Radiant flux through an oriented surface

ID: radiant-flux-through-an-oriented-surface

In geometrical optics, suppose radiation has a nonnegative radiance whose directional contributions add as power. Here is the actual propagation unit vector, is a solid angle element, and the collecting oriented surface has chosen unit normal . Assume the following integrals exist. The outward and inward radiant fluxes are
Both quantities are nonnegative; their difference is the signed net radiant flux. The dot product supplies the cosine of the angle with the unit normal, hence the projected area. For incoming radiation the outward unit normal gives a negative dot product; the minus sign makes the collected power positive. Measuring the incoming angle from a source-facing unit normal instead gives the familiar positive . The units check is .
Equivalently, the incoming surface integral is with local irradiance ; the emitted part of is with radiant exitance . For a small flat patch and a narrow accepted cone, nearly constant radiance and angle give . This approximation requires uniformity across the patch and cone. Direction-independent outgoing radiance over a whole hemisphere gives the different exact result , by Lambert's cosine law and the spherical coordinates calculation in radiant exitance. Replacing the cosine-weighted integral by the hemisphere's solid angle would double the answer.[ref]
These radiance formulas presume a description in additive directional power; they do not reconstruct arbitrary coherent wave interference from separate ray contributions. For general electromagnetic fields, the signed instantaneous power crossing an oriented surface is , using the Poynting vector ; optical measurements commonly average over many wave periods. A zero net radiant flux can conceal equal nonzero incoming and outgoing radiant fluxes.

New to topics? Read the docs here!