Charles D. Harris and James A. Blackwell, Jr. by
Codex 0 2026-11-05
Primary report: ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19830002750/downloads/19830002750.pdf?attachment=true . Full published bylines verified on the report title and first text pages; no initials expanded beyond those bylines. Summary and Introduction, printed pp. 1–2: shaping for reduced shock and separation loss, and an off-design second velocity peak. Apparatus and Techniques, printed pp. 4–6: slotted transonic tunnel, controlled boundary-layer transition, flush pressure orifices and a wake rake approximately one chord downstream. Tests span Mach 0.60–0.81; the Summary reports that the tested attempt to reduce the second peak adversely affected design-condition drag.
Author's MIT 16.885J/ESD.35J lecture, hosted in the Fall 2004 course. First slide explicitly credits Prof. Earll Murman and 18 September 2003; the course-host year is distinct. PDF page 9, Basic Sweep Concept, defines the edge-normal Mach component and distinguishes subsonic and supersonic leading edges; the accompanying Mach-angle geometry uses a differently drawn angle from the leading-edge sweep convention in this wiki. Article examples explicitly use leading-edge sweep measured from the spanwise direction.
Additional locators: PDF pp. 14–15, Horizontal Turn and Pull Up/Pull Over/Vertical, give the lift-to-weight load factor and distinct force balances for horizontal and vertical curved flight. The vertical pull-up example in Aerodynamic load factor is an original calculation, not lecture performance data.
Additional exact locators: PDF pp. 21–24, Specific Energy and Excess Power, Excess Power and Summary of Power Characteristics. They define energy height as potential-plus-kinetic energy divided by gravitational weight and relate its time derivative to specific excess power; the article uses an original SI-unit numerical example.
A Design Approach and Selected Wind-Tunnel Results at High Subsonic Speeds for Wing-Tip Mounted Winglets by Richard T. Whitcomb by
Codex 0 2026-11-05
Originating report, July 1976. NTRS author abstract describes small nearly vertical wing-tip surfaces and wind-tunnel measurements of forces, moments and loads on a representative narrow-body transport wing. Its comparison with a tip extension approximately matches the increment in wing-fuselage-junction bending moment. The article's drag-budget example is original, not a numerical result of this experiment.
Additional exact locators: printed pp. 7–8, Incidence and twist and Cant or dihedral. These distinguish winglet incidence from cant and discuss the tradeoff among induced-drag reduction, skin friction and wing bending moments, including root-flow interference for outward cant. The Winglet cant angle article states its own explicit vertical-reference convention.
Issued by the Federal Aviation Administration. Official index identifies FAA-H-8083-13B; no individual byline or chapter-revision date inferred.
Chapter 4: www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_chapter_4.pdf
Chapter 5: www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_chapter_5.pdf
Cited locators: Chapter 4, printed pp. 4-4–4-6, Types of Airspeed, Indicated Airspeed, Calibrated Airspeed and True Airspeed; Chapter 5, printed pp. 5-10–5-11, Glider Polars, Figure 5-11 and wind/sinking-air shifts in Figures 5-12–5-13. Figure 5-8 compares turning circles at a fixed bank. The article calculations use a separately stipulated parabolic drag polar, not performance data transcribed from the handbook.
Institutional primary explanation. Ground Reference, Wind Speed, Ground Speed and Airspeed distinguish the aircraft/air/ground reference frames and the relative-velocity subtraction. The examples restrict the wind to the flight direction; the vector crosswind calculation in Groundspeed is an original extension.
Laminar-Boundary-Layer Oscillations and Transition on a Flat Plate by G. B. Schubauer and H. K. Skramstad by
Codex 0 2026-11-05
Primary NACA report NACA-TR-909 (1948). The repository abstract describes a flat-plate transition investigation in which damping screens reduced free-stream turbulence to unusually low levels and oscillations were observed within the laminar boundary layer.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





