 Solution

State a time convention before using complex response: take fields proportional to $e^{i(kz-\omega t)}$, with $k=k_r+i\kappa$ and $\kappa \ge 0$ for a passive wave entering the material. In a homogeneous Ohmic medium, Maxwell equations with $\mathbf{J}=\sigma \mathbf{E}$ giveThe ohmic-conductor complex wavenumber describes both phase advance and amplitude decay. Real constant conductivity is only a low-frequency approximation. In the Drude model, $m\dot{\mathbf{v}}+m\gamma \mathbf{v}=-e\mathbf{E}$ giveswith a fixed positive ionic background and no additional bound-electron contribution in this simple model. The plasma frequency marks the inertial electron-response scale. More elaborate band structure, interband transitions and nonlocal transport limit this scalar treatment.^[ref]

In the collisionless nonmagnetic limit, the dispersion relation is ${\omega }^2={\omega }_p^2+c^2{k}^2$. For $\omega >{\omega }_p$,A crest can move faster than $c$ without carrying a new signal faster than light. Below cutoff the ideal wave is evanescent, with penetration length $c/\sqrt{{\omega }_p^2-{\omega }^2}$; it does not propagate as an ordinary real-$k$ bulk wave. Evanescence in the lossless limit is not Joule dissipation. Nonzero collision rate gives a dissipative conductivity and smooths this ideal cutoff picture.

For a good conductor with approximately real $\sigma \gg \omega ϵ$, the spatial branch becomesA field amplitude falls as $e^{-z/\delta }$, while intensity falls as $e^{-2z/\delta }$. The phase velocity is $\omega \delta$ in this limit. Magnetic and electric amplitudes are not related by the vacuum ratio: $Z_s=E/H=(1-i)\sqrt{\mu \omega /(2\sigma )}$ with the chosen time convention. Its positive real part is the surface resistance. The local mean heating is $\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{Re}\sigma |E{|}^2$, consistent with electromagnetic energy flowing into the metal. skin depth is an amplitude length; interpreting it as an intensity length gives a factor-of-two error.

A transmission-line mode propagates chiefly through the dielectric between conductors, even though finite metal conductivity causes loss at its boundaries. With per-length parameters $R^{\prime },L^{\prime },G^{\prime },C^{\prime }$, the telegrapher's equations give, for the same $e^{-i\omega t}$ convention,Writing a forward wave as $e^{-\Gamma z}$, $\Gamma =\alpha -i\beta$, gives ${\Gamma }^2=(R^{\prime }-i\omega L^{\prime })(G^{\prime }-i\omega C^{\prime })$. In the low-loss regime $R^{\prime }\ll \omega L^{\prime }$ and $G^{\prime }\ll \omega C^{\prime }$, set $Z_0\simeq \sqrt{L^{\prime }/C^{\prime }}$ to obtainThis low-loss transmission-line attenuation separates series conductor loss from dielectric leakage loss. Average forward power falls as $e^{-2\alpha z}$. In the normal skin-effect regime, reduced conducting area makes the AC conductor resistance increase roughly as $\sqrt{\omega }$; dielectric loss can supply a separate frequency dependence. Reflection from a mismatched termination changes delivered power without being, by itself, dissipation in the line.^[ref]

To test loss, compare several lengths of otherwise identical line with matched terminations, calibrate connectors and incident/reflected power, and monitor temperature. Separate amplitude attenuation from phase delay and from standing-wave minima. Bulk penetration, line attenuation and dielectric propagation speed are related electromagnetic quantities but describe different experimental geometries.