Suppose is an open normal subgroup of a pro-p group and has a finite pro-p presentation. Choose lifts of generators of the finite quotient . Add finitely many relators giving their conjugation and inverse conjugation on the generators of , and replace each quotient relator by its value in . The resulting finite finite pro-p presentation maps onto . Its closed subgroup generated by the kernel generators is isomorphic to , and its quotient by that subgroup is exactly , so the map is also injective.
A topological group module is a topological abelian group with a jointly continuous action of by group automorphisms. Its continuous cochains with topological coefficients are
with pointwise addition. The inhomogeneous differential is
For , this means . Continuity of multiplication and of the action ensures that preserves continuous cochains. Expanding gives cancellation in pairs: the two orders of multiplying neighbouring arguments agree by associativity, and the two ways of applying the action agree by its action law. Thus . The cocycles are and the coboundaries are , with . Define
For general topological coefficients this is an algebraic quotient of the continuous cochains; its optional quotient topology need not be Hausdorff. For discrete coefficients it is the usual continuous cohomology of a profinite group. In degree zero it is the subgroup of invariant elements.
Give the discrete prime field its trivial -action. The one-cocycle condition becomes and every one-coboundary is zero. Hence
Every such group homomorphism kills powers and group commutators, hence their closure , and every continuous functional on the quotient pulls back. If is topologically finitely generated, is a finite elementary abelian group. To verify finiteness without assuming it, the closure of a subgroup generated by elements of this abelian exponent- quotient has at most elements; a finite subgroup is already closed. Thus is a finite-dimensional vector space. Question 2 says that a generating family of is minimal precisely when its images give a basis of . The dual space has the same finite dimension. This proves
There is a genuine missing hypothesis if the printed assertion is read for arbitrary pro-p groups and means the least cardinality of any dense generating family. Here is an explicit infinite-rank failure of the first-cohomology generator formula. Let and . Enumerate the finite binary strings as and define if is a prefix of , and otherwise. For finitely many distinct sequences , choose long enough prefixes to distinguish each individually. The corresponding project onto the coordinate unit vectors of , so surjects onto every finite coordinate projection and is dense in the product topology. No finite family can generate densely, since a finitely generated abelian exponent- subgroup is finite and closed. Thus . On the other hand, continuity of a linear functional to means its kernel contains a basic neighbourhood, so it depends on finitely many coordinates. The coordinate projections are consequently a basis of the continuous dual space, giving
The unrestricted infinite-rank formula is false. A convention requiring a generating basis tending to the identity is different from the printed unrestricted topological generator count; the finite-rank identity proved above has no such ambiguity.
For finite , a free pro-p group is characterized by the universal property that every map to a pro-p group extends uniquely to a continuous group homomorphism . It is the pro-p completion of the abstract free group on : each map to a finite -group factors through one of the defining finite quotients, and passing to the inverse limit gives the extension to any pro-p group; uniqueness follows from density. This unrestricted universal property can also define the completion on an arbitrary set . When using an infinite basis required to tend to the identity, one instead imposes the universal property only for maps tending to the identity. Only the finite-rank version is needed for the following argument.
A finite pro-p presentation is an isomorphism
There are finitely many generators and finitely many relators, and the denominator is their closed normal closure. The relators are elements of the free pro-p group; they may be limits of ordinary words. That distinction is important when writing conjugation relations below.
Now suppose has a finite pro-p presentation with generators and relators . The quotient is a finite p-group. Choose a finite finite pro-p presentation . Such a presentation exists, for example by using its entire finite multiplication table. Lift the quotient generators to . For every , choose elements of the free pro-p group on the that map respectively to and in . Choose mapping to , which lies in . Form the finite finite pro-p presentation
All listed relations hold in , giving a continuous surjective group homomorphism : its compact image contains and maps onto .
Let be the closed subgroup of topologically generated by the . Both conjugation directions were included, so each normalizes . The also normalize it, and its closed normalizer contains the generators of . Thus . The relations give a continuous surjection . Its composite with induced by fixes every , and hence is the identity. Therefore the surjection is injective as well, so . On quotienting by , the conjugation and kernel relations disappear, and the remaining presentation is exactly . Thus is an isomorphism. The kernel of lies in and meets trivially, so is trivial. Consequently , proving