Higher-harmonic penalty in span loading

ID: higher-harmonic-penalty-in-span-loading

A higher-harmonic penalty in span loading is the increase of ideal lift-induced drag caused by nonfundamental terms in a wing's circulation distribution at fixed total lift and span. In the classical planar lifting-line theory expansion, choose and
Here is span, is freestream speed, and the coefficients are dimensionless. The primary force calculation uses this circulation expansion, the local lift law and sine orthogonality to obtain the lift and induced drag.[ref]
Because and , the integral for total lift selects only . The induced angle contains . Integrating its product with the loading then gives
The orthogonality identity behind both reductions is
A higher harmonic can thus have zero net lift contribution while still adding positive induced drag. Its effect on local loading has not disappeared merely because its span integral vanishes.
For nonzero , division by the elliptic reference gives
The pure first harmonic gives elliptic span loading and . At a fixed relative coefficient magnitude, a larger order carries a larger penalty. Changing a coefficient's sign can redistribute the loading without changing its own squared contribution in this ideal model.
For an original example, take , and all other higher terms zero. The excess is , so . With and ,
At and , the corresponding induced drags are about and . The higher harmonics add to this induced contribution, rather than to every source of aircraft drag.
A truncation error in an inferred span-efficiency factor matters when fitting sparse load measurements. Omitting nonzero terms makes the ideal-model drag sum too small at a fixed known , while fitting noisy high orders can inflate it because the terms are squared and weighted by order. If a justified bound is , then . A fit residual alone does not supply that bound.
A proposed experiment reconstructs section lift or circulation from a spanwise pressure survey, fits a declared set of modes, and compares the predicted induced contribution with an independent wake-based estimate. Report sampling density, load uncertainty and truncation choice. Viscosity, compressibility, nonplanar geometry or constraints other than fixed lift and span change the physical optimization problem; the quadratic penalty belongs to the stated lifting-line model.

New to topics? Read the docs here!