Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 25 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write for the Chebyshev theta function and for the Second Chebyshev function, where is the Von Mangoldt function. We first establish the Chebyshev estimate. Every prime divides the central binomial coefficient , soApply this at successive powers of two and use monotonicity to obtain . Sincethe terms contribute and therefore . This Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients is all the information about the distribution of primes needed here.
The Von Mangoldt divisor identity gives the factorial proof of Mertens first theorem. With , interchange the finite sums to obtainComparison of with gives . Dividing the preceding identity by , using and the Chebyshev estimate, givesThe contribution of higher prime powers is bounded independently of , becauseThus the Mertens first theorem is
For the square-root logarithmic sum over primes, apply partial summation to with weight . The lower endpoint is understood as , soThe main terms are and . The bounded error in produces a bounded integral, since . ThereforeNeither argument uses the Prime number theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 22 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write for the Chebyshev theta function and for the Second Chebyshev function. Throughout, denotes a prime and all logarithms are natural. Each prime divides the central binomial coefficient, soApply this at and telescope: . Bounding a general by the next power of two proves . Splitting the prime-counting function at now givesThis is the required Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients, with no use of a prime asymptotic.
The higher prime powers also satisfyFor an integer , the prime factorization of a factorial givesThe Stirling formula, or integral comparison for , says . After division by we obtain . MoreoverSubtract this bounded contribution and replace by . The factorial proof of Mertens first theorem therefore yields
For fixed , apply partial summation to and :The main contribution isThe bounded error in contributes at the endpoint and in the integral, since . Thus the positive logarithmic moments of reciprocal primes satisfy