Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2005/iii/paper-82/3/d/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 82 3 d Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
If two harmonic solutions have the same body force and prescribed boundary traction, their difference has no body force and is traction-free. A nonzero difference would therefore be a free eigenfunction at that frequency. For any frequency outside the countable exceptional set found above, the difference must vanish, so the forced boundary-value solution, when it exists, is unique. At an eigenfrequency, a free eigenfunction can be added to any existing solution, and a resonant forcing may fail to admit a steady harmonic response. This distinguishes uniqueness from existence.
For the full time-dependent problem, let be the difference between two fields with identical forces, tractions and initial displacement field and velocity. It obeys , zero boundary traction, and zero initial data. Its energy uniqueness for traction-driven elasticity follows by direct integration:Multiply the equation by and integrate by parts. Major symmetry turns the strain term into the derivative of elastic energy, giving . Stable elasticity makes , and gives . Thus equals its initial value zero. Even rigid zero-strain motions cannot survive these initial conditions.
The PDF correctly specifies zero initial displacement field and zero initial velocity; the TeX duplicates displacement field in the second condition. The complete causal displacement field is unique, including when its Fourier representation contains resonant modal contributions fixed by the initial data.
New to topics? Read the docs here!