The Itô formula decomposes the smooth transform into a continuous local martingale and a finite-variation process:
If has finite variation, then also has finite variation. A continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant, so and
It remains to show that the second-order term vanishes; the preceding observation alone does not establish this.
Let . By the occupation-times formula for the local time of a semimartingale,
Therefore for almost every . Also for almost every : if and , continuity of makes strictly monotone in a neighborhood of , so that zero is isolated. Such isolated zeros form a countable set. Localizing to bounded paths and finite quadratic variation, then using the occupation-times formula once more, gives
Both terms in the Itô formula now vanish. Apply this on all rational times and use continuity to obtain the simultaneous conclusion
This is the finite-variation smooth transform of a continuous local martingale property.
A continuous adapted process is a local martingale if there are stopping times almost surely such that each stopped process is a martingale. In this definition is integrable. A continuous adapted process has finite variation if, almost surely, its paths have finite total variation of a function on each compact time interval:
The permitted fact that this total-variation process is continuous and adapted makes its level-hitting times stopping times.
Suppose , and put . Define
These times increase to infinity almost surely. The optional stopping theorem applied to the localized martingale shows that is a martingale; it is also bounded in absolute value by , with total variation at most . Fix and write . For a deterministic partition of an interval , orthogonality of square-integrable martingale increments gives
Pathwise the sum on the right is bounded by . For partitions with mesh tending to zero, continuity makes this converge to zero. It is bounded by , so dominated convergence gives . First use rational , then continuity, to obtain almost surely. Letting proves
This proves continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant without assuming integrability of the unstopped total variation. Continuity matters: compensated jump martingales can have finite variation without being constant.
Let be the zero-starting continuous local martingale, and let be the total variation of its path on . Stop when or reaches , and also at time . The stopped process is bounded, hence a true square-integrable martingale by the bounded local martingale criterion, and its total variation is bounded by .
For a deterministic partition , martingale increments are orthogonal in , so
The sum inside the expectation is at most the largest absolute increment times the stopped total variation. As the mesh tends to zero, path continuity makes the largest increment tend to zero. The product is bounded by , so the dominated convergence theorem makes the displayed expectation zero. Thus the stopped process vanishes at every fixed time. Use rational times, continuity and to conclude
This proves that a continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant.
Write a normalized semimartingale decomposition as , with both , a continuous local martingale and of finite variation. The difference of two such martingale parts is also the difference of two finite-variation parts, and hence vanishes by the result just proved. The other parts coincide too. The normalized continuous semimartingale decomposition is unique. Fixing the initial constants is necessary: without normalization a constant can be transferred between the two parts.
Let be the total variation of on , and set . Adaptation and continuity of make these stopping times; finite variation on every compact interval gives . The stopped process satisfies and has total variation at most . It is a martingale by the bounded local martingale criterion, and is square-integrable.
Fix and take deterministic partitions with mesh tending to zero. The martingale-difference orthogonality of the increments gives
Pathwise, however,
by uniform continuity on . These sums are bounded by , so the dominated convergence theorem gives . Hence almost surely. Take all rational on a common probability-one event and use continuity to obtain . Then let . This proves the continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant result in its zero-starting form:
The proof does not assume the uniqueness of quadratic variation that is to be established next.
The initial-value convention is essential. A continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant, so the conclusion is up to indistinguishability of stochastic processes. The stated zero conclusion uses the usual zero-start convention ; without it, is a counterexample.
Put . Let be its total-variation process, and stop when either or reaches . The resulting process is a bounded continuous local martingale, hence a true martingale, and its total variation on every time interval is bounded by . Fix and take deterministic partitions whose mesh tends to zero. Orthogonality of martingale increments gives
Pathwise,
by uniform continuity of a continuous path on . The sums are bounded by , so the dominated convergence theorem makes their expectations tend to zero. Hence almost surely. Take the countable intersection over rational and integer , use path continuity, and then let . The stopping times tend to infinity because the original path and its finite variation are bounded on every compact time interval. Thus
The intended setting is with continuous and adapted. These conditions are needed for the requested continuous-semimartingale conclusion; finite variation alone does not supply them. For example, , satisfies the printed deterministic bound and starts at zero, but has a jump for sufficiently large . We use the continuous adapted interpretation throughout this question.
Define . Then , and . The Itô formula gives the canonical continuous semimartingale decomposition
The initial value is zero. The first term is a continuous martingale, since is bounded and the integrand is bounded. The second is continuous adapted finite variation, hence predictable. This decomposition is unique because a continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant. The phrase Doob-Meyer here must mean this semimartingale decomposition: need not be nondecreasing, and the hypotheses do not make a submartingale as required by the Doob-Meyer decomposition theorem. Indeed , so the bounded deterministic drift makes initially decrease, excluding the submartingale property.
The sign process is predictable because it is a Borel function of the continuous adapted, and therefore predictable, process . Its paths need not themselves be left-continuous. Pointwise, including at ,
For a fixed horizon , . The dominated convergence theorem for the finite measure on gives
The Itô isometry, extended from simple predictable integrands by their density, and the Doob L2 maximal inequality now imply
Hence
Use the local convention for the martingale problem, which is appropriate for arbitrary measurable coefficients. A continuous adapted process solves if the coefficient integrals are locally finite and, for every ,
is a local martingale. Here locally finite means almost surely for each . Suitable localization upgrades the identities to true martingale identities. With bounded coefficients and bounded test derivatives, this distinction disappears on finite horizons.
A Markov diffusion generated by is a time-homogeneous Markov process with continuous paths whose infinitesimal generator on the stated test domain is . Its transition operators satisfy the generator limit, and Dynkin formula gives precisely the preceding martingale problem identities. Some terminology uses L-diffusion for the test-function identities alone; the Markov property is an additional assertion unless uniqueness supplies it.
Suppose now . Use smooth compactly supported functions agreeing with and on , and stop before exiting this interval. Removing these stops shows that
is a continuous local martingale. Consequently is a continuous semimartingale. The martingale problem applied to the second cutoff function says that
is a local martingale. The Itô formula for also says that
is a local martingale. Subtracting, the continuous finite-variation process is a local martingale and starts at zero. The theorem that a continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant gives
Define
The integrand is predictable and is stochastically integrable, since its integral against the bracket is exactly . Thus is a continuous local martingale with and . The Lévy characterization of Brownian motion states that these conditions make a Brownian motion relative to the given filtration. Associativity of stochastic integrals recovers , and therefore
The original process is a weak solution of a stochastic differential equation, with its driving Brownian motion constructed on the original space.
Conversely, the Itô formula applied to any weak solution with locally integrable coefficients gives the martingale problem identities. A Markov diffusion with generator gives them by Dynkin formula. A well-posed martingale problem, with the usual measurable path-space setup, identifies a unique family of diffusion laws and yields the Strong Markov property. Without uniqueness, the test-function identities alone do not assert that every chosen solution is Markov. This specifies both the equivalence with weak equations and the role of uniqueness in identifying a diffusion.
For a continuous path of finite variation on , every partition satisfies
Uniform continuity makes the right side tend to zero as the mesh tends to zero. The quadratic variation of the given continuous local martingale is therefore identically zero.
Stop when its magnitude first reaches an integer , so the stopped process is a bounded, square-integrable martingale. The square identity, or the Itô isometry, gives . Hence it is zero at each rational time almost surely, and continuity extends this simultaneously to all times. Let tend to infinity. This proves
This is the continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant principle with initial value zero.
Use two standard results: for every continuous local martingale , there is a unique continuous adapted increasing quadratic variation , starting at zero, such that is a local martingale; and a continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant.
Define the quadratic covariation by the polarization identity
This is continuous, adapted, starts at zero, and is of finite variation on compact time intervals. Since , subtraction of the two quadratic-variation identities shows that is a continuous local martingale. In the zero-start convention this is exactly .
If is another continuous adapted finite-variation process with and the same local martingale property, then is both a continuous local martingale and of finite variation. It is constant, and its initial value is zero, so it vanishes. Uniqueness is up to indistinguishability of stochastic processes.
The normalization is essential. If arbitrary nonzero initial constants are allowed in the martingale class and this normalization is omitted, adding a constant to the bracket preserves the claimed property. The usual definition of quadratic covariation always includes the zero initial value.
Use polarization identity of the quadratic variations:
This is continuous and adapted, starts at zero, and has finite variation on every compact interval because it is a difference of two nondecreasing processes. The defining quadratic variation property gives that and are continuous local martingales; their difference divided by four is . This proves existence without assuming a product formula involving an as yet undefined quadratic covariation.
If and both satisfy the requirements, is a continuous finite-variation process and a local martingale. By continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant, it is constant; its initial value is zero, so up to indistinguishability of stochastic processes.
There is a minor initial-value convention in this characterization. The displayed uncentred local martingale identity is directly valid when , or when the initial terms have the requisite integrability. With arbitrary finite initial values, centre the quadratic variation construction and use , which starts at zero. Adding back requires it to be integrable under the usual definition of a local martingale; the quadratic covariation itself is unaffected by centring.
The Itô formula applied to gives exact cancellation of the drift:
On every finite interval , the Itô integral is square-integrable since . Therefore is a true martingale, and hence a local martingale.
For the other stochastic process, . If were a local martingale, its difference with would make the continuous finite-variation process a local martingale, contradicting the fact that a continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant. Also is not constant. Thus is neither a local martingale nor a martingale.
Define the deterministic function . The independent increments from part (i) show that is increasing and that is a martingale. Mean-square continuity follows from path continuity and the Gaussian laws, so is continuous.
The Itô formula also says that is a local martingale. Their difference is therefore a continuous finite-variation process that is also a local martingale. By the theorem that a continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant, and because the difference starts at zero,
for all almost surely.