Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2007/iii/paper-45/1/solution

Condition on the claim count distribution. If and , then independence of the count and the independent and identically distributed random variables gives
The empty sum is zero. The law of total expectation and law of total variance therefore prove the random sum of independent claims formulas
For the variance calculation assume the count and severity have finite second moments; the expectation identity needs the corresponding integrability. Nonnegative claims also permit the expectation identity with extended nonnegative values.
Represent each policy payment as , where is a Bernoulli random variable of parameter , independent of its severity. Equivalently, specifies the payment distribution conditional on a claim. Then
Independence of the policies makes their variances add. Put
The heterogeneous individual claims model consequently has
For the Poisson approximation, define the severity mixture distribution
Let be the individual characteristic functions. Conditioning on each Poisson count and then multiplying transforms of the independent policy payments gives
This is Poisson superposition of insurance portfolios. By the uniqueness theorem for characteristic functions,
with count and severities independent. Its compound Poisson distribution has distribution function
where is the convolution distribution of independent severities and is the distribution concentrated at zero. Characteristic functions avoid assuming that severity moment-generating functions exist. Since and , the random-sum formulas give
Use to distinguish the second, compound-binomial approximation from the Poisson one. It has with and the same severity law . Thus and . Applying the random sum of independent claims identities again gives
Hence
Both approximations match the exact expected value. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives , proving the variance comparison for compound portfolio approximations:
The excess variances are respectively and . The compound-binomial model is therefore closer in variance; equality with the exact variance occurs when all are equal. This variance comparison is not a general ordering of approximation errors or tail probabilities.
The Poisson replacement is useful when all claim probabilities are small: it replaces the individual restriction of at most one claim by an unrestricted Poisson count, and the variance error is of second order in those probabilities. The compound-binomial replacement retains a count bounded by , but pools both frequencies and severity laws and can lose policy-specific information. If all and all agree, it is exactly the original portfolio law. In a heterogeneous portfolio, agreement of means, or even variances, does not make either approximate law exact. Neither approximation is guaranteed accurate merely by having many policies.

New to topics? Read the docs here!