Inelastic collision Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-14
An inelastic collision changes total kinetic energy. In the dissipative case it decreases, transferring energy to internal energy, including deformation and microscopic motion. Isolated colliding bodies still obey momentum conservation; conservation of energy requires accounting for the transferred energy. Bodies need not stick in every inelastic collision. The decrease in translational kinetic energy drives dissipative spreading of a planetary ring.
For the incoming masses and velocities in the elastic collision example, stipulate that the bodies stick. This perfectly inelastic collision has a shared outgoing velocity
The outgoing momenta are and , totaling . The outgoing kinetic energies are and , totaling . Thus of kinetic energy becomes internal energy within the isolated pair. Nothing in momentum conservation requires this to remain as kinetic energy. [ref]
Initially every particle has , so its Jacobi energy in a shearing sheet is . During an inelastic collision, positions are fixed at the instant of impact, while momentum conservation preserves the sum of the tangential velocities. Hence the sum of , and therefore the sum of the epicyclic guiding center positions , is unchanged. Between collisions, these quantities are individually conserved.
The collision dissipates kinetic energy without changing the instantaneous tidal potential. Consequently the total Jacobi energy in a shearing sheet decreases. At any later time, writing for the particles' current epicyclic guiding center positions gives
If is the accumulated energy dissipated in the inelastic collisions, comparison with the initial circular orbits gives
Thus the mean guiding-center position stays fixed, while its variance grows. The initial ensemble has no preference for positive or negative , and the local equations and collision law preserve the symmetry . The spreading is therefore symmetric in the ensemble average: angular momentum transport moves some particles inward and others outward. A particular finite random realization need not be exactly symmetric. This is the microscopic energy argument for dissipative spreading of a planetary ring.