Friction of rocks by James Byerlee 2026-10-25
Pure and Applied Geophysics 116, 615–626. Experimental rock friction synthesis underpinning Byerlee's law.
James Byerlee 2026-10-25
Researcher associated with experimental rock friction and Byerlee's law.
Past exam of the plate tectonics course of the University of Oxford 2023 Question 3 a Solution 2026-10-25
Use a rock strength envelope: at each depth plot the smaller differential stress needed for frictional failure and for sustained ductile material creep at a specified strain rate. Shallow rock generally strengthens with depth because effective confining pressure increases; sufficiently deep hot rock weakens because thermally activated material creep becomes efficient.
Illustrative rock-strength envelopes for a continental interior and an old central-Pacific plate; these are conceptual profiles, not measurements
. Details. At shallow depth, Byerlee's law or a Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion gives a relation of the formwhere is cohesion, a coefficient of friction, the compressive normal stress and the pore pressure. Increasing overburden generally increases effective stress, hence the frictional strength. Conversion from fault shear stress to differential stress depends on the stress regime and fault orientation; a sketch should not label a universal numerical slope. High pore pressure or weak fault gouge can lower the frictional strength substantially.
A simplified dislocation creep relation isHere is activation energy, activation volume, the molar gas constant and absolute temperature; and depend on composition and deformation mechanism. At fixed strain rate, increasing temperature usually decreases the required stress strongly. The competing effects of pressure, water weakening of rocks, grain size and composition also matter. The intersection with frictional failure gives a brittle-ductile transition, not a change from solid to liquid.
For the Indian continental interior, a useful first sketch has an upper-crustal strength peak, a weaker lower continental crust, and renewed strength in lithospheric mantle beneath the Moho. Quartz-bearing rocks can undergo ductile material creep at conditions where colder, drier olivine-rich mantle retains appreciable strength. This creates a possible two-peak, or “jelly sandwich”, rock strength envelope. With further depth the mantle also weakens. A cold craton can retain strong lithospheric mantle to much greater depths than a tectonically heated continental region.
For the central Pacific, show thin mafic oceanic crust above a relatively thick layer of strong lithospheric mantle. There need not be a conspicuous weak lower-crustal layer. Much of the integrated strength can reside below the Moho, with a broad strength peak followed by ductile weakening towards the asthenosphere. Cooling and age control the thickness: young hot oceanic lithosphere would give a much shallower and weaker profile than an old central-Pacific plate.
The plotted Moho depths of about 38 km and 7 km, and all plotted stresses, are illustrative assumptions. “India” alone does not specify a unique geothermal gradient, water content or strain rate, and the Pacific includes plates of different ages. The robust comparison is the possible crust–mantle layering in a continent versus the thin oceanic crust and mantle-dominated strength of an old oceanic plate. The Moho is a compositional boundary; neither it nor the deepest small plotted strength is automatically the seismic lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary.
Left: ordinary frictional strengthening with depth followed by thermally activated material creep. Right: a very weak shallow faulted layer above a narrow strong region near 10 km, followed by essentially the same weakening material creep branch. These are the shapes actually plotted in Figure 2. The right curve is not a strong upper crust over a uniformly weak lower crust; neither diagram displays a second mantle-strength peak.
For the left curve, increasing overburden increases the effective normal load on faults. A schematic Coulomb friction law iswhere is cohesion, the coefficient of friction, the compressive normal stress and the pore pressure. With ordinary rock friction and approximately hydrostatic pressure, increases roughly linearly with depth. The stress needed for frictional sliding therefore increases, as in the straight shallow branch. Byerlee's law summarizes the relatively high friction found in many laboratory rocks.[ref]
At higher temperature, dislocation creep or another ductile mechanism accommodates the imposed deformation at lower stress. For example,Here is strain rate, an activation energy, the molar gas constant and absolute temperature. At fixed strain rate, increasing lowers the required stress. The operative envelope is approximately , expressed in a consistent stress convention; the peak marks the brittle-ductile transition. This accounts for the left curve's peak near 100 MPa and its decline toward small strength by about 20 km.
For the right curve, normal high-friction sliding with depth-independent fluid-pressure ratio cannot explain the nearly vertical weak shallow branch. Plausible weakening includes high pore pressure tracking the overburden, low-friction fault gouge, or a connected network of pre-existing weak faults. Roughly constant small yields roughly constant small frictional strength. The abrupt increase near the base of this layer requires a change of conditions: for example, the weak fluid-rich fault network terminates or becomes discontinuous, leaving stronger intact or less altered rock below. A change in mineralogy or deformation localization can also give a contrast. Simply saying “there are fluids” does not explain the return to high strength. Below the strong region, thermal material creep again lowers the strength.
The figure alone does not identify the weakening mechanism or a particular lithological boundary. In particular, a 10 km strength maximum is not evidence for a 10 km deep Mohorovičić discontinuity. The strong-fault/weak-fault evidence and the distinction between fault strength and surrounding crustal strength are discussed in Stress orientations at intermediate angles to the San Andreas Fault, California by Jeanne L. Hardebeck and Andrew J. Michael.
