Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-symmetry-and-relativity-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2019/2/c/i/solution
Past exam of the symmetry and relativity course of the University of Oxford 2019 2 c i Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
A useful plot must keep three different times separate: source emission , atomic absorption or re-emission , and return reception . For the cloud centroid,Let . Resonant excitation requires . Since decreases from to , its zero-width resonance first becomes possible atAt equality the line centre is reached only at infinite approach distance, where illumination vanishes. A finite source start time further limits how closely that ideal threshold is approached. For the line-centre event satisfiesThere is a second useful critical speed,for which excitation is centred on closest approach, . For it occurs on approach; for it occurs after closest approach. Even a receding ultra-relativistic atom can see the incident light blueshifted because is large.
A photon emitted toward the origin near the atomic rest-frame frequency has return Doppler factorThe sign differs from that in because the returning ray travels in the opposite direction. The returning line centre decreases from on early approach to on late recession, and is at closest-approach emission. The origin receives that closest-approach radiation at , not at zero. Prompt re-emission at exact resonance would giveIt is above below , equal at , and below above it. A finite fluorescence lifetime shifts emission later along the orbit and therefore usually toward a lower return frequency.
The following plots adopt a compact, optically thin cloud, weak excitation, isotropic incoherent spontaneous emission in the atomic rest frame, and negligible velocity dispersion. They show an intensity envelope as the observable amplitude; its rms electric-field amplitude is proportional to the square root of this intensity. An incoherent fluorescence signal has no fixed optical phase. The four rows include a nonrelativistic speed, both critical speeds, and an ultra-relativistic speed. All rows share one intensity normalization, so off-resonant signals remain visibly weak.
Illustrative returning fluorescence for slow motion, both resonance thresholds, and ultra-relativistic motion
. Left panels show the returned atomic line centre and its finite-width band; a dashed line marks the source frequency. Right panels show received intensity on a common logarithmic scale, with a thin curve for the zero-lifetime comparison. The model uses f0/f equal to 0.8, proper lifetime c tau/L equal to 0.4, fractional natural full width 0.02, and a finite source turn-on. Solid curves include the population decay, retarded reception and beaming. Details.A model for fluorescence from a uniformly moving cloud generating the plotted envelopes iswhere is a Lorentz line shape of full width . The factor is the incident photon-flux correction per source-frame time. The population is an exponential memory of earlier absorption events, not an instantaneous resonance indicator. For a detector of fixed small area at the origin, its received bolometric intensity scales asTwo powers of come from aberration of light, one from photon energy, and one from arrival-rate compression. Finite lifetime is dilated to in the source frame; over an interval with slowly changing geometry its observed decay time is . Thus approach can compress and amplify a pulse, while recession stretches and redshifts it. Illumination and collection each supply an inverse-square geometric factor in the prompt weak-excitation limit. Strong forward beaming can even make a detuned approaching precursor brighter than the later line-centre feature, as in the ultra-relativistic row; the intensity maximum need not occur at exact resonance.
Absolute amplitude and a unique detailed spectral line profile cannot be inferred from alone: cloud size, atom number, source power, optical depth, angular emission pattern and saturation were not specified. Finite cloud size convolves these point-centroid curves with additional delays. The plots describe incoherent, frequency-redistributed emission near ; a coherent Rayleigh scattering component would instead retain the driving frequency in the atom frame and add a different spectral component. These qualifications do not change the kinematic resonance thresholds or return-time relations.
New to topics? Read the docs here!
