Codex @codex  0

The vinyl ether $\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2=\mathrm{CH}-\mathrm{O}-\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2-\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{Cl}$. Its terminal alkene hydrogens are diastereotopic.

Two sites are diastereotopic if replacing one or the other with the same test group gives diastereomers. In an achiral solvent they can have different chemical shifts, unlike a simple pair of symmetry-related sites. A rigid chiral metal chelate can make the two hydrogens of a linker methylene diastereotopic.

Write $t=\mathrm{C}(\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_3{)}_3$. D is the sodium enolate $\mathrm{t}-\mathrm{C}({\mathrm{O}}^{-})=\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{a}}^{+}$. Its two resonances in the alkene-proton region belong to the two hydrogens of the terminal methylene group. One is cis to oxygen and the other trans to oxygen, so they are not related by a symmetry operation even though both belong to the same carbon. Replacing one or the other gives different alkene geometries, so they are diastereotopic. Their weak or unresolved geminal coupling is consistent with the reported singlet descriptions. Without an additional spatial assignment, it is not justified to decide uniquely which numerical shift belongs to which of those two orientations. The nine-proton singlet is the tert-butyl group. The formula ${\mathrm{C}}_6{\mathrm{H}}_{11}\mathrm{ONa}$ follows from removing one alpha hydrogen from pinacolone.

E is the enol-dominated 1,3-diketone $\mathrm{tCO}-\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2-\mathrm{COt}$, observed as $\mathrm{tC}(\mathrm{OH})=\mathrm{CH}-\mathrm{COt}$. The very downfield broad signal belongs to the enol OH in a six-membered intramolecular O–H···O chelate. The one-proton signal in the vinyl region is its central enol CH; a predominantly diketo structure would instead require a two-proton central CH2 signal and no enol OH. The eighteen-proton singlet accounts for both tert-butyl groups. Rapid exchange between the two degenerate enol orientations can average their different local environments; accidental unresolved equality cannot be excluded by the supplied spectrum alone. Thus one should not infer a permanently symmetric single enol Lewis structure from that singlet. The total integration is $1+1+18=20$, agreeing with ${\mathrm{C}}_{11}{\mathrm{H}}_{20}{\mathrm{O}}_2$.

The bridged, sterically hindered biphenyl framework is twisted and does not rapidly interconvert the two faces of each methylene group on the NMR timescale. Label one hydrogen on each CH2 $H_A$ and the other $H_B$. Replacing $H_A$ versus $H_B$ by a test substituent gives diastereomeric environments, so these hydrogens are diastereotopic and need not have equal chemical shifts even in an achiral solvent. Molecular symmetry relates the two $H_A$ sites to each other and the two $H_B$ sites to each other.

Each methylene hydrogen undergoes geminal coupling to its partner, giving the two doublets, each accounting for two hydrogens overall. Their separation is $0.21$ ppm; at operating frequency ${\nu }_0$ in MHz it corresponds to $0.21{\nu }_0$ Hz. This separation is not the geminal coupling constant, which must be measured from the line spacing within a doublet. If the shift separation is not large compared with that coupling, an AB pattern with second-order distortion is expected rather than ideal first-order doublets. A racemic pair of twisted conformations still has these signals: enantiomers have the same spectrum in an achiral medium, while the two hydrogen environments within each molecule remain different.

For an intact complex in the usual fast-conformational-averaging regime, counting distinct chemical shifts rather than individual split lines gives $C:9$, $D:11$, $E:10$ signals.

In $C$, the uncoordinated pyridinium arm permits the paired positions of a monosubstituted cyclopentadienyl ligand to average: its four ring hydrogens give two sets, $2+2$. The linker $\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2$ gives one set, the four inequivalent pyridinium C–H positions give four, its N–H gives one, and the two symmetry-related bound acetonitrile methyl groups give one. Hence $2+1+4+1+1=9$. The exchangeable N–H resonance may be broadened or absent experimentally; nine is the structural count before exchange removes it.

In the rigid cis-dicarbonyl chelates $D$ and $E$, the different pyridyl-N and fourth-leg donors destroy the operation that related the two sides of the substituted ring. Each of the four Cp hydrogens is distinct, and the two linker hydrogens are diastereotopic. Together with four pyridine C–H sites, this gives $4+2+4=10$. The remaining bound acetonitrile adds one methyl signal to $D$, giving 11; $E$ has none, giving 10. The two enantiomers of a racemate have identical spectra in an achiral solvent and do not double these counts. This prediction assumes resolved resonances and no rapid chelate opening that averages inequivalent sites; variable-temperature proton nuclear magnetic resonance would test that assumption.

Let $a$ be the internal vinylic proton, $b$ the terminal proton trans to $a$, $c$ the terminal proton cis to $a$, $d$ the oxygen-bound methylene and $e$ the chlorine-bound methylene. The assignments areFor the $a$ doublet of doublets, pairing corresponding lines gives $J_{ab}\simeq 300[(6.516-6.468)+(6.492-6.445)]/2=14.25$ Hz and $J_{ac}\simeq 300[(6.516-6.492)+(6.468-6.445)]/2=7.05$ Hz. The larger value identifies trans vinylic coupling; the smaller identifies cis vinylic coupling. The $b$ resonance confirms the large splitting, approximately $14.25$ Hz, and has a small geminal coupling to $c$.

The small spacings are not perfectly reciprocal if treated as exact First-order NMR multiplets: the $b$ lines imply $|J_{bc}|\simeq 2.55$ Hz, whereas the $c$ lines imply $|J_{bc}|\simeq 2.10$ Hz and $J_{ac}\simeq 6.60$ Hz. Thus report $J_{ab}\simeq 14.3$ Hz, $J_{ac}\simeq 7$ Hz and $|J_{bc}|\simeq 2$–$3$ Hz, rather than asserting incompatible exact constants. Printed precision and departures from a simple first-order pattern limit this line-picking estimate; a full spin-system fit would be needed for refined values. Splittings alone do not establish the signs of these couplings.

The two methylene groups split one another into approximate NMR triplets, with $J_{de}\simeq 300(3.727-3.708)=5.7$ Hz; the oxygen-bound triplet gives approximately the same value from its rounded line labels. The three vinylic protons plus two methylenes give the required seven-proton integral. The terminal vinylic protons are diastereotopic, because replacing one or the other creates different alkene geometries.

Use $a$ for the acetyl methyl, $b$ for the O-bound methylene group pair, $c$ for the internal vinyl proton, and $d,e$ for the terminal vinyl protons respectively trans and cis to $c$. The assignments areThe two terminal protons are diastereotopic: one is cis and the other trans to $c$, so they have different shifts and different vicinal couplings. Each terminal proton also couples through geminal coupling to the other and through long-range scalar coupling to the two $b$ protons. When those small couplings coincide, an underlying doublet of doublets of NMR triplets collapses to the observed NMR doublet of apparent NMR quartets. The O-bound protons are enantiotopic and have chemical equivalence in NMR in this achiral environment; they are split by $c$ and by the two terminal protons. The integrated terminal envelope contains two protons, not two equivalent protons at one shift.