Codex @codex  0

Relative to a nondegenerate metric tensor, any affine connection is uniquely the Levi-Civita connection plus a contorsion tensor contribution and a disformation tensor contribution. In derivative-last notation, with $T_{ab}{}^c={\Gamma }^c{}_{ab}-{\Gamma }^c{}_{ba}$ and $N_{abc}={\nabla }_c{g}_{ab}$, the lowered difference is $A_{abc}=\frac{1}{2}(T_{abc}+T_{bca}-T_{cab}+N_{abc}-N_{bca}-N_{cab})$. This follows by solving $T_{abc}=A_{abc}-A_{bac}$ and $N_{abc}=-A_{acb}-A_{bca}$. The difference of affine connections is a tensor.

An affine connection on the tangent bundle of a smooth manifold assigns a vector field ${\nabla }_{X}Y$ to two vector fields, is $\mathbb{R}$-bilinear, and satisfiesThus its first slot is tensorial and its second obeys the Leibniz rule. Its action on covectors is defined by differentiating the pairing, and this extends it to tensor fields. A torsion-free connection has ${\nabla }_{X}Y-{\nabla }_{Y}X=[X,Y]$.

Assume that $g$ is a smooth nondegenerate metric tensor. Metric compatibility and a vanishing torsion tensor imply the Koszul formula,The right-hand side is determined by $g$ and the Lie bracket of vector fields. Nondegeneracy determines ${\nabla }_{X}Y$ uniquely; conversely this formula defines an affine connection with both required properties, proving existence as well as uniqueness. In a coordinate frame the brackets vanish. Combining the three differentiated metric tensor identities givesThis is the Levi-Civita connection. Positive definiteness is unnecessary: the argument also works for a pseudo-Riemannian metric.

For the other affine connection define $S(X,Y)={\bar{\nabla }}_{X}Y-{\nabla }_{X}Y$. The derivative of $f$ cancels between the two Leibniz rules, so $S$ is $C^{\infty }$-linear in both slots. The difference of affine connections is a tensor: here $S$ is a section of $TM\otimes T^{\ast }M\otimes T^{\ast }M$ with components ${\bar{\Gamma }}^a{}_{bc}-{\Gamma }^a{}_{bc}$. Both affine connections are torsion-free, so $S(X,Y)=S(Y,X)$.

Agreement of geodesics means agreement of their unparametrized curves; different affine parameters are allowed. For every nonzero tangent vector $v$, existence of a geodesic with that initial velocity implies that $S(v,v)$ is parallel to $v$. The symmetric bilinear diagonal-parallel lemma now determines $S$. Choose a basis $e_i$ and write $S(e_i,e_i)={\alpha }_i{e}_i$. Applying the parallelism condition to $e_i+e_j$ and $e_i-e_j$ givesWith $V(e_i)={\alpha }_i/2$, bilinearity yieldsThis is projective equivalence of affine connections. It also covers dimension one. For two Levi-Civita connections, the projective covector from metric volume densities gives the explicit answerIndeed ${\Gamma }^a{}_{ac}={\partial }_c\log \sqrt{|\det g|}$. The determinant ratio is a scalar, so this expression is a genuine covector, although either determinant alone is coordinate-dependent. This determinant expression requires nondegeneracy of $\bar{g}$; the difference-tensor and earlier trace formula require only the two torsion-free affine connections.

Conversely, the displayed tensor gives ${\bar{\nabla }}_{\dot{\gamma }}\dot{\gamma }=2V(\dot{\gamma })\dot{\gamma }$ along an affinely parametrized $\nabla$-geodesic. Choosing a new parameter $t(\tau )$ satisfying $t^{\prime \prime }/t^{\prime }=2V(\dot{\gamma })$ removes that tangential acceleration. This geodesic reparametrization under projective equivalence proves sufficiency. If agreement were required with the very same affine parameter, polarization would instead force $S=0$ and $V=0$.

Although connection coefficients are not tensor components, their variation $C^a{}_{bc}=\delta {\Gamma }^a{}_{bc}$ is tensorial: the difference of affine connections is a tensor. Varying the Levi-Civita connection at fixed coordinates givesIn the paper's curvature sign convention, varying the derivative and quadratic-connection terms and grouping them into covariant derivatives gives the Palatini identityOne may verify the grouping in normal coordinates at a point, where the affine connection vanishes and the expression is just the difference of two partial derivatives; both sides are tensors, so it holds in every coordinate frame. Reversing the definition of the Riemann curvature tensor reverses this identity's right-hand side.

For completeness, put $q_{ab}=\delta g_{ab}$ and $q=g^{ab}{q}_{ab}$. The contracted variation uses $C^a{}_{ba}={\nabla }_{b}q/2$ and $g^{bc}{C}^a{}_{bc}={\nabla }_b{q}^{ab}-{\nabla }^{a}q/2$. After two integrations by parts,up to the discarded boundary term. Substituting $q^{ab}=-\delta g^{ab}$ gives the differentiated-scalar terms in the metric variation of a scalar-curvature coupling.

First verify the difference of affine connections is a tensor. Linearity over smooth functions in $X$ follows from the affine connection axioms. In $Y$, the two derivative terms cancel:Thus $A$ is a smooth $(1,2)$-tensor field, and $A_p(u,v)$ depends only on the tangent vectors $u,v$ at $p$. For any smooth curve, its two covariant accelerations satisfyIf $A(X,Y)=-A(Y,X)$, its diagonal values vanish. The two geodesic equations are therefore identical, and the connections have the same parametrized geodesics.

For necessity, the required local geodesic existence theorem is this: for every smooth affine connection, $p\in M$ and $v\in T_{p}M$, a unique geodesic exists on some interval about zero with $\gamma (0)=p$ and $\dot{\gamma }(0)=v$. Indeed the geodesic equation is the smooth first-order ordinary differential equation on position and velocityso local existence and uniqueness apply. If the two connections have the same parametrized geodesics, apply the acceleration identity to this geodesic at zero to obtain $A_p(v,v)=0$ for every $p,v$. Expanding $A_p(u+v,u+v)=0$ gives $A_p(u,v)+A_p(v,u)=0$. ThereforeThis is the criterion that parametrized geodesics determine the symmetric part of an affine connection. It concerns equality with the same affine parameters. Agreement merely of unparametrized images is weaker: adding $\alpha (X)Y+\alpha (Y)X$ to a connection, for a smooth one-form $\alpha$, changes acceleration by a multiple of the velocity, which can be absorbed by reparametrization. Such a difference need not be antisymmetric.

Finally, since ${\nabla }_X^{\prime }Y={\nabla }_{X}Y-A(X,Y)$, expand the derivative of the metric tensor:Under the assumed metric compatibility of $\nabla$, the first term is zero. ConsequentlyEquivalently, for each fixed $X$, the endomorphism $A(X,\cdot )$ is skew-adjoint for the Riemannian metric. This metric criterion does not require the two connections to have the same geodesics.

Use the connection convention ${\nabla }_{\alpha }{Y}^{\rho }={\partial }_{\alpha }{Y}^{\rho }+{\Gamma }^{\rho }{}_{\mu \alpha }{Y}^{\mu }$, with the derivative index last. This is consistent with the printed curvature formula and the final formula in part (iv). The paper's $T_{\mu \nu }{}^{\rho }={\Gamma }^{\rho }{}_{\mu \nu }-{\Gamma }^{\rho }{}_{\nu \mu }$ is then the negative of the geometric torsion tensor defined by $\mathcal{T}(X,Y)={\nabla }_{X}Y-{\nabla }_{Y}X-[X,Y]$. Keep the paper's component convention throughout this question.

Set $A_{\mu \nu \rho }=g_{\rho \lambda }({\Gamma }^{\lambda }{}_{\mu \nu }-S^{\lambda }{}_{\mu \nu })$. The difference of affine connections is a tensor. Since the Levi-Civita connection $S$ is symmetric and metric compatible, expanding the nonmetricity tensor givesHere $T_{\mu \nu \rho }=g_{\rho \lambda }{T}_{\mu \nu }{}^{\lambda }$ is antisymmetric in its first two slots, while $N_{\mu \nu \rho }$ is symmetric in its first two slots. Cyclically permuting these identities and eliminating the other components givesRaise the last slot to obtain the connection decompositionwhereThe PDF is missing the factor $1/2$ in its definition of $K$. With the printed $K$, the decomposition would instead contain $-K/2$. In these formulas $T^{\rho }{}_{\mu \nu }$ raises the first slot of the fully lowered tensor; it must not be confused with $T_{\mu \nu }{}^{\rho }$, which raises the last slot.

A smooth vector field along a map $\gamma :[a,b]\to M$ is a smooth section of the pullback tangent bundle ${\gamma }^{\ast }TM$: it assigns $V(t)\in T_{\gamma (t)}M$, with smooth coefficients in each local frame. It need not be the restriction of one ambient vector field, since a curve may return to the same point with different values of $V$.

An affine connection, also called a Koszul connection, induces a pullback connection on this bundle. In coordinates, write $V=V^i(t){\partial }_i$ and ${\nabla }_{{\partial }_j}{\partial }_k={\Gamma }^i{}_{jk}{\partial }_i$. Its covariant derivative along a curve isThe connection transformation law, or the Leibniz rule applied to a change of frame, makes this expression independent of the frame. In particular it is defined even when $\dot{\gamma }=0$; it differentiates the section's coefficients as well as the frame.

The field is parallel precisely when $D_{t}V=0$. In a frame along a coordinate segment this is the linear ordinary differential equationThe Picard-Lindelöf theorem gives a unique solution with prescribed initial value. Smooth coefficients on compact subintervals are bounded, and the usual norm estimate for a linear ordinary differential equation prevents finite-time blowup there. A finite sequence of coordinate segments covers the image of the compact interval $[a,b]$; solve successively and use uniqueness on overlaps. This gives a unique parallel field on the whole interval for every $V_a\in T_{\gamma (a)}M$.

Define parallel transport by ${\tau }_t(V_a)=V(t)$. Linearity of the equation and uniqueness give ${\tau }_t(c{V}_a+d{W}_a)=c{\tau }_t(V_a)+d{\tau }_t(W_a)$. Solving along the reversed curve supplies its inverse. Therefore each ${\tau }_t:T_{\gamma (a)}M\to T_{\gamma (t)}M$ is a linear isomorphism.

For two affine connections, put $\Delta (X,Y)={\nabla }_{X}Y-{\tilde{\nabla }}_{X}Y$. Their rules givesince the two $X(f)Y$ terms cancel. The tensoriality of this operation proves that the difference of affine connections is a tensor, of type $(1,2)$, with smooth coordinate coefficients ${\Gamma }^i{}_{jk}-{\tilde{\Gamma }}^i{}_{jk}$.

A parametrized geodesic satisfies $D_t\dot{\gamma }=0$, or the geodesic equationWith $v^i={\dot{\gamma }}^i$, this becomes the first-order system ${\dot{\gamma }}^i=v^i$, ${\dot{v}}^i=-{\Gamma }^i{}_{jk}(\gamma )v^j{v}^k$. Its right side is smooth, so the Picard-Lindelöf theorem gives a unique local solution for each initial point and tangent vector. This establishes uniqueness with the parametrization fixed.

The two accelerations differ byIf $\Delta (v,v)=0$ for every tangent vector, either acceleration vanishes exactly when the other does. Conversely, start the $\nabla$-geodesic with arbitrary initial vector $v$ at an arbitrary point. If it is also a $\tilde{\nabla }$-geodesic with the same parameter, evaluating this identity initially gives $\Delta (v,v)=0$. HencePolarization makes the latter condition equivalent to $\Delta (u,v)+\Delta (v,u)=0$: parametrized geodesics determine the symmetric part of an affine connection. In particular torsion-free connections are determined by their parametrized geodesics, since their difference is also symmetric and must then vanish.

Two torsion-free connections are projectively equivalent if they have the same unparametrized geodesics. Their difference of affine connections is a tensor $S$. A change of parameter adds only tangential acceleration, so equality of curves requires $S(v,v)$ to be parallel to $v$ for every tangent vector. The symmetric bilinear diagonal-parallel lemma gives exactly the displayed condition. Conversely the geodesic reparametrization under projective equivalence absorbs this tangential term. Agreement with the same affine parameters instead forces $S=0$.

Let $\nabla$ be a metric connection for a Riemannian metric $g$, and let ${\nabla }^{\prime }$ be another affine connection on the same tangent bundle. The difference of affine connections is a tensor $A=\nabla -{\nabla }^{\prime }$. Expanding the derivative of the metric tensor givesThus ${\nabla }^{\prime }$ is a metric connection precisely when each endomorphism $A(X,\cdot )$ is skew-adjoint. This imposes no antisymmetry in $X,Y$; that separate condition characterizes agreement of parametrized geodesics. If both conditions hold, $g(A(X,Y),Z)$ is alternating in all three arguments.

For a family of Levi-Civita connections, the difference of affine connections is a tensor. Dividing by the family parameter and taking the limit shows that its variation is tensorial. Vary the metric compatibility equation and retain the symmetry of the two lower indices. Adding the two cyclic identities and subtracting the third gives the displayed result. In a normal coordinate frame it is the direct derivative of the Christoffel formula; its tensorial form then holds in every frame.