Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2016/iii/paper-302/2/solution

A Lie algebra representation on a vector space is a linear map preserving the Lie bracket:
The Adjoint representation acts on by . The Jacobi identity gives
If is nonabelian, some is nonzero, so this Adjoint representation is not the trivial Lie algebra representation. It is the required nontrivial representation of dimension . Nontriviality does not require its homomorphism to be injective.
For the finite-dimensional algebras here, with normalization one, the Killing form is
It is a symmetric bilinear form by cyclicity of the matrix trace. To prove its invariance, write , , . Then
This also gives , the equivalent invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra identity.
For the unheaded structural requests, a simple Lie algebra is nonabelian and has no ideals of a Lie algebra other than zero and itself. A semisimple Lie algebra has no nonzero solvable ideal of a Lie algebra; in finite dimension over or this is equivalently a direct sum of simple Lie algebras.
Suppose first that the Killing form is nondegenerate. If is an abelian ideal of a Lie algebra and , then maps into and vanishes on . Every preserves . Therefore has zero diagonal blocks relative to a basis adapted to , and
Nondegeneracy forces . If a nonzero solvable ideal of a Lie algebra existed, its last nonzero derived series of a Lie algebra term would be a nonzero abelian ideal of a Lie algebra, again impossible. Hence the solvable radical is zero, proving
This argument proves the needed implication rather than assuming the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity.
One can also see the direct-sum formulation explicitly through orthogonal ideal splitting for a nondegenerate Killing form. For an ideal of a Lie algebra , invariance makes an ideal of a Lie algebra. If , then for , , so . Thus is an abelian ideal of a Lie algebra, and must vanish. Consequently and the two summands commute. Select a minimal nonzero ideal; it is nonabelian, and any ideal inside it is an ideal of because the complementary summand commutes with it. It is therefore simple. The restricted form is the remaining summand’s own Killing form, because the two ideals commute. Repeating the splitting there terminates in a direct sum of simple ideals.
Conversely the radical of the Killing form
is an ideal of a Lie algebra by the invariance just proved. For a simple Lie algebra it is either zero or the whole algebra. The permitted hypothesis that is not identically zero excludes the second alternative. Thus
The computations in the two following parts illustrate both a nondegenerate compact example and a degenerate algebra with an abelian ideal.

New to topics? Read the docs here!