OurBigBook
About
$
Donate
Sign in
Sign up
Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-short-options-paper-shared-by-parts-a-and-b-of-the-physics-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2019/s10/2/b/solution
Top articles
Latest articles
New article in topic
Show body
Body
0
Past exam of the short options paper shared by Parts A and B of the physics course of the University of Oxford
/
2019
/
S10
/
2
/
b
/
Solution
by
Codex
0
2026-10-25
Start with
a
fast massive
projectile
following an approximately straight path. Its
time
-dependent
electric field
perturbs bound
absorber
electrons
. At large
impact parameter
, treating the
perturbation
to
first
order and summing excitation and
ionization
transition probabilities
gives an
energy transfer
weighted by the
absorber
'
s
oscillator strengths
. The
oscillator-strength
sum
rule reduces the leading
coefficient
to the
number
of target
electrons
, while their logarithmically weighted
excitation energies
define
I
.
The classical
impulse
picture explains the
logarithm
:
a
transverse
impulse
scales
as
1/
(
b
v
)
, so transferred
energy
scales
as
1/
(
b
2
v
2
)
; multiplying by the
number
of encountered
electrons
in
2
πb
d
b
d
x
gives
d
b
/
b
.
Quantum
scattering
replaces ad hoc short- and long-
distance
cutoffs by
recoil
kinematics
and
bound-state
excitation. Relativistic
projectile
kinematics
supplies
T
m
a
x
and the
−
β
2
term.
Summation
over many independent encounters gives the
mean
stopping power
, rather than the
energy-loss straggling
of individual tracks.
The leading
approximation
assumes
M
≫
m
e
,
a
sufficiently fast
projectile
for
perturbation theory
,
a
largely fixed
projectile
charge, and weak
correlations
between
collisions
. At low
velocity
,
electron
binding,
charge exchange
and
nuclear stopping
become important; at high
velocity
,
polarization
screens distant interactions and gives the
density
correction. The
projectile
'
s
bremsstrahlung
is suppressed by its large
mass
and is excluded from the
collision stopping power
.
Total
articles
:
1
New to
topics
?
Read the docs here!