Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mphil-in-micro-and-nanotechnology-enterprise-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2021/paper-2/section-a-i/14/i/solution
Past exam of the MPhil in micro- and nanotechnology enterprise course of the University of Cambridge 2021 Paper 2 Section A(i) 14 i Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-20
Prepare size-characterized gold-particle ensembles, heat them on a calibrated in-situ electron diffraction stage, and follow the loss of sharp fcc diffraction features and appearance of liquid-like diffuse scattering. Measure the particle size distribution rather than treating a polydisperse ensemble as one diameter. Temperature-dependent weakening of a diffraction peak alone is insufficient: thermal vibrations, particle motion, coalescence, evaporation and beam damage can also reduce intensity. Low-dose repeats, heating/cooling runs, size checks before and after heating, a bulk-like reference and support-dependent controls help distinguish melting from those effects. Electron diffraction measurements on gold particles down to about 2 nm are a classic demonstration.[ref]
Size effect on the melting temperature of gold particles by Ph. Buffat and J-P. Borel. Physical Review A 13 (1976), pp. 2287–2298, abstract: scanning diffraction and size-distribution analysis
The physical origin is the large interface contribution to free energy at small radius. A curved solid–liquid interface raises the solid's thermodynamic equilibrium chemical potential relative to the flat-interface case, so coexistence occurs below the bulk melting temperature. Reduced coordination and surface disorder provide a microscopic interpretation, but the quantitative continuum relation is a free energy balance, not simply a claim that every surface atom has a universal lower melting point.
New to topics? Read the docs here!