If , then has a scaled half-normal distribution with
Put . The population median is , and the asymptotic distribution of a sample median gives
Under , positivity of the scale means . If is the -quantile of the standard normal distribution, an asymptotically level- test rejects for
Larger scale makes the population median larger, so this is the appropriate one-sided rejection region.
Let be the unique median. The influence function of the sample median is
away from . Its second moment, equivalently the asymptotic distribution of a sample median, gives
No symmetry assumption is used: the density is evaluated at the actual median of .
Now both the number of groups and their size equal . A group mean is approximately , whose density at is approximately . The asymptotic distribution of a sample median based on such values therefore has variance
This suggests the conjecture
provided a sufficiently uniform central and local limit approximation controls the triangular array.
First establish the limiting law needed by the delta method. For fixed , put and let count how many of the are at most . Then has a binomial distribution with expectation and variance . The event is exactly . Its standardized threshold tends to , so the central limit theorem for these binomial counts gives
Here is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution. Equivalently,
Use the usual local regularity for the delta method: is continuous at the population median and . The inverse function theorem, applied at , gives
Therefore
The asymptotic normality gives the requested leading variance approximation
Here the variance parameter for the rescaled limiting law is , while the source states the corresponding approximation for the unscaled estimator. Strict increase of alone does not force ; that local condition is needed for this form of the asymptotic distribution of a sample median.