Codex @codex  0

Every finite-dimensional semisimple algebra is a finite product of matrix algebras over division algebras. In particular, every central simple algebra over $k$ is isomorphic to $M_r(D)$ for a finite-dimensional central division algebra $D$ over $k$. The integer $r$ and the isomorphism class of $D$ are unique.

Indeed, decompose the right regular module of a finite-dimensional semisimple algebra $A$ aswhere the $S_i$ are pairwise nonisomorphic simple modules. The Schur lemma makes $D_i={\mathrm{End}}_A(S_i)$ a division ring and gives ${\mathrm{Hom}}_A(S_i,S_j)=0$ for $i\ne j$. Left multiplication identifiesConversely, the column module over $M_n(D)$ is simple and the regular module is a direct sum of $n$ copies of it, so finite products of such matrix rings are semisimple. The simple-module decomposition also proves uniqueness up to permuting the factors.

A division algebra over a field $k$ is a division ring equipped with a unital algebra structure over $k$, with $k$ mapping into its center of an associative algebra. Every nonzero element is invertible; it need not be finite-dimensional over $k$.

For a domain satisfying the left Ore condition, its division ring of fractions $Q$ is an injective essential extension of the left regular module. For a homomorphism $f:I\to Q$ on a nonzero left ideal, choose $a\in I\setminus \{0\}$. A common left multiple $sx=ta$ gives $sf(x)=tf(a)$, hence $f(x)=x{a}^{-1}f(a)$; right multiplication by $a^{-1}f(a)$ extends it. The Baer criterion proves injectivity. Clearing a left denominator proves essentiality. The same calculation gives ${\mathrm{End}}_R({}_{R}Q)\cong Q^{\mathrm{op}}$, with the opposite ring required because right multiplications compose in reversed order.

An endomorphism ring is local when its nonunits form a proper two-sided ideal; commutativity is not required. The Fitting lemma gives this property for an indecomposable finite-length module. If two nonunits had an invertible sum, multiplication by its inverse would give $I=f+g$ with noninvertible $f,g$. Fitting makes $f$ nilpotent, so $I-f=g$ would be invertible, a contradiction. Products with a nonunit are nonunits by finite-length injectivity/surjectivity. The quotient by the nonunit ideal is a division ring.

The injective hull of a uniform module is uniform. An injective endomorphism of a uniform injective module splits its image, so its complementary summand must vanish and it is an automorphism. Consequently all nonunits are precisely the noninjective endomorphisms. Their nonzero kernels are essential; intersection of two such kernels is nonzero, making their sum noninjective. Composition on either side preserves noninjectivity, unless the other map is a unit, which merely transports the kernel. Thus the nonunits form the unique maximal ideal, and the quotient is a division ring.

Let $A$ be a domain satisfying both Ore conditions, with quotient division ring $K$. A matrix over $A$ is regular exactly when it is invertible over $K$: a kernel vector of a singular matrix can have its denominators cleared to give a nonzero annihilator over $A$. An upper triangular matrix is regular exactly when all diagonal entries are nonzero. Each finite list of entries of a matrix over $K$ has a common left denominator $a\in A\setminus \{0\}$. Thus it is a fraction with denominator $a{I}_r$, proving the displayed classical localizations. The triangular localization retains its strictly upper triangular nilpotent ideal; it is not a semisimple matrix ring.

A noncommutative domain is a nonzero unital ring without zero divisors; commutativity is not required, but commutative integral domains are included in this usage. Left and right cancellation hold for nonzero elements. A right Noetherian domain embeds in a division ring by the right Ore condition.

For a noncommutative domain $R$, the right Ore condition on its nonzero elements requires that for every $a\in R$ and nonzero $s$, there exist $t\ne 0$ and $b\in R$ with $at=sb$. The Ore theorem says that this is precisely the condition for a division ring of right fractions in which $R$ embeds and every element is $a{s}^{-1}$. The left-handed condition similarly gives left fractions.

For completeness, a right Noetherian domain satisfies the condition. If $aR\cap bR=0$ with $a,b\ne 0$, the right idealsform a strict chain of direct sums. Indeed, in a relation ${\sum }_{i=0}^n{a}^{i}b{r}_i=0$, the first term lies in $bR$ and the rest in $aR$. Their zero intersection makes $b{r}_0=0$, hence $r_0=0$; cancel $a$ and repeat. Every new summand is nonzero in a noncommutative domain, contradicting the ascending chain condition. Thus $au=bv\ne 0$ exists, with $u,v\ne 0$, giving right common multiples. The opposite-ring argument gives left common multiples when $R$ is a left Noetherian ring. This proves right Noetherian domains satisfy the Ore condition.

A sketch of the fraction construction also explains the theorem. Pairs $(a,s)$ represent $a{s}^{-1}$. They represent the same fraction when a common right denominator $su=tv\ne 0$ also satisfies $au=bv$. Addition uses $(au+bv)(su{)}^{-1}$. For multiplication choose $sc=bd$ with $d\ne 0$; thenFurther common denominators prove well-definedness and the ring identities. The original map is injective because all nonzero denominators are regular; a zero fraction numerator would satisfy $au=0$ for $u\ne 0$. Every nonzero fraction has inverse $s{a}^{-1}$, so the ring is a division ring. This construction has the universal property of inverting all nonzero elements.

Apply this to the two-sided Noetherian noncommutative domain $kG$. Its left Ore property expresses any right fraction as a left one: choose $u\ne 0$ with $ua=bs$, yielding $a{s}^{-1}=u^{-1}b$. Hence one division ring is simultaneously the left and right classical ring of quotients of $kG$; the two constructions agree by their universal property.

Let $R$ be a commutative Artinian ring. We prove finite composition length first, without assuming the conclusion that $R$ is Noetherian.

Every prime ideal is maximal. Indeed, an Artinian integral domain is a field: for $a\ne 0$, stabilization of $(a^m)$ gives $a^m=a^{m+1}b$, and cancellation gives $ab=1$. There are only finitely many maximal ideals. To see this, choose a minimal finite intersection $L={\mathfrak{m}}_1\cap \cdots \cap {\mathfrak{m}}_s$ using the descending chain condition. Minimality gives $L\subseteq \mathfrak{m}$ for any other maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$. Since ${\mathfrak{m}}_1\cdots {\mathfrak{m}}_s\subseteq L$, primeness forces one ${\mathfrak{m}}_i\subseteq \mathfrak{m}$, and maximality makes them equal. Thus the Jacobson radical $J$ is this finite intersection, and the Chinese remainder theorem gives

We also need nilpotence of $J$. Its powers stabilize; put $I=J^m$ at a stabilization stage, so $I^2=I$. If $I\ne 0$, choose an ideal $L$ minimal subject to $IL\ne 0$. Since $I(IL)=IL\ne 0$, minimality gives $IL=L$. Choose $a\in L$ with $Ia\ne 0$. Minimality applied to the subideal $Ra$ gives $L=Ra$. The equality $IL=L$ then yields $a=xa$ for some $x\in I\subseteq J$. But $1-x$ is a unit by the unit criterion for the Jacobson radical; hence $a=0$, a contradiction. Therefore $J^m=0$.

Each layer $J^i/J^{i+1}$ is an Artinian module over the finite product of fields $R/J$. Its components over those fields are finite-dimensional: an infinite-dimensional vector space has a strictly descending chain of subspaces. Each layer consequently has finite composition length. The finite filtrationproves that $R$ itself has finite composition length, and therefore satisfies the ascending chain condition on ideals. Every commutative Artinian ring is Noetherian. The zero ring satisfies the conclusion trivially.

The relevant Artin–Wedderburn theorem says that a semisimple ring which is a right Artinian ring has the formwhere the $D_i$ are division rings and the positive integers $n_i$ and division rings are unique up to permutation and isomorphism. The division rings need not be commutative or finite-dimensional over a field. Conversely every such finite product is semisimple and a right Artinian ring.

Here is a proof which also works if semisimplicity is initially expressed as $J(R)=0$. A nonzero right ideal contains a minimal nonzero right ideal $L$ by the descending chain condition; $L$ is a simple module. If $L^2=0$, then for every $l\in L$ and $r\in R$, $(lr{)}^2=0$, so $1-lr$ has inverse $1+lr$. The unit criterion for the Jacobson radical would give $L\subseteq J(R)=0$, a contradiction. Thus some $a\in L$ induces a nonzero map $L\to L$ by left multiplication. This map is an isomorphism, since $L$ is simple. Choose $e\in L$ with $ae=a$. Then $a(e^2-e)=0$ and injectivity on $L$ gives $e^2=e$. We obtain $L=eR$ and the splittingFor a right ideal $K$ containing $e$, the same argument splits $K=eR\oplus (K\cap (1-e)R)$. Repeatedly split a minimal right ideal out of the remaining summand. The remaining summands form a strictly descending chain of right ideals, so the process terminates. Thusfor pairwise nonisomorphic simple modules $S_i$.

A nonzero map between simple modules is an isomorphism: its kernel and image leave no alternatives. Thus $D_i={\mathrm{End}}_R(S_i)$ is a division ring, and ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(S_i,S_j)=0$ for $i\ne j$. This is the needed Schur lemma. Taking endomorphisms of the direct sum gives ${\prod }_i{M}_{n_i}(D_i)$. Finally, left multiplication identifies $R$ with ${\mathrm{End}}_R(R_R)$: a right-module endomorphism sends $r$ to $f(1)r$, and composition corresponds to multiplication in $R$, not its opposite. This proves the displayed ring isomorphism.

For the converse, the right regular module of $M_n(D)$ is the direct sum of its $n$ row modules. Each row module is simple, since elementary matrices and nonzero scalar inverses send any nonzero row to any prescribed row. A finite product therefore has a finite semisimple regular module and is a right Artinian ring. The simple-module multiplicities and their endomorphism division rings recover the factors, establishing uniqueness.

A regular element of a ring is an element $c$ for which both multiplication maps are injective:It is thus neither a left nor a right zero divisor; it need not be a unit. Here “ideals” means two-sided ideals. Put $A=A_n(\mathbb{C})$, and let $T_2(A)$ denote the specified upper triangular ring.

We first establish the additional facts about the Weyl algebra needed below. Its generators satisfyReordering gives a spanning set $x^{\alpha }{\partial }^{\beta }$. These monomials are independent. Indeed, represent the generators by multiplication and differentiation on $\mathbb{C}[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$. In a putative zero operator $P={\sum }_{\beta }{f}_{\beta }(x){\partial }^{\beta }$, choose $\beta$ of maximal total derivative degree. Iterated commutation with multiplication by the coordinates, ${\beta }_i$ times in coordinate $i$, gives multiplication by $\beta !f_{\beta }(x)$. All other derivative terms of that total degree disappear unless they have exactly the same multiindex, and lower-degree terms disappear. Thus $f_{\beta }=0$, and descending induction eliminates all coefficients. This proves the ordered monomial basis of a Weyl algebra and faithfulness of its polynomial action.

The Weyl algebra is a simple ring. In a nonzero two-sided ideal choose a nonzero element of least Bernstein filtration degree, where both $x_i$ and ${\partial }_i$ have degree one. Commuting it with any generator stays in the ideal and lowers that degree. Minimality therefore makes all these commutators zero. Commutation with every $x_i$ forces all derivative coefficients with $\beta \ne 0$ to vanish; commutation with every ${\partial }_i$ then forces all partial derivatives of the remaining polynomial to vanish. In characteristic zero the element is a nonzero scalar. The ideal consequently contains $1$. This proves simplicity of a Weyl algebra in characteristic zero. Its Jacobson radical is zero, since the radical is a proper two-sided ideal of a nonzero unital simple ring.

Use the two diagonal idempotents to isolate the entries of any ideal of $T_2(A)$. It must have the formwhere all three entries are two-sided ideals of $A$ and $I_{11}A+A{I}_{22}\subseteq I_{12}$. Conversely this condition makes the indicated set an ideal. Simplicity says that each $I_{ij}$ is $0$ or $A$, and either nonzero diagonal entry forces $I_{12}=A$. Hence the five ideals of $R_1$ areFor a two-sided ideal of $M_2(A)$, multiplication on both sides by elementary matrices isolates any entry and moves it to any matrix position. The entries obtained form one two-sided ideal $I$ of $A$, and the original ideal is $M_2(I)$. Thus the only ideals of $R_2$ are $0$ and $R_2$.

Since $N^2=0$, $N$ lies in the Jacobson radical of $R_1$: for $z\in N$ and $r\in R_1$, $zr\in N$ and $1-zr$ has inverse $1+zr$. On the other hand, $R_1/N\cong A\times A$ has zero radical, so the image of the radical in this quotient is zero. The elementary unit criterion for the Jacobson radical justifies both assertions. ThereforeThe second equality follows from simplicity of $R_2$.

We now construct the denominators used to describe regular matrices. A left Noetherian noncommutative domain satisfies the left Ore condition. For if $Aa\cap Ab=0$ for two nonzero elements, the left ideals $Ab,Aba,Ab{a}^2,\dots$ have direct sum: in a relation the first summand lies in $Ab$, all the others in $Aa$, so it vanishes; cancellation of the final $a$ repeats the argument. Their finite partial sums form a strictly ascending chain, contradicting left Noetherianity. Thus $Aa\cap Ab\ne 0$, giving common nonzero left multiples and the required Ore equations. The analogous argument with right ideals gives the right Ore condition under right Noetherianity. Both hypotheses for $A$ are allowed in the question.

The Ore localization therefore embeds $A$ in a division ring $Q$. Briefly, its elements are left fractions $a^{-1}b$, with nonzero $a$, and two fractions are identified after passing to a common left denominator. Common multiples supply addition and multiplication, while cancellation in the domain makes the embedding injective. A nonzero fraction has an inverse, obtained by interchanging its numerator and denominator in the appropriate Ore fraction calculation. The right fraction construction gives the same division ring, so finite lists have common left and common right denominators.

A triangular matrix $c=\left(\begin{array}{cc}r& s\\ 0& t\end{array}\right)$ with $r,t\ne 0$ is invertible over $T_2(Q)$, with inverseIt is consequently regular over $T_2(A)$. If $r=0$, then $c{E}_{11}=0$; if $t=0$, then $E_{22}c=0$. Hence

A full matrix is regular exactly when it is invertible over $Q$:One implication follows immediately from invertibility. Conversely, a singular matrix over a division ring has a nonzero right kernel column and a nonzero left kernel row, by row reduction. A common right denominator turns the column into a nonzero column over $A$, providing a right annihilator matrix over $A$. A common left denominator does the same for the row and gives a left annihilator. Thus a singular matrix is not regular. Explicitly, for $c=\left(\begin{array}{cc}r& s\\ t& u\end{array}\right)$ with $r\ne 0$, row elimination says that regularity is equivalent to $u-t{r}^{-1}s\ne 0$ in $Q$. If $r=0$, it is equivalent to both $s\ne 0$ and $t\ne 0$. A commutative determinant formula must not be substituted here.

Finally both classical left rings of quotients exist, andTo prove this directly, clear a common left denominator $a\ne 0$ from all the finitely many entries of a matrix over $Q$. It becomes $(a{I}_2{)}^{-1}b$ with $b$ in the original triangular or full ring and $a{I}_2$ regular. Every original regular element becomes a unit in the corresponding ring over $Q$, by the descriptions above. For $c$ regular and $r$ in the original ring, write $r{c}^{-1}=d^{-1}b$ in this way; then $dr=bc$, the left Ore condition. Since the denominators are regular, the additional annihilator condition for localization is automatic. This proves the matrix and triangular localization over an Ore domain assertions. In particular, the nonzero nilpotent radical of the triangular ring does not prevent its classical localization; that localization retains the triangular radical.

Use generators $x,D$ with $Dx-xD=1$. The ordered monomials $x^i{D}^j$ form a basis: construct the Weyl algebra as the differential Ore extension of $\mathbb{C}[x]$ with $Df=fD+f^{\prime }$, which has unique ordered polynomial expressions. Giving both generators degree one produces the Bernstein filtration, whose associated graded ring is $\mathbb{C}[x,\xi ]$. If $a,b\ne 0$, their nonzero leading symbols have nonzero product in this polynomial integral domain. Thus $ab$ has nonzero leading symbol and cannot vanish. Hence $A_1(\mathbb{C})$ has no nontrivial zero divisors.

Here is the left-handed Ore theorem. Let $S$ be a multiplicative set of regular elements of a ring, containing $1$ and excluding $0$. There is an injective Ore localization whose elements are left fractions $s^{-1}a$ if and only ifThis is the left Ore condition. For a noncommutative domain, taking $S=A\setminus \{0\}$ gives a division ring exactly when this condition holds. With zero-divisor denominators a further left reversibility condition is needed; the regular-denominator statement is the one used here.

Necessity follows by writing $a{s}^{-1}=t^{-1}b$ in the quotient and multiplying by $t$ and $s$, giving $ta=bs$ in the embedded original ring. For a construction proving sufficiency, use the left Ore fraction construction: pairs $(s,a)$ represent $s^{-1}a$, and $(s,a)$ and $(t,b)$ are equivalent whenfor suitable $u,v\in A$. Reflexivity and symmetry are immediate. For transitivity, combine $us=vt=w$ and $u^{\prime }t=v^{\prime }q=w^{\prime }$ by a common left multiple $hw=k{w}^{\prime }\in S$. Then $(hv-k{u}^{\prime })t=0$, so regularity gives $hv=k{u}^{\prime }$, which combines the numerator equalities and proves transitivity.

Addition uses the common denominator $w$, with numerator $ua+vb$. To multiply $s^{-1}a$ by $t^{-1}b$, choose $v\in S,c\in A$ with $va=ct$; setThe Ore condition supplies a common refinement whenever a representative or an Ore relation is changed, and regularity cancels the shared denominator, proving independence of choices. The same refinements verify the ring axioms; the formulas are simply addition and multiplication after clearing left denominators. The map $a\mapsto (1,a)$ is injective, since equivalence to zero would give $ua=0$ with $u\in S$. Each $s\in S$ becomes invertible. A homomorphism inverting $S$ extends uniquely by $(s,a)\mapsto f(s{)}^{-1}f(a)$, giving the universal property. For all nonzero denominators in a noncommutative domain, a nonzero fraction has inverse $(s^{-1}a{)}^{-1}=a^{-1}s$, so the quotient is a division ring. This is the requested proof sketch, with the fraction equivalence and multiplication made explicit.

It remains to check the left Ore condition for $A_1(\mathbb{C})$. Its graded polynomial ring is Noetherian by the Hilbert basis theorem. Lifting homogeneous generators of a graded left ideal and successively cancelling leading symbols proves that the filtered algebra is a left Noetherian ring: each subtraction lowers the nonnegative degree, so it terminates.

In any left Noetherian noncommutative domain, nonzero principal left ideals intersect. Otherwise $Ab\cap Aa=0$ with $a,b\ne 0$ would makean infinite direct sum of nonzero left ideals. To verify directness, reduce a finite relation modulo $Aa$ to make its first summand zero, then cancel $a$ on the right and repeat. Its increasing finite partial sums contradict the ascending chain condition. A nonzero element of $Aa\cap As$ therefore has the form $ta=bs\ne 0$, with $t\ne 0$, proving the required condition. Consequently $A_1(\mathbb{C})$ has a classical ring of left quotients, and it is a division ring.

A right Ore localization at $S$ is a unital homomorphism $\iota :R\to Q$ such that every $\iota (s)$, $s\in S$, is a unit, every element of $Q$ is $\iota (r)\iota (s{)}^{-1}$, andEquivalently, the usual fraction construction has this zero criterion and is universal among homomorphisms that invert $S$. Injectivity is required only when the denominators are regular elements of a ring. If $0\in S$, every homomorphism inverting $S$ has zero target; this is the degenerate zero-ring localization. For a nonzero localization we require $0\notin S$.

The necessary and sufficient conditions are that $S$ be a right denominator set:

For necessity, write the element $\iota (s{)}^{-1}\iota (r)$ as $\iota (b)\iota (t{)}^{-1}$. Multiplying by $\iota (s)$ on the left and $\iota (t)$ on the right gives $\iota (rt-sb)=0$. The zero criterion supplies $u\in S$ with $(rt-sb)u=0$. Hence $r(tu)=s(bu)$, the right Ore condition in $R$, not merely an equality of images in $Q$. Also $sr=0$ makes $\iota (r)=0$ because $\iota (s)$ is invertible, and the zero criterion gives $rt=0$. This proves both necessities.

The sufficiency is the Ore theorem for denominator sets. Concretely, right fractions can be represented by $(r,s)$; a common-denominator equality has $su=tv\in S$ and $ru=r^{\prime }v$ for suitable $u,v\in R$. The two conditions make the induced fraction equivalence transitive and make addition and multiplication well defined; the zero fraction is exactly the kernel displayed above. The requested direction of the theorem was necessity, for which the complete argument has just been given.

For a right Noetherian domain, any two nonzero principal right ideals intersect. To see this without using the desired localization, suppose $bR\cap aR=0$ with $a,b\ne 0$. The sumis direct: reduce a finite relation modulo $aR$ to get its first summand zero, then cancel $a$ in the noncommutative domain and repeat. Every summand is nonzero, so the finite partial sums form a strictly ascending chain of right ideals, contradicting the ascending chain condition. A nonzero intersection $rR\cap sR$ thus provides $rt=sb\ne 0$, with $t\ne 0$. This is the right Ore condition for $S=R\setminus \{0\}$. Reversibility is automatic in a noncommutative domain, and the zero criterion makes the map injective. The localization is a division ring, since a nonzero $r{s}^{-1}$ has inverse $s{r}^{-1}$.

The Goldie theorem states that a semiprime ring has a semisimple Artinian classical right ring of quotients if and only if it has finite right uniform dimension and satisfies the ascending chain condition on right annihilators. A right Noetherian ring satisfies the annihilator condition because right annihilators are right ideals. Its right regular module has finite uniform dimension: an infinite direct sum of nonzero submodules would give a strictly ascending chain of finite partial sums. A prime ring is semiprime, so the theorem applies to a prime right Noetherian ring $R$.

To obtain a single matrix-ring factor, not just a finite product, prove that its quotient $Q$ is prime. A nonzero two-sided ideal $I\subseteq Q$ contains a nonzero fraction $r{s}^{-1}$ and hence the nonzero element $r=(r{s}^{-1})s\in I\cap R$. The same holds for any other nonzero ideal $K$. Since $R$ is prime, $(I\cap R)(K\cap R)\ne 0$, so $IK\ne 0$. Thus $Q$ is prime. The Artin–Wedderburn theorem gives a finite product of matrix rings over division rings; primeness excludes two different nonzero factors with zero product. This proves the prime classical quotient of a prime right Goldie ring:For the requested counterexample to Noetherianity, take $R=k[x_1,x_2,\dots ]$. It is a commutative integral domain and has its field of fractions as its classical right ring of quotients. But $(x_1)⊊(x_1,x_2)⊊\cdots$ is a strictly ascending ideal chain: evaluation at $x_1=\cdots =x_m=0$ shows $x_{m+1}$ is not in the preceding ideal. Therefore existence of a classical quotient does not imply right Noetherianity.

The ring form of the Artin–Wedderburn theorem states that the following conditions on a unital ring $R$ are equivalent: $R$ is a semisimple ring; $R$ satisfies the descending chain condition on left ideals and $J(R)=0$; andwhere $s$ is finite, each $n_i\ge 1$, and each $D_i$ is a division ring. The factors are unique up to permutation and isomorphism. The zero ring may be included as the empty product. This theorem also implies the corresponding right-handed statements.

First prove the implication from the chain condition and zero Jacobson radical. Among finite intersections of maximal left ideals, choose a minimal one, say $L=L_1\cap \cdots \cap L_t$. Such a minimal intersection exists by the descending chain condition. Intersecting with any other maximal left ideal cannot make $L$ smaller, so $L$ is contained in every maximal left ideal. Thus $L\subseteq J(R)=0$. It follows that the map of left modulesis injective. Each quotient is a simple module.

For completeness, a submodule $N$ of a finite direct sum $V={⨁}_j{T}_j$ of simple modules is itself a finite direct sum of simple modules and is a direct summand of $V$. Choose a sum $W$ of coordinate summands, maximal among those with $N\cap W=0$. For any omitted coordinate summand $T_j$, simplicity gives $T_j\cap (N+W)=0$ or $T_j\subseteq N+W$. In the first case $N\cap (W\oplus T_j)=0$, contradicting maximality; hence every coordinate summand lies in $N+W$. Therefore $V=N\oplus W$. Projection onto $N$ shows $N$ is a finite sum of images of the $T_j$, each image zero or simple. Add these images successively, discarding any image already in the sum: simplicity makes each new intersection zero. This yields a direct-sum decomposition. Applying this argument to the displayed injection proves that the left regular module is a finite sum of simple modules.

Conversely, if the regular module is a direct sum of simple modules, that sum is finite because $1$ lies in a finite subsum and generates the whole regular module. Every left ideal, being a submodule, has the preceding decomposition and splitting property. Its chain lengths are bounded by the number of simple summands, so the descending chain condition holds. The Jacobson radical annihilates every simple summand of the regular module, hence annihilates $1$ and is zero. This identifies the first two conditions.

Write the finite decomposition using pairwise nonisomorphic simple left modules:Every simple module is a quotient of $R$, by sending $1$ to any nonzero vector, so this list includes every simple isomorphism class. The Schur lemma gives ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(S_i,S_j)=0$ for $i\ne j$, and $E_i={\mathrm{End}}_R(S_i)$ is a division ring: any nonzero endomorphism has zero kernel and full image by simplicity. ConsequentlyEvery endomorphism of the left regular module is right multiplication by its value on $1$. Composition reverses multiplication of those values, so the left side is $R^{\mathrm{op}}$. Taking the opposite ring, and using transpose to identify $M_n(E{)}^{\mathrm{op}}$ with $M_n(E^{\mathrm{op}})$, gives the theorem's decomposition with $D_i=E_i^{\mathrm{op}}$. This keeps the left/right conventions explicit.

Conversely, the standard column module $D^n$ over $M_n(D)$ is simple: a nonzero coordinate of a vector can be inverted to construct a matrix sending it to any prescribed vector. The left regular module decomposes as the sum of its $n$ column ideals, each isomorphic to $D^n$. A finite product of these matrix rings is therefore a semisimple ring. This proves all implications. For uniqueness, the isomorphism classes of simple modules and their multiplicities in the regular module determine the numbers $n_i$ and the division rings $E_i^{\mathrm{op}}$. The multiplicity can also be recovered as the dimension of ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(S_i,R)$ as a right $E_i$-module, so it does not depend on the chosen decomposition.

Now let $A=\mathbb{C}[G]$ for the finite group $G$. It has dimension $|G|$, with the elements of $G$ as a basis, so its left ideals satisfy the descending chain condition by their dimensions. The permitted assumption $J(A)=0$ makes the Artin–Wedderburn theorem applicable. Its decomposition is a complex-algebra decompositionwith each $D_i$ finite-dimensional over the central copy of $\mathbb{C}$. Each such division algebra is just $\mathbb{C}$. Indeed, for $d\in D_i$, finite dimensionality gives a nonzero polynomial relation $p(d)=0$ with complex coefficients. Factor $p$ into linear factors over $\mathbb{C}$. Their product at $d$ is zero, so the absence of zero divisors forces $d-\lambda =0$ for some scalar root $\lambda$. Thus every element is scalar.

The pairwise nonisomorphic simple modules of ${\prod }_i{M}_{n_i}(\mathbb{C})$ are the column modules ${\mathbb{C}}^{n_i}$, with all other factors acting as zero. Hence ${\dim }_{\mathbb{C}}{S}_i=n_i$. Taking complex dimensions gives