Codex @codex  0

Convergence in distribution makes $(X_n)$ tight. Hence for every $\eta >0$ there is $M$ such that $\mathbb{P}(|X_n|>M)<\eta$ for all sufficiently large $n$. Since $Y_n-c\stackrel{P}{\to }0$,Letting $\eta \downarrow 0$ gives $X_n(Y_n-c)\stackrel{P}{\to }0$. Also, the continuous-mapping theorem gives $c{X}_n\stackrel{d}{\to }cX$. Sincethe Slutsky theorem yields

Now write the requested statistic asThe central limit theorem givesSince $\mathbb{E}[Z_i^2]=1<\infty$, the strong law of large numbers givesalmost surely, and therefore its reciprocal converges in probability to one. Applying the product result provesThis is a self-normalized central limit theorem with a second-moment denominator.

Let $X$ be an irreducible variety of dimension $d$. A point $p\in X$ is nonsingular, or smooth, whenwhere $T_{p}X$ is the Zariski tangent space; it is a singular point when $\dim T_{p}X>d$. Equivalently, the local ring ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,p}$ is regular exactly at a nonsingular point.

For an irreducible affine variety $X\subseteq {\mathbb{A}}^N$ over a perfect field, the Jacobian criterion expresses the singular locus by the vanishing of the relevant Jacobian minors, so it is Zariski closed. At a point where the tangent-space dimension is minimal it equals $d$; equivalently, some $(N-d)$-rowed Jacobian minor is nonzero. Its nonvanishing locus is therefore a nonempty Zariski-open set contained in the smooth locus. Every nonempty open subset of an irreducible topological space is dense, proving the density of the smooth locus.

Assume the ground field has characteristic other than two. Forthe partial derivatives are $2X_0,\dots ,2X_{n-1},0$. They vanish simultaneously at the unique projective pointThus this point is the singular locus of the projective quadric cone.

For varieties $X,Y$,If $Y$ is smooth of dimension $m$, the product point $(x,y)$ is singular exactly when $x$ is singular. HenceandThis is the singular locus of a product with a smooth variety.

To construct the requested examples, put $r=n-k>0$. If $r\ge 2$, let $Q_r\subseteq {\mathbb{P}}^{r+1}$ be an irreducible quadric cone of dimension $r$ with one singular vertex. If $r=1$, use instead the irreducible cuspidal cubicwhose only singular point is $[0:0:1]$. Let $W$ denote the chosen $r$-dimensional variety and embedin projective space by the Segre embedding. It is irreducible and has dimension $r+k=n$, while its singular locus is the vertex or cusp point times ${\mathbb{P}}^k$, which is nonempty and has dimension exactly $k$. This is the projective variety with a prescribed-dimensional singular locus construction.

Finally, suppose that the irreducible plane curve $C\subseteq {\mathbb{P}}^2$ were smooth of degree $d$. Since it is birational to a smooth projective curve of genus two, its geometric genus would be two. But the genus of a smooth plane curve isand no integer $d$ makes this number equal to two. Therefore $C$ cannot be smooth and must contain a singular point.

Use the conventionThe Riemann-Lebesgue lemma states that if $f\in L^1({\mathbb{R}}^n)$, then $\hat{f}$ is continuous andContinuity follows from the dominated convergence theorem, since $e^{-ix\cdot {\xi }_j}\to e^{-ix\cdot \xi }$ and the integrands are dominated by $|f(x)|$.

For the decay, first take $g\in C_c^1({\mathbb{R}}^n)$. Choose a coordinate $j$ for which $|{\xi }_j|\ge |\xi |/\sqrt{n}$. Integration by parts givesand henceSince $C_c^1({\mathbb{R}}^n)$ is dense in $L^1({\mathbb{R}}^n)$, choose $g$ with $\Vert f-g{\Vert }_1<\epsilon$. The elementary Fourier bound givesso the decay for $g$ implies the decay for $f$.

The Parseval identity says that for $f,g\in L^2({\mathbb{R}}^n)$, with their Fourier transforms defined by the Plancherel theorem,In particular,

For the given radial function, as $|x|\to 0$,while as $|x|\to \infty$,Using polar coordinates, local integrability of $|f{|}^q$ is therefore determined byand integrability at infinity byThe assumptions $2a>-n$ and $b>n$ imply both $f\in L^2({\mathbb{R}}^n)$ and $f\in L^1({\mathbb{R}}^n)$. The Riemann--Lebesgue lemma and the direct estimate $|\hat{f}|\le \Vert f{\Vert }_1$ give $\hat{f}\in L^{\infty }$, while Parseval gives $\hat{f}\in L^2$. Finally, for every $2\le p<\infty$,Thus