The doubling constant of a nonempty finite set in an abelian group isIt measures the cardinality of the sumset relative to the original set. For the integer examples, and . A nonconstant arithmetic progression with members has doubling constant , which stays below two as grows. This is the sense in which its sumset has small growth.
In any abelian group, : fixing puts a translated copy inside . The stronger integer bound gives only in that setting. A finite subgroup has , as does every coset , since its sumset is . In particular has doubling constant one.
Small doubling constant is useful because it constrains repeated growth, as in the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality. It signals structure such as arithmetic progressions and subgroups; precise descriptions depend on the ambient abelian group and are the subject of the Freiman-Ruzsa theorem. The additive energy bound below gives a simpler immediate consequence: .
For a finite nonempty subset of an abelian group with doubling constant at most , the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality gives . Applying the Ruzsa covering lemma to using gives for and . Thus , and counting multiplicities in the finite set proves the displayed polynomial bound. For fixed , it is eventually at most for every .
If finite sets satisfy , then the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality bounds iterated sumsets and difference sets by
If a nonempty finite set minimizes among the nonempty subsets of , with minimum , thenfor every finite set . Iteration is a short proof of the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality.
For finite subsets of an abelian group with nonempty,An injective encoding chooses one representation of each element of and translates it by every element of .
For nonempty finite subsets of an arbitrary group,Choose one representation for each . The map is injective.
If a finite subset of a group satisfies , then repeated use of the Noncommutative Ruzsa triangle inequality gives
Let be a finite subgroup and choose with . For , the set has size at most , while contains the double coset of size . Thus bounded doubling alone gives no tripling bound in arbitrary groups.
For every , a finite set in an abelian group with is contained in a coset progression of rank and relative size bounded in terms of alone.
A finite nonempty set of integers with bounded doubling lies in a generalized arithmetic progression with rank and relative size bounded only by the doubling constant. A proof models a large subset in a dense cyclic set, finds a Bohr set in its fourfold difference set by Fourier analysis, and uses the progression in a Bohr set from successive minima. The progression lifts through a sufficiently high-order Freiman isomorphism. A greedy covering of the original set by translates of its doubled progression then gives the claimed containing progression. Geometry-of-numbers properification may make the final progression proper.
Let be a nonempty subset of with doubling constant at most . Translate to containing zero. The Petridis minimal-growth lemma and Ruzsa triangle inequality bound . In injective linear modelling of a small sumset, the image has density at least . The Finite-field Bogolyubov lemma finds a subspace of codimension at most in its fourfold sumset.
After lifting a subspace through a Freiman model, obtain with . The set uses at most cosets. Their representatives generate a quotient group of size at most two to this number. Since , adjoining those representatives and proves the displayed bound. Its constants are deliberately coarse, but depend only on . The nonempty assumption is necessary: no vector subspace has cardinality at most a constant times the size of the empty set.
For a finite subset containing zero, choose and a uniformly random linear map . Each fixed nonzero vector has zero image with probability . The union bound gives a map whose kernel meets only at zero. It is injective on , and . The Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality makes the image of have density at least if .
Under injective linear modelling of a small sumset, every has a unique lift , because differences of two lifts lie in . For , the discrepancy lies in , so it is zero. Thus is a linear map and its image is a vector subspace of the same size as . This verifies the additive lifting step rather than assuming that a preimage chosen from a sumset is automatically a subspace.
For fixed density , rank , and progression length, every sufficiently large proper coset progression of rank at most has the property that each subset of relative density at least contains a nontrivial arithmetic progression of that length. This follows from the multidimensional Szemerédi theorem.
For every there is such that a set with and contains a nontrivial three-term arithmetic progression. The Freiman-Ruzsa theorem places densely in a bounded-rank coset progression, where the Szemerédi theorem in a bounded-rank coset progression applies.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.