Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 10 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Here “subspace” is understood to mean a closed closed linear subspace. Closedness matters: the finitely supported sequences are an infinite-dimensional algebraic subspace of , but contain no infinite-dimensional complete subspace. Indeed, any such subspace would be the countable union of its intersections with the finite-dimensional coordinate spaces, contrary to the Baire category theorem. We prove the assertion with the intended closedness convention, for .
Write , the l-p sequence space. Choose positive numbers with . Starting with , choose with and its first coordinates zero. This is possible because the kernel of finitely many coordinate linear functionals on an infinite-dimensional vector space is still infinite-dimensional. Choose so that the part of after coordinate has norm below . Let be its restriction to , and put . The triangle inequality givesThe vectors form a normalized block basic sequence. Their supports are disjoint, soConsequently is isometric to the l-p sequence space.
For each block choose a norm-one linear functional supported on with . The Hahn-Banach theorem supplies such a functional, including when . DefineThe series converges in the l-p sequence space, sinceAlso , so is a bounded projection onto . Now define the bounded linear operatorThis series converges in operator norm and . The Neumann series therefore makes invertible. Disjoint support gives . Thus lies in the closed subspace , is isomorphic to the l-p sequence space, and is the range of the bounded projection on the whole space . This proves the required copy of is complemented in the ambient , not just in .
Now let be an infinite-dimensional complemented subspace of . The construction supplies with and a bounded projection . Its restriction to gives the topological direct sumIf is a bounded projection, then is a bounded projection onto : its range lies in , and it fixes every element of . Hence is a complemented subspace of , so for some closed .
We give the absorption argument in the Pełczyński decomposition method explicitly. Reindexing coordinates by a bijection between and yields . Applying the fixed Banach space isomorphism in every coordinate givesThe extra is absorbed by shifting the countably many summands. The maps are bounded with bounded inverses because the same two-space decomposition is used uniformly in each summand; we may equip each finite direct sum with its equivalent -sum norm. Since , .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 10 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The real Grothendieck inequality asserts that a universal constant satisfiesfor every finite real scalar matrix and vectors of norm at most one in a real Hilbert space. For complex scalars the corresponding scalar supremum is over phases of modulus at most one; a universal complex constant also exists. We prove both versions, without needing the optimal constant.
First, for unit vectors and a standard Gaussian vector on their finite-dimensional span,To see this, rotational symmetry makes the angle of the Gaussian vector uniform in the plane spanned by . The two signs differ with probability . Subtracting twice this probability from one gives the identity; collinear cases follow directly. Zero Gaussian coordinates have probability zero.
Put , so and . In the Hilbert direct sum of odd tensor powers, formed with the Hilbert tensor product inner product, defineThe Hilbert tensor product satisfies . For unit , both transformed vectors have squared norm , and the power series for sine givesFor any finite collection of these transformed vectors, use a standard Gaussian vector on their finite-dimensional span. The sign identity and giveConsequently, writing for the scalar sign supremum,Vectors of norm below one are padded to unit vectors in additional orthogonal directions, using separate directions for the two families so their cross inner products remain unchanged. This proves the real Grothendieck inequality with .
For the complex Grothendieck inequality, rotate the total scalar sum to have nonnegative real part. Its real part is the sum of the two real bilinear expressions involving and . The real inner products are realized in the underlying real Hilbert space, rotating one family by for the imaginary part. Each real coefficient matrix has real sign supremum at most the phase supremum of the original complex matrix. Applying the real inequality twice gives the valid constant . In what follows let denote the appropriate real or complex constant.
Now let be a bounded linear operator into a Hilbert space, and write . If there is nothing to prove. Approximate a finite family of functions by simple functions on a common disjoint measurable partition. For such a family, write and . The vectorshave norm at most . Choose unit vectors with ; zero images contribute zero and can be assigned any unit vector. With inner products linear in their first argument, the Grothendieck inequality givesOver the real field, phases here are signs. For any Banach space , operator norm duality givesIndeed, interchange the two suprema and choose each phase to align the scalar values of the functional. Thus the required summing inequality holds for simple functions. Approximation in the Lp space passes it to arbitrary finite families, since both sides vary continuously under finite sums of errors. We obtainFinally let be the closed span of the Rademacher functions in . Independence, the scalar second moment, and Q2 give, for each finite scalar family,Completion therefore defines a Banach space isomorphism with and . If a bounded projection existed, would be an absolutely summing operator by the result just proved. The ideal property , obtained directly from the defining weak 1-norm, would make absolutely summing. But its first coordinate vectors satisfyA single finite summing constant cannot dominate for all . Hence the closed Rademacher span is not complemented in .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 10 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a cotype 2 constant of . All bounded linear operators from have finite p-summing norms: writing and using the triangle inequality in the finite-family norm gives . Thus applying the Pietsch factorization theorem below is legitimate.
First let , and use the Pietsch factorization theorem to choose a probability measure on the dual unit ball . For a finite family , the cotype 2 inequality and Pietsch factorization theorem domination giveThe Jensen inequality bounds the final bracket by . For real or complex scalars,For complex scalars, paired-index expansion gives , which is at most the displayed bound by the triangle inequality. For real scalars this reduces to . Since is a probability measure on the dual unit ball, we obtainTaking the least constant proves with , uniformly in .
We next prove a summing-norm interpolation estimate using coordinate truncation. Put and , assuming . The Pietsch factorization theorem for gives a measure on . The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality givesSet . Their sum is at most one; adding the missing mass to one coordinate, if necessary, makes a probability vector and preserves domination. HenceWrite . For , clip each coordinate of at magnitude , obtaining , with if . Set . Then andThe triangle inequality and the two different bounds on now give . For , take ; if , domination already gives . ConsequentlySumming fourth powers over any family givessince each coordinate evaluation belongs to the dual unit ball. Therefore . Combine this with the first estimate:The zero operator also satisfies this inequality. Both constants depend only on , through its cotype 2 constant, and not on .
Finally let have dimension , with its inherited norm. The permitted finite-dimensional identity result is . The inclusion is an isometric embedding, so . For every Banach space isomorphism , apply the preceding estimate to and the ideal property of absolutely p-summing operators:The Banach-Mazur distance is the infimum of this last product over , and therefore
Pełczyński decomposition method 2026-10-14
For a Banach space satisfying , a complemented subspace is absorbed by : write , expand the countable sum, and absorb one additional copy of into the countably many summands. Hence . If is complemented in and contains a complemented copy of , write with complemented in ; the preceding argument gives . The decompositions are Banach space isomorphisms, not merely algebraic decompositions.