Bounded-degree bipartite Ramsey bound Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-07
If a bipartite graph has vertices and maximum degree , thenA dependent random choice argument finds, in one colour, enough vertices whose every subset of at most vertices has a large common neighbourhood; a greedy embedding then places .
Dense bipartite common-neighbour lemma 2026-10-07
In a bipartite graph with parts of sizes and density , a neighbourhood of size at least can be chosen so that at least a proportion of its ordered pairs have at least common neighbours. Choose a random vertex on the other side, use the second moment of its degree, and penalize pairs with few common neighbours. This is a simple dependent random choice tool for controlling restricted sumsets.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 11 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
For a finite nonempty set , its additive energy iswhere counts ordered representations. Since , Cauchy-Schwarz givesThus implies : a small doubling constant forces many additive quadruples.
A polynomial form of the Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem gives the converse after passing to a subset. There are absolute constants such that if , , then some satisfiesThe exponent and constants here need not be optimal.
Precisely, a graph form of the Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem states the following. If are finite sets of size in an abelian group, has at least edges, and its restricted sumsethas size at most , then there are , with andThese are uniform absolute constants, valid for and .
To apply this theorem to additive energy, let and retain the sums with . The discarded sums contribute at most to the additive energy. Since , the retained pairs number at least . There are at most retained sums. They therefore define a bipartite graph of density at least with restricted sumset size at most . The graph theorem supplies large subsets with polynomially bounded .
For completeness, turn this cross-sumset bound into a doubling constant bound. The Ruzsa triangle inequality gives . If , the Plünnecke inequality, applied to the pair , gives . The minimal-growth proof below in Question 5 applies to arbitrary finite pairs and proves this particular expansion estimate as well. All losses are fixed powers of , proving the displayed converse after increasing .
The requested dense bipartite common-neighbour lemma is a dependent random choice assertion. Call an ordered pair in bad when it has fewer than common neighbours. Choose uniformly, and put . ThenFor each bad pair, the probability that both endpoints lie in is its number of common neighbours divided by , which is less than . Thus the expected number of bad ordered pairs in is at most . ConsequentlyChoose a neighbourhood attaining at least this expectation. It has , andHence at least the proportion of its ordered pairs have at least two-edge connections. As usual these connections are counted by common neighbours, including a return walk for a diagonal ordered pair; assume , as the formula requires.
The relevance to the graph theorem is that many two-edge connections turn a sparse collection of permitted sums into additive control on a large vertex subset. On a connection , expresses a difference using two elements of the restricted sumset. The abundance of connections, followed by standard cleaning and further path counting, bounds the number of differences without throwing away most vertices. This is the role of dependent random choice in obtaining polynomial losses in the graph form of the Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 79 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
We will prove a polynomial progression in a high-energy fourfold difference set. The route is to extract a large subset with a small difference set, construct a dense Freiman s-isomorphism model, and use the Bogolyubov lemma and the pigeonhole principle. To respect the proof requirement, every ingredient beyond the elementary rules for Freiman homomorphisms is established below.
Assume . Since three entries of an additive quadruple determine the fourth, , so a nonvacuous hypothesis has . Let . Then and . Define the popular sum set . The contribution to additive energy from its complement is at most . Since , the bipartite graph on two copies of whose edges have sums in has at least edges. Moreover .
Put and . Here is a dependent random choice argument producing the small difference set. Independently choose two right vertices, allowing repetition, and let be their common left neighbourhood. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives . Call an ordered pair of left vertices bad if its common right neighbourhood has fewer than elements. The expected number of bad ordered pairs in is at most , because a fixed bad pair survives both random choices with probability at most . ThusChoose a realization attaining at least this expectation. Then , and . Remove from every vertex having more than bad partners in . At most vertices are removed. The remaining set has , and any have at least vertices for which both and are good.
For such a , there are at least right vertices adjacent to , and at least right vertices adjacent to . These paths givea representation with four members of . For fixed , the tuple of four sums determines uniquely, so there are at least distinct tuples. Select one ordered pair for each member of . Tuples belonging to different differences are disjoint. Counting all possible tuples in provesIn particular, with , we have and for . This is the required small-difference set form of the Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem, proved by counting paths rather than cited.
We next control higher iterated sumsets. Choose a nonempty minimizing , so . We prove the Petridis minimal-growth lemma in the form for finite . Order , and let consist of those for which is new in the union of the translates . Then . Every member of already occurs in an earlier translate of . By minimality, , also when the complement is empty. Thus the new contribution from is at most . Sum over to prove the lemma. Iterating with gives .
For completeness, the Ruzsa triangle inequality in the needed form isFor each , fix . The map is injective: adding the coordinates recovers , and then . Take , , and apply the preceding bounds. We obtain the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequalityIn particular has at most elements.
We now prove a slightly wasteful version of the Ruzsa modeling lemma, avoiding any assumption about the diameter of . Set . Choose a prime larger than all , , and much larger than . Arbitrarily large primes exist by the elementary argument that a prime divisor of one plus the product of all primes up to a given bound exceeds that bound. For a uniformly chosen nonzero multiplier modulo , each nonzero has uniform among the nonzero residues. Call a multiplier forbidden if some such agrees modulo with , where . There are at most such residues. For , a union bound therefore makes the probability of being forbidden less thanChoose a nonforbidden . Represent by integers in and partition that interval into sixteen consecutive pieces of diameter less than . One piece contains the images of a subset with . Let be the integer representative of in that piece, reduced modulo .
A difference of eight sums of these representatives has absolute value less than . If its original difference in is zero, it is a multiple of , hence zero. Conversely, if its reduction modulo is zero, it equals with ; our choice of forces its original difference to be zero. This proves that is a Freiman s-isomorphism of order eight. Injectivity follows by padding a one-term equality to eight terms with a fixed element. Consequently has subset densityNo primality of is needed.
Here is the cyclic Bogolyubov lemma with all its Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group details. Use , , and normalized convolution on a finite group. A finite geometric series proves orthogonality, and expanding the finite sums proves the Parseval identity on a finite group, Fourier inversion on a finite group, and . For , the nonnegative functionhas support exactly and Fourier coefficients on a finite abelian group . Put . The Parseval identity on a finite group gives . The total fourth moment of the frequencies outside is at most .
If for every , then . The zero frequency contributes with no loss. Separating the large and small frequencies in Fourier inversion on a finite group yieldsThus contains the Bohr set expressed in distance coordinates by . This is consistent with the existing character-distance convention for a Bohr set: here it is enough that each character lies in the corresponding short arc around one.
We finally prove the needed nonwrapping progression in a cyclic Bohr set, including for composite . Write and . Partition the -dimensional unit cube into boxes. The points with coordinates modulo one, , give by the pigeonhole principle an integer with for all . ThenThese points are distinct modulo , since their integer representatives lie between zero and . Their number is at least . For the same argument simply chooses .
The Freiman s-isomorphism induces a bijection : define it on a representation by taking the same two positive and two negative images. Equality of representations uses an order-four relation, and injectivity uses the converse relation. If three consecutive members of satisfy , their preimages satisfy the same equality, since its expansion is an equality of eight-term sums in . Hence the inverse image of is an ordinary arithmetic progression in , with distinct terms.
To remove the multiplicative constant from the length bound, let and . The length just proved is at least , where . Choose so that for , and set . For , two distinct members of give a nonzero , and has length three, at least . For , the singleton suffices. In every nonempty case,with depending only on . If empty sets are permitted, the required length is zero and there is no substantive assertion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 122 2 a Solution 2026-09-28
Choose vertices independently and uniformly from , allowing repetitions, and letBy Jensen inequality applied to the convex function ,
Let count the -subsets having fewer than common neighbours in . For each such , the probability that issoThe assumed inequality gives , so some choice has . Delete one vertex from each bad -subset of . The remaining set has size at least and contains no bad -subset, so it is -rich. This is the basic dependent random choice argument.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 122 4 b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Let and red-blue colour . Split its vertices into two classes of comparable size. At least half the cross-edges have one colour, say red. The bounded-degree bipartite Ramsey bound, proved by dependent random choice, gives a set in one class such that every subset of at most vertices of has at least common red neighbours in the other class.
Let be a bipartition. Embed injectively into . List the vertices of and embed them one at a time. Each vertex of has at most already embedded neighbours, whose common red neighbourhood has at least vertices; fewer than host vertices have yet been used, so a fresh choice is available. This greedily constructs a red copy of . Thus
If , a subset satisfies and . A dependent random choice argument in the popular sum graph finds many four-edge paths representing each member of the difference set. The Petridis minimal-growth lemma then bounds all higher iterated sumsets and difference sets.