Failure of Minkowski inequality below exponent one
ID: failure-of-minkowski-inequality-below-exponent-one
For , write to emphasize that this is a quasi-norm, as in the Lq quasi-norm branch. On two coordinates with counting measure, and give , but . At , this is the explicit failure in the right panel of the diagram. The midpoint has , so the corresponding unit sublevel set is not a convex set.
A useful replacement survives: for nonnegative real numbers , . Together with the scalar triangle inequality, this yieldsConsequently is a metric on the equivalence classes of measurable functions with finite , even though itself need not be a metric. Do not replace the failed Minkowski inequality by a universal reversed bound for signed or complex functions: would give a zero sum but two positive separate sizes.
New to topics? Read the docs here!