Write for the Chebyshev theta function and for the Second Chebyshev function, where is the Von Mangoldt function. We first establish the Chebyshev estimate. Every prime divides the central binomial coefficient , so
Apply this at successive powers of two and use monotonicity to obtain . Since
the terms contribute and therefore . This Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients is all the information about the distribution of primes needed here.
The Von Mangoldt divisor identity gives the factorial proof of Mertens first theorem. With , interchange the finite sums to obtain
Comparison of with gives . Dividing the preceding identity by , using and the Chebyshev estimate, gives
The contribution of higher prime powers is bounded independently of , because
Thus the Mertens first theorem is
For the square-root logarithmic sum over primes, apply partial summation to with weight . The lower endpoint is understood as , so
The main terms are and . The bounded error in produces a bounded integral, since . Therefore
Neither argument uses the Prime number theorem.
Write for the Chebyshev theta function and for the Second Chebyshev function. Throughout, denotes a prime and all logarithms are natural. Each prime divides the central binomial coefficient, so
Apply this at and telescope: . Bounding a general by the next power of two proves . Splitting the prime-counting function at now gives
This is the required Chebyshev estimate from central binomial coefficients, with no use of a prime asymptotic.
The higher prime powers also satisfy
For an integer , the prime factorization of a factorial gives
The Stirling formula, or integral comparison for , says . After division by we obtain . Moreover
Subtract this bounded contribution and replace by . The factorial proof of Mertens first theorem therefore yields
For fixed , apply partial summation to and :
The main contribution is
The bounded error in contributes at the endpoint and in the integral, since . Thus the positive logarithmic moments of reciprocal primes satisfy