The aerodynamic load factor compares lift with gravitational weight. The stated convention takes along the chosen positive lift direction, so is a signed force ratio, not simply the magnitude of total acceleration divided by . A steady level condition can have with zero inertial acceleration.[ref]
A focused example is a wings-level pull-up at the bottom of a vertical curved path. Neglect other vertical forces and take upward normal acceleration as positive. The force balance gives
For stipulated true airspeed , curvature radius and , the upward centripetal acceleration is and . With , lift is , while the net upward force is . Neither is the other.
In the steady horizontal-turn model, the condition instead is ; bank angle derives that balance. It does not apply unchanged to the vertical pull-up. At fixed air mass density, wing area and usable maximum lift coefficient, the relation gives limiting speed proportional to for positive . For this example, the factor is about relative to the corresponding one-load condition.
A force balance measures aerodynamic load; a trajectory measurement estimates inertial acceleration. Comparing them requires the gravitational weight term and correct directions. A reported load factor also needs its force-axis convention: thrust, side forces and coupled motion can matter to what an instrument actually records. The definition alone establishes neither structural capability nor available lift before aerodynamic stall.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.