Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2005/iii/paper-5/5/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 5 5 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
First use independent fair signs , the Rademacher distribution convention for Bernoulli random variables in this setting. Let with uniform probability, write and . We prove the sharp Rademacher second-moment inequality by a complete finite-cube calculation.
For a function on this cube define the coordinate-flip generator on a hypercubewhere flips just coordinate . The Walsh characters form an orthonormal basis: distinct characters have expectation-zero product, and there are of them. Flipping a coordinate in changes its sign and other flips leave it unchanged, so . Expand the real function as . Since , changing variables shows that whenever is odd. ThusThis derives the even-function spectral gap on a hypercube, rather than assuming it.
At each vertex with , choose a norming functional of norm one satisfying , supplied by the Hahn-Banach theorem. For complex take real parts in the following inequalities. At a vertex with , use the zero functional. The supporting inequality for the norm givesBut , since every coefficient is a degree-one Walsh character. Summing the preceding inequalities with factor therefore proves . As ,Rearranging and taking square roots yieldsNo completeness of is needed. The constant is sharp: with two identical nonzero scalar coefficients, the absolute sum is zero with probability and twice the coefficient magnitude with probability .
If Bernoulli instead means fair variables , write and . Add an independent fair sign and apply the proved estimate to . Conditional on either sign of , has the same distribution as , by symmetry of the sign sum. Hence for , proving the same bound in that convention.
The constant is documented in the primary sharp-constant study.
Fairness is essential. For a general Bernoulli random variable with success probability , a single nonzero scalar coefficient gives . Thus the printed term cannot be read as permitting arbitrary Bernoulli probabilities.
New to topics? Read the docs here!