Consider this is a study in failed computational number theory.

The

n / l n (n)

approximation converges really slowly, and we can't easy go far enough to see that the ration converges to 1 with only awk and primes:

sudo apt intsall bsdgames
cd prime-number-theorem
./main.py 100000000

Runs in 30 minutes tested on Ubuntu 22.10 and P51, producing:

Figure 1.
Linear $π (n)$ vs $n / l n (n)$ approximation plot
. $f (n) = n$ and $f (n) = l o g (n)$ are added to give a better sense of scale. $l o g (n)$ is too close to 0 and not visible, and the approximation almost overlaps entirely with $p i$ .

Figure 2.
$π (n) - n / l n (n)$
. It is clear that the difference diverges, albeit very slowly.

Figure 3.
$π (n) / (n / l n (n))$
. We just don't have enough points to clearly see that it is converging to 1.0, the convergence truly is very slow. The logarithm integral approximation is much much better, but we can't calculate it in awk, sadface.

But looking at: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Prime_number_theorem_ratio_convergence.svg we see that it takes way longer to get closer to 1, even at

1 0^{2} 4

it is still not super close. Inspecting the code there we see:

(* Supplement with larger known PrimePi values that are too large for \
Mathematica to compute *)
LargePiPrime = {{10^13, 346065536839}, {10^14, 3204941750802}, {10^15,
     29844570422669}, {10^16, 279238341033925}, {10^17,
    2623557157654233}, {10^18, 24739954287740860}, {10^19,
    234057667276344607}, {10^20, 2220819602560918840}, {10^21,
    21127269486018731928}, {10^22, 201467286689315906290}, {10^23,
    1925320391606803968923}, {10^24, 18435599767349200867866}};

so OK, it is not something doable on a personal computer just like that.