Excitation-band selectivity in nail fluorescence corrections

ID: excitation-band-selectivity-in-nail-fluorescence-corrections

Excitation-band selectivity in nail fluorescence corrections describes how well the detection system distinguishes transmitted illumination from light emitted by the nail plate. Selecting the illumination with a monochromator does not force every detected photon to remain in that spectral band: fluorescence can contribute at other wavelengths.
For an original linear detection model, write the transmitted and emitted spectral powers as and , where both spectral shapes integrate to one. If an optical filter has transmission and a detector has spectral responsivity , its current after subtraction of dark current is
The coefficients are spectrum-weighted responsivities, with units of amperes per watt. A selective filter can reduce while also reducing , so an uncorrected smaller current does not establish lower specimen transmittance.
For stipulated , , and , current is . Assigning all of it to transmitted illumination gives , a 1.67% relative overestimate. These chosen coefficients illustrate leakage; they are not measured filter characteristics for nails.
Emission-spectrum mismatch in nail fluorescence subtraction matters when the assumed differs from the specimen's emission. If analysis subtracts while the true coefficient is , then
At the same powers and , using instead of 0.020 leaves a positive bias. A precisely known total emitted power would not eliminate this spectral mismatch.
The historical nail-transmission experiment explicitly corrected for fluorescence.[ref] The integral above is an explanatory extension, not a reconstruction of its unpublished correction coefficients. An experimental test would characterize detector/filter response and compare detection bands while keeping illumination and collection geometry in nail-transmission measurements fixed. Spectral rejection and angular collection constrain different parts of the measurement.

New to topics? Read the docs here!