The conditioning of tie-line phase-fraction inference describes how strongly composition perturbations change an inferred phase fraction. For a binary mixture with distinct endpoints, the lever rule gives . Its absolute sensitivity to , with endpoints fixed, is . This is an absolute amplification coefficient; a relative condition number additionally depends on the chosen input and output scales.
For an interior , the differential in tie-line phase-fraction sensitivity yieldsto first order. If each composition perturbation is bounded by , this becomes . For original stipulated , endpoint separations and give local worst-case bounds and . Tenfold closer endpoints make the same composition precision tenfold less informative about phase amount. Correlations can change the attainable combinations of errors, as common affine calibration cancellation in the lever rule illustrates.
For fixed multicomponent endpoints and overall-composition covariance matrix , the tie-line phase-fraction uncertainty isThe denominator is endpoint separation after a whitening transformation: separation must be compared with measurement precision, not only plotted distance. This follows from covariance-based uncertainty propagation and the linear fit.[ref]
Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement by JCGM. §§5.1–5.2, sensitivity coefficients and covariance propagation
Near coincident endpoints the inverse problem becomes poorly informative, and at coincidence it is undefined. Near the physical bounds, a large propagated uncertainty also warns that the interior linear approximation may fail. More numerical digits in the fitted answer do not resolve this measurement limitation.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.