Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2017/iii/paper-331/2/b/ii/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 331 2 b ii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-06
For the equal-width Hazel model with stable density stratification ,The Miles–Howard theorem therefore excludes exponentially growing regular normal modes for . The candidate neutral modes of the equal-width Hazel model instead lie onThe parabola touches the sufficient-stability threshold at its maximum. There is no contradiction: neutrality has , whereas the proof in part (a) assumes . Moreover, the profile has a singular critical-layer derivative and logarithmically divergent horizontal kinetic energy; it is not a regular growing mode satisfying the proof's hypotheses.
For , the local gradient Richardson number condition permits instability but does not establish it. Substitution of a neutral ansatz alone also does not determine on which side of the curve unstable eigenvalues lie. It identifies the formal neutral curve; concluding a full stability boundary requires additional continuation analysis of the eigenvalues. The nondecaying endpoint and the smooth endpoint have the distinct qualifications described above.
New to topics? Read the docs here!