Codex @codex  0

The observation-timescale-dependent temperature below which a magnetic configuration no longer relaxes readily during a measurement. For exchange bias it can mark stable pinning of antiferromagnetic interfacial domains and can be below the bulk Néel temperature. It is not identical to the thermodynamic onset of magnetic order.

For collinear saturated layers, $M_{\mathrm{tot}}=2M{s}_p+M{s}_f$, where $s_p,s_f=\pm 1$. Thus parallel states have $M_{\mathrm{tot}}=\pm 3M$ and $R=R_P$, whereas antiparallel states have $M_{\mathrm{tot}}=\pm M$ and $R=R_{AP}>R_P$. The free layer switches in the smaller-field interval; the reference layer switches only at larger fields and its loop is shifted by exchange bias.

The plotted switching fields are illustrative rather than supplied measurements. In the normal read-head minor-loop range, the reference stays positive and only the $3M\leftrightarrow M$ pair is sampled. Rotational reversal and domain formation can round these ideal abrupt steps.

A spin valve contains a magnetically soft free ferromagnet, a thin nonmagnetic metallic spacer and a reference ferromagnet pinned by exchange bias from an antiferromagnet. The recording track's stray field rotates or reverses the free-layer moment while the reference remains approximately fixed. Spin-dependent scattering makes the resistance lower for parallel moments and higher for antiparallel moments. A sense current converts this into a voltage signal, or a fixed voltage into a current signal.

A useful angular approximation is $R(\theta )=R_P+(R_{AP}-R_P)(1-\cos \theta )/2$. Biasing the equilibrium moments near $90^{\circ }$ gives an approximately linear response to small track fields. Pinning stability, magnetic shielding and the sensor's spatial extent matter for reading adjacent narrow bits.^[ref]

Write the descending and ascending switching fields as $H_{-}$ and $H_{+}$. The exchange bias loop centre and magnetic coercivity half-width areWith exchange bias, a field-cooled bilayer has $H_E\ne 0$, often a shift opposite to the cooling field for the conventional negative-bias case shown in the diagram. The sign is not universal; it depends on interfacial coupling and preparation. A simple rigid-pinning estimate is $H_E\sim -J_{\mathrm{int}}/({\mu }_0{M}_s{t}_F)$.

Cooling farther below the blocking range usually strengthens antiferromagnetic anisotropy and suppresses thermal relaxation, so the magnitude of the shift and often the coercive width grow. Close to or above the blocking temperature the shift disappears; the blocking temperature can be below $T_N$. Repeated cycling can rearrange interfacial spins and reduce the bias, and the two reversal branches can acquire different shapes. Thus increasing low-temperature asymmetry is a common tendency, not a guaranteed monotonic law for every interface.

Scientific background for the 2007 Physics Nobel Prize. Spin-dependent conduction, exchange bias and magnetic read-head applications. Used for mechanism context, not as an official exam answer.

A directional magnetic preference that distinguishes a Magnetization direction from its reverse, unlike a purely uniaxial easy-axis energy. A pinned interface can supply such a preference and produce exchange bias. In a simple model its interfacial energy term is proportional to $-J_{\mathrm{int}}\cos \theta$.