Effective bandwidth describes the exponential-moment traffic rate at a specified time scale and tail parameter. Independent sources have additive effective bandwidths. The Chernoff bound connects their sum to overflow bounds. For a single time unit, the small-parameter limit is the expected value and the large-parameter limit is the essential supremum, with appropriate moment or extended-value conventions.
For independent Poisson arrival counts of mean per slot, with one unit of work per arrival, the cumulant-generating function is . Its effective bandwidth is the displayed expression. If , the equation has a unique positive root: strict convexity, negative initial derivative after subtracting , and divergence to infinity prove existence and uniqueness. Independent Poisson streams combine by replacing with the sum of their intensities.
Independent slots carry either zero work or units, the latter with probability . Their effective bandwidth is the displayed expression, with small-parameter limit and large-parameter limit when . For , the positive root of determines the optimized exponential overflow bound. In the special case , the stationary queue workload is geometric with ratio , and the root is , giving exactly for integers .
Let a slotted queue have stationary input, constant service , and finite stationary queue workload . Write for its past cumulative arrivals. The union bound and Chernoff bound give the displayed inequality for . It requires no temporal independence. If each is finite and , the series is finite: its tail is bounded by a geometric series. Consequently for . The condition is that the asymptotic effective bandwidth be less than service capacity.
For a nondecreasing process with stationary increments and independent increments, suppose . If , then is a nonnegative supermartingale. Applying the maximal inequality for a nonnegative supermartingale up to time and then letting gives
The stationary workload of a stable queue fed by has this supremum distribution, using the past input and stationary increments and independent increments. For independent flows, the constraint is , where is the long-time effective bandwidth. The result bounds a continuous-time supremum directly; a one-time Chernoff bound by itself does not do that.
For in the finite moment-generating function domain and integrable , Jensen inequality gives the lower bound and almost surely gives the upper bound. The Holder inequality makes convex with . Thus for , and the effective bandwidth is nondecreasing. It need not be strictly increasing: deterministic traffic gives a constant bandwidth. Infinite peaks or exponential moments require extended-value conventions.
For independent identically distributed traffic increments and constant service , let . If , apply the Chernoff bound at each candidate workload window and sum a geometric series. This bounds the stationary random-walk supremum. It explains the effective bandwidth criterion and distinguishes a queue's infinite-horizon overflow event from a single-window traffic event.
For nonnegative traffic with exponential moments near zero, its effective bandwidth has expansion . For bounded traffic with essential supremum , it increases toward : the exponential moment is at most , and any positive probability of gives . Unbounded traffic has an infinite large-parameter limit when all positive exponential moments exist; a finite moment domain must be respected.
For a normal distribution , the logarithm of its moment-generating function is . Dividing by gives its effective bandwidth. Independent demands add these bandwidths. For total mean and positive total variance , optimizing a Chernoff bound with target , , yields the sufficient margin .
For a normal distribution with mean , positive variance , and , the target is equivalent to the displayed constraint, where is the standard normal distribution function. This follows from and strict monotonicity of . Unlike the sufficient Chernoff bound margin , this constraint is necessary as well as sufficient. The exact quantile can be negative when .
If a random variable has variance zero and mean , it equals almost surely. For a target probability strictly between zero and one, meets the target exactly when . Substituting zero variance into a positive-variance non-strict quantile constraint incorrectly includes , where the overflow probability is one. The distinction comes from the atom at the threshold.

Ancestors (7)

  1. Stochastic network
  2. Queueing theory
  3. Probability theory
  4. Probability and statistics
  5. Area of mathematics
  6. Mathematics
  7. Home

Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.