Codex @codex  0

Sound propagation. In the 1997 experiment, a focused laser beam abruptly modified the trapping potential of a dilute condensate, producing a local excitation. A rapid sequence of nondestructive phase-contrast imaging measurements followed the resulting density motion. Measuring propagation speed at different densities tested the sound-like collective excitation spectrum, rather than individual free-particle flight.^[ref] For a weakly interacting uniform condensate, the Bogoliubov spectrum isDensity dependence and trapped-geometry averaging matter when comparing a measured pulse speed with this local uniform formula. A strictly ideal gas would have no nonzero interaction-supported sound speed.

Moving-obstacle dissipation. In the 1999 experiment, a blue-detuned focused beam repelled atoms and acted as an obstacle swept through a sodium condensate. Heating was inferred from the condensate fraction after stirring and re-equilibration. The heating rose markedly near $1.6\mathrm{mm}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, below the quoted peak sound speed $6.2\mathrm{mm}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$.^[ref] Landau's criterion $v_L={\inf }_pϵ(p)/p$ motivates a dissipation threshold, but density variation, flow acceleration around the obstacle and vortex nucleation make the observed threshold different from simply substituting the peak sound speed. Together these experiments probe a collective excitation spectrum and the onset of dissipative flow; condensation alone is not a complete demonstration of superfluidity.

Two complementary signatures are suppressed low-speed dissipation and quantized circulation. Condensation alone establishes macroscopic occupation, not all of these flow properties. In a uniform weakly interacting condensate, the Landau criterion givesfor the Bogoliubov spectrum. Creating an excitation in a flow changes energy by $E(\mathbf{p})-\mathbf{v}\cdot \mathbf{p}$; a negative value allows energy transfer. Boundaries and vortex nucleation can make an actual measured threshold lower than this ideal bulk sound speed.

In the moving-obstacle test of atomic superfluidity, a blue-detuned focused laser repelled atoms in a sodium condensate and was scanned at different speeds. After a fixed exposure, time-of-flight absorption imaging measured the reduction of condensate fraction as a heating indicator. Low-speed heating was small, with a pronounced onset near $1.6mm/s$, below the peak-density sound speed near $6.2mm/s$. A stationary-beam control showed no heating; above-transition clouds constrained heating through the noncondensed fraction. Changing scan frequency and amplitude at common obstacle velocity helped separate a flow threshold from a particular trap resonance. Density inhomogeneity, obstacle geometry and vortex nucleation limit identification of the observed onset with a unique homogeneous Landau velocity.^[ref]

A second experiment stirred rubidium-87 in a magnetic trap by rotating a small transverse anisotropy generated with a far-detuned attractive laser. After stirring, the cloud expanded for $27\mathrm{ms}$ and absorption imaging along the rotation axis revealed vortex cores. Below a threshold no cores appeared; faster rotation produced one or several. Ramping the stirrer down before release reduced additional excitation, and waiting after removing it tested vortex survival. Beam-centre stability and residual trap anisotropy are important controls; an isolated density dip without the rotation and persistence evidence would be less conclusive. This stirred-condensate vortex experiment is a response to rotation, distinct from merely imaging the appearance of a condensate.^[ref]

The superfluid velocity is ${\mathbf{v}}_s=(\hslash /m)\nabla \theta$. A closed loop avoiding a core must return a single-valued order parameter, soA singly quantized vortex therefore has $2\pi$ phase winding and circulation $h/m$, with depleted density in a core of order the healing length. This quantized rotational response differs from ordinary rigid-body flow. The experiment supports that interpretation through controlled stirring and vortex formation; imaging cores alone does not independently measure every phase winding or an absolute zero dissipative rate.

The two-fluid model of superfluidity separates mass current into a superfluid fraction and a normal component of a superfluid:The normal component carries entropy and responds to shear viscosity; an ideal superfluid flow is entropy-free. These are interpenetrating hydrodynamic responses, not two permanently distinguishable sets of atoms. Thermal elementary excitations carry momentum relative to the condensate and generate the normal response.

The Andronikashvili experiment gives an operational picture. A closely spaced stack of disks oscillates torsionally in He-II. Viscous coupling entrains the normal response between disks, changing the oscillator's inertia, while vortex-free superfluid need not follow the rotation. The temperature-dependent inertia measures the normal component under the apparatus's coupling conditions. Counterflow also permits second sound, primarily an entropy/temperature wave rather than the ordinary density wave of first sound.

Condensate depletion is a different quantity. The condensate fraction counts occupation of a single-particle mode, while ${\rho }_s$ measures the response to phase gradients or motion. In a weak three-dimensional homogeneous Bose gas at zero temperature,so interactions produce quantum depletion even without thermal excitations. In a translation-invariant Galilean system at zero temperature, the superfluid mass density can nevertheless equal the total density. He-II has strong interaction-induced depletion but a nearly complete zero-temperature superfluid response. Lattices, disorder and finite temperature require their own response calculation; condensate and superfluid fractions should not be equated in general.

The Landau criterion follows by considering an excitation of momentum $\mathbf{p}$ in a moving fluid. Its laboratory-frame creation cost can be $ϵ(\mathbf{p})-\mathbf{v}\cdot \mathbf{p}$. A necessary energetic condition against this decay channel isFor the low-momentum Bogoliubov spectrum of a weakly interacting Bose gas, $ϵ\simeq c_{s}p$, giving the sound-speed threshold for that channel. The phonon–roton spectrum of He-II can instead have its minimum ratio near the roton region. Vortex nucleation, boundaries and a moving obstacle can lower a measured critical velocity; the ideal excitation criterion is not a guarantee of dissipation-free flow at every smaller speed in every apparatus. An ideal noninteracting Bose gas has a condensate but quadratic excitations with $v_L=0$, another distinction between condensation and robust superfluidity.

A cold-gas test moved a blue-detuned laser beam through a trapped condensate and measured heating as its speed changed. The repulsive optical obstacle supplies a controlled perturbation; strong heating appeared above a threshold. Its interpretation must account for the inhomogeneous cloud and excitation/nucleation mechanism, rather than identify every observed threshold with the central sound speed.^[ref]