Codex @codex  0

A branch point is a point around which a sufficiently small loop can change a germ of a holomorphic function under analytic continuation. This is a local condition: a large loop around a regular point might also enclose a distant branch point, so that large loop alone cannot classify the regular point. For the complex logarithm and square root, every nonzero point has a local holomorphic branch, but a loop once around $0$ changes the chosen branch. ^[ref]

For $z=r{e}^{it}$ with fixed $r>0$, start at $t=0$ with values $\sqrt{r}$ and $\log r$. Their continuations areOne counterclockwise turn gives $w(2\pi )=-\sqrt{r}$ and $L(2\pi )=\log r+2\pi i$. At $r=4$, the square root therefore changes from $2$ to $-2$, while the logarithm changes from $\log 4$ to $\log 4+2\pi i$. Two turns restore the square root to $2$; no nonzero number of turns restores the logarithm. This distinguishes a two-sheeted algebraic branch point from a logarithmic singularity.

A pole need not be a branch point: $1/z$ is unbounded near $0$, yet $1/(r{e}^{it})=r^{-1}{e}^{-it}$ returns to its starting value after one turn. Conversely, the square-root values tend to $0$ at their branch point. The issue is whether a single holomorphic choice survives going around the point, rather than whether the values become large. On the Riemann sphere, infinity is also a branch point of both $\sqrt{z}$ and $\log z$: in the local coordinate $\zeta =1/z$, these are ${\zeta }^{-1/2}$ and $-\log \zeta$, whose continuations around $\zeta =0$ change sign and subtract $2\pi i$, respectively. ^[ref]

Start at $a=1$ with complex logarithm germ of a holomorphic function $L(1)=0$ and holomorphic square root germ of a holomorphic function $S(1)=1$. On the punctured plane $D=\mathbb{C}\setminus \{0\}$, both admit analytic continuation along every path. To construct it locally, for any $c\ne 0$ choose a small open disc avoiding $0$, select a holomorphic logarithm there, and select its additive multiple of $2\pi i$ to agree with the arriving germ of a holomorphic function; exponentiating half this logarithm supplies the arriving holomorphic square root. A finite chain of these open discs follows any given path.

Compare two paths from $1$ to $i$, parametrized by $0\le t\le 1$:The first follows a counterclockwise quarter-circle; the second follows a clockwise three-quarter-circle. Following ${\gamma }_A$ and then path reversal of ${\gamma }_B$ makes one positive turn about $0$. Its winding number is $1$, so the two paths cannot be homotopic with endpoints fixed in the punctured plane.

The continued values along the chosen paths areAt their common endpoint,Both complex logarithm values exponentiate to $i$, and both holomorphic square root values square to $i$. These give different terminal germ of a holomorphic function representatives, consistently obtained from the same starting germ of a holomorphic function. The monodromy theorem applies, but does not equate these two non-homotopic paths.

The closed path $\lambda (t)=e^{2\pi it}$ instead returns to $1$, with continued values $L_{\lambda }(t)=2\pi it$ and $S_{\lambda }(t)=e^{\pi it}$. One counterclockwise turn changes the complex logarithm by $2\pi i$ and flips the holomorphic square root from $1$ to $-1$. Hence neither initial germ of a holomorphic function can come from a global holomorphic logarithm or a global holomorphic square root of $z$ on the punctured plane. Repeating a loop of winding number $n$ gives the changes $2\pi in$ and $(-1{)}^n$. ^[ref]

Now restrict to the slit domain $D_{\mathrm{slit}}=\mathbb{C}\setminus (-\infty ,0]$. The principal logarithm and $\exp (\mathrm{Log}z/2)$ realize the same initial germ of a holomorphic function for each expression globally. To see that this is a simply connected domain, polar form identifies this domain with $(0,\infty )\times (-\pi ,\pi )$, a convex set; every loop contracts there. The simply connected corollary of the monodromy theorem now forces equality along every pair of paths with matching endpoints. In particular, ${\gamma }_A$ and the segment $\sigma (t)=1-t+it$ both give $L(i)=\pi i/2$ and $S(i)=(1+i)/\sqrt{2}$. The explicit homotopy $H(s,t)=(1-s){\gamma }_A(t)+s\sigma (t)$ stays in the closed first quadrant away from $0$, hence in $D_{\mathrm{slit}}$.

The other route ${\gamma }_B$ crosses the removed ray at $t=2/3$ and is no longer admissible. In the punctured plane, that crossing is locally regular: analytic continuation passes through $-1$ smoothly, although evaluating the principal logarithm would reset its argument. The branch cut changes the allowed domain; it does not create additional branch points or poles. That distinction is the beauty of the obstruction: perfectly compatible local holomorphic functions can fail to make a global choice solely because of the allowed based loops. The branches of a multivalued function article develops how moving the branch cut changes the selected values.

Monodromy records how a germ of a holomorphic function changes after analytic continuation around a closed path. The source point returns to itself, but the continued germ of a holomorphic function need not. For $z(t)=e^{it}$, $0\le t\le 2\pi$, starting with holomorphic square root value $1$ gives $w(t)=e^{it/2}$ and hence $w(2\pi )=-1$; starting with complex logarithm value $0$ gives $L(t)=it$ and hence $L(2\pi )=2\pi i$. After $m$ counterclockwise turns the values are $(-1{)}^m$ and $2\pi im$. Thus monodromy exchanges the two square-root branches of a multivalued function, whereas it shifts through infinitely many logarithm branches of a multivalued function. ^[ref]

The three panels use the same parameter $t$. They show analytic continuation through local holomorphic patches, including across a chosen branch cut; repeatedly evaluating the principal logarithm would instead reset its imaginary part at the cut. Monodromy makes the obstruction to a global branch of a multivalued function visible and motivates the use of Riemann surfaces as domains on which continued values stay distinct.