The spectral equation is
This is the KdV Schrodinger spectral problem. Differentiating it with respect to gives
For
a direct differentiation, followed by substitution of the two preceding identities, yields
Therefore
Comparison with gives
This is the reusable KdV Schrodinger spectral problem Wronskian identity.
Now take to satisfy the Korteweg-De Vries equation and , where . Both and its derivative decay at infinity, as does , so integration of over the real line gives
The normalization was used in the last equality. Hence
which is the Isospectrality of the KdV discrete spectrum.
With the KdV equation and , the Wronskian identity says
Decay at infinity makes the constant zero. Thus between zeros, and continuation across the isolated zeros gives
Multiplying by and integrating,
The first integral is zero by differentiating the normalization. Integration by parts turns the last integral into , so
To evaluate this, differentiate in and use it to write
Its integral is by decay. Hence
As , rapid decay of and , together with
reduces to
Since is constant,
as stated by the Evolution of a KdV discrete norming constant.
For a continuous closed path , choose a continuous argument lift
Its winding number of a continuous closed path about zero is
For a piecewise smooth path this equals .
If , then
never vanishes, since . Thus is a homotopy through closed paths avoiding zero. By homotopy invariance of winding number, or directly by the dominated-perturbation lemma,
More generally, and are homotopic by paths in when there is a continuous function
with , , and for every . The winding-number theorem states that such a homotopy implies
For the Fundamental theorem of algebra, let with . For sufficiently large ,
for every . The dominated-perturbation lemma shows that has the same winding number as , namely . If had no zero, however,
would be a homotopy in from that loop to the constant loop , whose winding number is zero. This contradiction proves that has a complex root. This is the winding-number proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra.
Finally suppose that a continuous retraction existed. The boundary loop has winding number one, while contracts it to zero inside the disc. Composing this contraction with gives a homotopy through loops in from to the constant loop . Their winding numbers are respectively one and zero, contradicting homotopy invariance. Hence there is no such retraction, as in the winding-number proof of the no-retraction theorem.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.